Suppr超能文献

人工耳蜗植入途径及术中电生理测量:三级医疗中心的回顾性分析

Cochlear Implant Insertion Routes and Intra-operative Electrophysiological Measurements: A Retrospective Analysis at a Tertiary Care Centre.

作者信息

Tadke Kanchan, Singh Pradyumna

机构信息

Department of ENT, Government Medical College & Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra India.

出版信息

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Feb;76(1):928-933. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-04322-y. Epub 2023 Nov 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cochlear implant surgeries are performed by different surgical routes, Round window (RW), Extended round window (Ext RW) and Cochleostomy (C). Optimum intracochlear electrode placement is important to achieve a successful outcome. Intra-operative electrophysiological testing (Impedance and ECAP) is crucial to assess the device function and appropriate electrode placement. The variability of portal of electrode insertion might affect the neural response and its characteristics.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the intraoperative electrophysiological measurements (Impedance and ECAP) for possible differences on auditory nerve stimulation across the three electrode insertion routes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective data analysis of 47 cochlear implant recipients at a tertiary care centre in Central India over a period of 4 years. They were broadly divided into two groups depending on the electrode design as full banded and half banded. Intraoperative impedances were recorded for different modes of stimulation and ECAP measured at E5, E10, E15, E20 electrodes in both the groups across the three insertion routes.

RESULTS

In the half-banded group, the impedance values in different modes CG, MP1, MP2, MP1 + 2 did not differ significantly among the surgical routes at all four electrodes. While in the full banded group, for CG mode impedance values at E5 differ significantly. Rest for other modes in full banded group, there was no statistically significant difference across the three routes.

CONCLUSION

The present study supports that there is no statistically significant difference in the intraoperative impedance and ECAP measurements in both, the full-banded and half- banded electrodes across the three surgical routes implying that, all the three surgical approaches provide equal stimulation of the auditory nerve. The CI surgeon can select the electrode insertion portal based on the surgical anatomy, the implant type and individual preferences.

摘要

背景

人工耳蜗植入手术通过不同的手术路径进行,即圆窗(RW)、扩展圆窗(Ext RW)和耳蜗造口术(C)。最佳的耳蜗内电极放置对于取得成功的手术效果很重要。术中电生理测试(阻抗和电蜗神经动作电位)对于评估设备功能和合适的电极放置至关重要。电极插入入口的可变性可能会影响神经反应及其特征。

目的

比较三种电极插入路径在听神经刺激方面术中电生理测量值(阻抗和电蜗神经动作电位)的可能差异。

材料与方法

这是一项对印度中部一家三级护理中心47名人工耳蜗植入受者进行的为期4年的回顾性数据分析。根据电极设计,他们大致分为全带电极组和半带电极组。记录两组在三种插入路径下不同刺激模式的术中阻抗,并在E5、E10、E15、E20电极处测量电蜗神经动作电位。

结果

在半带电极组中,所有四个电极在不同刺激模式(CG、MP1、MP2、MP1 + 2)下的阻抗值在各手术路径之间无显著差异。而在全带电极组中,对于CG模式,E5电极处的阻抗值有显著差异。全带电极组中其他模式下,三种路径之间无统计学显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,全带电极组和半带电极组在三种手术路径下的术中阻抗和电蜗神经动作电位测量值均无统计学显著差异,这意味着所有三种手术方法对听神经的刺激是相等的。人工耳蜗植入外科医生可以根据手术解剖结构、植入物类型和个人偏好选择电极插入入口。

相似文献

8
An evidence-based guide for intraoperative cochlear implant backup use.术中使用人工耳蜗备用设备的循证指南。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Sep;79(9):1500-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.06.037. Epub 2015 Jul 4.

本文引用的文献

7
Cochlear implants.人工耳蜗
Curr Biol. 2014 Sep 22;24(18):R878-R884. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.053.
8
Impedance changes in chronically implanted and stimulated cochlear implant electrodes.长期植入并受刺激的人工耳蜗电极的阻抗变化
Cochlear Implants Int. 2014 Jul;15(4):191-9. doi: 10.1179/1754762813Y.0000000050. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验