Tadke Kanchan, Singh Pradyumna
Department of ENT, Government Medical College & Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra India.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Feb;76(1):928-933. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-04322-y. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
Cochlear implant surgeries are performed by different surgical routes, Round window (RW), Extended round window (Ext RW) and Cochleostomy (C). Optimum intracochlear electrode placement is important to achieve a successful outcome. Intra-operative electrophysiological testing (Impedance and ECAP) is crucial to assess the device function and appropriate electrode placement. The variability of portal of electrode insertion might affect the neural response and its characteristics.
To compare the intraoperative electrophysiological measurements (Impedance and ECAP) for possible differences on auditory nerve stimulation across the three electrode insertion routes.
This is a retrospective data analysis of 47 cochlear implant recipients at a tertiary care centre in Central India over a period of 4 years. They were broadly divided into two groups depending on the electrode design as full banded and half banded. Intraoperative impedances were recorded for different modes of stimulation and ECAP measured at E5, E10, E15, E20 electrodes in both the groups across the three insertion routes.
In the half-banded group, the impedance values in different modes CG, MP1, MP2, MP1 + 2 did not differ significantly among the surgical routes at all four electrodes. While in the full banded group, for CG mode impedance values at E5 differ significantly. Rest for other modes in full banded group, there was no statistically significant difference across the three routes.
The present study supports that there is no statistically significant difference in the intraoperative impedance and ECAP measurements in both, the full-banded and half- banded electrodes across the three surgical routes implying that, all the three surgical approaches provide equal stimulation of the auditory nerve. The CI surgeon can select the electrode insertion portal based on the surgical anatomy, the implant type and individual preferences.
人工耳蜗植入手术通过不同的手术路径进行,即圆窗(RW)、扩展圆窗(Ext RW)和耳蜗造口术(C)。最佳的耳蜗内电极放置对于取得成功的手术效果很重要。术中电生理测试(阻抗和电蜗神经动作电位)对于评估设备功能和合适的电极放置至关重要。电极插入入口的可变性可能会影响神经反应及其特征。
比较三种电极插入路径在听神经刺激方面术中电生理测量值(阻抗和电蜗神经动作电位)的可能差异。
这是一项对印度中部一家三级护理中心47名人工耳蜗植入受者进行的为期4年的回顾性数据分析。根据电极设计,他们大致分为全带电极组和半带电极组。记录两组在三种插入路径下不同刺激模式的术中阻抗,并在E5、E10、E15、E20电极处测量电蜗神经动作电位。
在半带电极组中,所有四个电极在不同刺激模式(CG、MP1、MP2、MP1 + 2)下的阻抗值在各手术路径之间无显著差异。而在全带电极组中,对于CG模式,E5电极处的阻抗值有显著差异。全带电极组中其他模式下,三种路径之间无统计学显著差异。
本研究表明,全带电极组和半带电极组在三种手术路径下的术中阻抗和电蜗神经动作电位测量值均无统计学显著差异,这意味着所有三种手术方法对听神经的刺激是相等的。人工耳蜗植入外科医生可以根据手术解剖结构、植入物类型和个人偏好选择电极插入入口。