Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e2354488. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54488.
Young children's screen time increased during the COVID-19 lockdown in 2020, but it is unknown whether their screen time returned to prepandemic levels in 2021. Knowledge of the relationship between screen time and child development and health will inform prevention and intervention targets and strategies.
To evaluate screen time by family income and race and ethnicity in the prepandemic (ie, 2018, 2019) and pandemic (ie, 2020, 2021) periods and to examine the relationship between screen time and psychological well-being among young children in the US.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional population-based web or mail survey study of 2018-2021 National Survey of Children's Health participants aged 6 months to 5 years.
Daily screen time (<1, 1, 2, 3, or ≥4 h/d) reported by participants' primary caregivers.
Flourishing and externalizing behaviors, as indicators of psychological well-being. All analyses were weighted, accounting for the complex survey sample design.
Of the 48 775 participants (50.7% female), the proportion of those with high screen time (defined as ≥1 h/d for children aged 6 months-1 year and ≥2 h/d for children aged 2-5 years) was 48.5% (95% CI, 46.3%-50.7%) in 2018, 49.2% (95% CI, 47.0%-51.5%) in 2019, 55.3% (95% CI, 53.4%-57.2%) in 2020, and 50.0% (95% CI, 48.3%-51.6%) in 2021. Among children living in poverty (federal poverty level <100%), the proportion of those with high screen time was 48.7% (95% CI, 42.8%-54.6%) in 2018, 52.0% (95% CI, 45.4%-58.6%) in 2019, 60.9% (95% CI, 55.4%-66.4%) in 2020, and 58.9% (53.7%-64.1%) in 2021. Adjusted odds ratio of flourishing was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.51-0.85), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.66-0.99), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.52-0.88), and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.42-0.69) for less than 1, 2, 3, and 4 or more hours per day vs 1 hour per day of screen time, respectively, among children aged 3 to 5 years. No association between screen time and flourishing was found among children aged 6 months to 2 years. An adjusted externalizing behavior score was higher by 0.2 points (95% CI, -0.1 to 0.5), 0.5 points (95% CI, 0.3 to 0.8), 1.3 points (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.6), and 2.1 points (95% CI, 1.7 to 2.5) for less than 1, 2, 3, and 4 or more hours per day vs 1 hour per day of screen time, respectively, among children aged 3 to 5 years.
In this multiyear cross-sectional study of a representative sample of young children in the US, the increased prevalence of high screen time in 2020 returned to prepandemic levels in 2021; however, it remained elevated in children living in poverty. Two hours or more of daily screen time was associated with lower psychological well-being among preschool-aged children.
2020 年 COVID-19 封锁期间,儿童的屏幕时间增加,但尚不清楚 2021 年他们的屏幕时间是否已恢复到大流行前的水平。了解屏幕时间与儿童发展和健康之间的关系将为预防和干预目标和策略提供信息。
评估美国儿童在大流行前(即 2018 年、2019 年)和大流行期间(即 2020 年、2021 年)按家庭收入和种族/族裔划分的屏幕时间,并研究屏幕时间与美国幼儿心理健康之间的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项基于人群的横断面网络或邮件调查研究,参与者为 2018-2021 年全国儿童健康调查的 6 个月至 5 岁儿童。
主要照顾者报告的每日屏幕时间(<1、1、2、3 或≥4 h/d)。
作为心理健康指标的繁荣和外化行为。所有分析均经过加权处理,考虑了复杂的调查样本设计。
在 48775 名参与者(50.7%为女性)中,高屏幕时间(6 个月至 1 岁儿童定义为≥1 h/d,2 至 5 岁儿童定义为≥2 h/d)的比例在 2018 年为 48.5%(95%CI,46.3%-50.7%),2019 年为 49.2%(95%CI,47.0%-51.5%),2020 年为 55.3%(95%CI,53.4%-57.2%),2021 年为 50.0%(95%CI,48.3%-51.6%)。在贫困家庭(联邦贫困线低于 100%)中,高屏幕时间的比例在 2018 年为 48.7%(95%CI,42.8%-54.6%),2019 年为 52.0%(95%CI,45.4%-58.6%),2020 年为 60.9%(95%CI,55.4%-66.4%),2021 年为 58.9%(53.7%-64.1%)。3 至 5 岁儿童每天屏幕时间少于 1、2、3 或 4 小时或以上与 1 小时相比,调整后的繁荣比值分别为 0.66(95%CI,0.51-0.85)、0.81(95%CI,0.66-0.99)、0.68(95%CI,0.52-0.88)和 0.53(95%CI,0.42-0.69)。在 6 个月至 2 岁的儿童中,屏幕时间与繁荣之间没有关联。3 至 5 岁儿童每天屏幕时间少于 1、2、3 或 4 小时或以上与 1 小时相比,调整后的外化行为评分分别高 0.2 分(95%CI,-0.1 至 0.5)、0.5 分(95%CI,0.3 至 0.8)、1.3 分(95%CI,1.0 至 1.6)和 2.1 分(95%CI,1.7 至 2.5)。
在这项针对美国代表性幼儿样本的多年跨横断面研究中,2020 年高屏幕时间的流行率有所增加,已恢复到大流行前的水平,但在贫困家庭中仍居高不下。每天屏幕时间超过两小时与学龄前儿童心理健康状况下降有关。