Kurien Regi, Varghese Lalee, Cherian Lisa Mary, Inja Ranjeetha Racheal, Thampi Manu, Chowdhary Stuti, Bright Rakesh R, Abraham Lisa, Panicker Raga, Rajendran Nithya, Ganesan Priya, Sahu Shalini, Irodi Aparna, Manesh Abi, Peter Jayanthi, Michael Joy Sarojini, Thomas Meera, Karuppusami Reka, Varghese George M, Rupa Vedantam
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 Tamilnadu India.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 India.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Feb;76(1):611-619. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-04226-x. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
We aimed to compare the demography, clinical profile, histopathology, fungal culture, radiology, surgery performed, medical therapy and outcomes of patients with acute invasive fungal sinusitis seen during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic by retrospectively reviewing their case records. Of 238 patients, 43(18.1%) presented during the first wave and 195(81.9%) during the second wave. Patients seen during the first wave were older (p = 0.04) and more likely to have visual impairment (p = 0.004), frozen eye (p = 0.012), altered sensorium (p = 0.007) and stage 3 disease (p = 0.03). Those seen during the second wave were more often COVID-19 positive and had newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (p = 0.04)and stage 1 disease (p = 0.03). Most patients had a positive culture for Rhizopus species during both waves. Histopathology showed broad aseptate hyphae in all patients but angioinvasion was seen more often during the first wave (p = 0.04). The majority of patients were treated with endoscopic+/- open debridement followed by intravenous amphotericin B and oral posaconazole. While the overall survival rate was similar (first wave 65.1%; second wave 79%; p = 0.106), mortality after discharge was greater during the first wave (11.6% vs 1.5%; p = 0.001). Mortality was higher in patients with stage 3 disease (p = 0.003). Significant differences in clinical presentation, histopathology, radiological stage of disease and post-discharge survival were noted between the two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, the causes for which were multi-factorial.
我们旨在通过回顾性分析病例记录,比较在新冠疫情第一波和第二波期间就诊的急性侵袭性真菌性鼻窦炎患者的人口统计学、临床特征、组织病理学、真菌培养、放射学、手术情况、药物治疗及预后。238例患者中,43例(18.1%)在第一波疫情期间就诊,195例(81.9%)在第二波疫情期间就诊。第一波就诊的患者年龄较大(p = 0.04),更易出现视力障碍(p = 0.004)、眼球固定(p = 0.012)、意识改变(p = 0.007)和3期疾病(p = 0.03)。第二波就诊的患者新冠病毒检测阳性更为常见,且有新诊断的糖尿病(p = 0.04)和1期疾病(p = 0.03)。两波疫情期间大多数患者的根霉属培养结果均为阳性。组织病理学显示所有患者均有宽大无隔菌丝,但血管侵袭在第一波疫情期间更为常见(p = 0.04)。大多数患者接受了内镜下+/-开放性清创术,随后静脉注射两性霉素B和口服泊沙康唑。虽然总体生存率相似(第一波65.1%;第二波79%;p = 0.106),但第一波疫情期间出院后的死亡率更高(11.6%对1.5%;p = 0.001)。3期疾病患者的死亡率更高(p = 0.003)。新冠疫情两波期间在临床表现、组织病理学、疾病放射学分期和出院后生存率方面存在显著差异,其原因是多方面的。