Research Institute on Traffic and Road Safety (INTRAS), University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 19;12:1335209. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1335209. eCollection 2024.
While Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) have become a prominent topic in road safety research, there has been relatively little discussion about their effectiveness in preventing car collisions involving specific vulnerable road users, such as cyclists. Therefore, the primary objective of this systematic literature review is to analyze the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of in-vehicle ADAS in preventing vehicle collisions with cyclists.
To achieve this goal, this systematic review analyzed a selection of original research papers that examined the effectiveness of ADAS systems in preventing car-cyclist collisions. The review followed the PRISMA protocol, which led to the extraction of 21 eligible studies from an initial pool of 289 sources indexed in the primary scientific literature databases. Additionally, word community-based content analyses were used to examine the research topics and their links within the current scientific literature on the matter.
Although the current number of studies available is still scarce (most sources focus on car-motorcyclist or car-pedestrian crashes), the overall quality of the available studies has been reasonably good, as determined by the selected evaluation methods. In terms of studies' outcomes, the literature supports the value of in-vehicle ADAS for preventing car-cyclist crashes. However, threatful side effects such as unrealistic expectations of these systems and users' overconfidence or desensitization are also highlighted, as well as the need to increase driver training and road user awareness.
The results of this study suggest that Advanced Driver Assistance Systems have significant potential to contribute to the prevention of driving crashes involving cyclists. However, the literature emphasizes the importance of concurrently enhancing user-related skills in both ADAS use and road-user interaction through educational and training initiatives. Future research should also address emerging issues, such as ADAS-related behavioral ergonomics, and conduct long-term effectiveness assessments of ADAS in preventing car-cycling crashes and their subsequent injuries.
PROSPERO, unique identifier CRD42024505492, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=505492.
虽然高级驾驶辅助系统（ADAS）已成为道路安全研究中的一个重要课题，但关于其在预防涉及特定弱势道路使用者（如骑自行车的人）的汽车碰撞方面的有效性的讨论相对较少。因此，本系统文献综述的主要目的是分析关于车内 ADAS 预防车辆与骑自行车者碰撞的有效性的现有证据。
为了实现这一目标，本系统综述分析了一组原始研究论文，这些论文研究了 ADAS 系统在预防汽车-自行车碰撞方面的有效性。该综述遵循 PRISMA 协议，该协议从主要科学文献数据库中索引的 289 个来源中提取了 21 项符合条件的研究。此外，还使用基于词汇的内容分析方法来检查当前关于该主题的科学文献中的研究主题及其联系。
尽管目前可用的研究数量仍然很少（大多数来源都集中在汽车-摩托车或汽车-行人碰撞上），但通过所选评估方法，可用研究的总体质量相当好。就研究结果而言，文献支持车内 ADAS 预防汽车-自行车碰撞的价值。然而，也强调了这些系统的不切实际的期望以及用户的过度自信或脱敏等威胁性副作用，以及需要增加驾驶员培训和提高道路使用者的意识。
本研究的结果表明，高级驾驶辅助系统在预防涉及骑自行车者的驾驶碰撞方面具有重要的潜力。然而，文献强调了通过教育和培训举措同时提高 ADAS 使用和道路使用者交互方面的用户相关技能的重要性。未来的研究还应解决新兴问题，例如与 ADAS 相关的行为人体工程学，并对 ADAS 在预防汽车-自行车碰撞及其后续伤害方面的长期有效性进行评估。
PROSPERO，唯一标识符 CRD42024505492，https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=505492。
