Kwon Soyang, Shin Euisung D, Bartell Tami R, Capan Selin
Buehler Center for Health Policy and Economics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454516. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54516.
Literature suggests that well-being and health status differ by generational status among Asian American individuals.
To compare young children's well-being and health behaviors and their parents' parenting practices among families of second-generation Asian American, third- or later-generation Asian American, and third- or later-generation non-Hispanic White children in the US.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: For this survey study, secondary data analysis was conducted from September 2, 2023, to June 19, 2024, using data from the 2018 to 2022 National Survey of Children's Health participants aged 6 months to 5 years. Parents completed a survey about their positive parenting practices and their child's psychological well-being and health behaviors via mail or online. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were conducted to compare psychological well-being and health behaviors by study groups and positive parenting practices, adjusting for sociodemographic variables.
Positive parenting practices (ie, reading, storytelling or singing, and family meals), psychological well-being (ie, flourishing, social-emotional development, and self-regulation), and health behaviors.
The analysis included 42 846 participants (5456 in 2018, 5140 in 2019, 7494 in 2020, 12 817 in 2021, and 11 939 in 2022; 46.6% female and 53.4% male). Participants were categorized into 3 groups: 2881 (6.7%) were second-generation Asian American children aged 0 to 5 years, 570 (1.3%) third- or later-generation Asian American children aged 0 to 5 years, and 39 395 (92.0%) third- or later-generation non-Hispanic White children aged 0 to 5 years. Compared with White children, Asian American children were less likely to flourish (odds ratio [OR], 0.57 [95% CI, 0.52-0.63] for second-generation Asian American; OR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.65-1.03] for third- or later-generation Asian American), have regular bedtimes (OR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.69-0.92] for second-generation Asian American; OR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.49-0.88] for third- or later-generation Asian American), and have moderate screen time (OR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.84-1.00] for second-generation Asian American; OR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.69-0.97] for third- or later-generation Asian American). Results for regular reading and storytelling or singing were the lowest among second-generation Asian American children (1430 [49.6%] for reading and 1629 [56.5%] for storytelling or singing), followed by the third- or later-generation Asian American children (376 [66.0%] for reading and 412 [72.3%] for storytelling or singing) and than White children (28 628 [72.7%] for reading and 30 375 [77.1%] for storytelling or singing) (P < .001). Results for family meals were similar between second-generation (2356 [81.8%]) and third- or later-generation (467 [81.9%]) Asian American children; however, both were significantly lower than for White children (33 928 [86.1%]) (P < .001). All 3 positive parenting practices were positively associated with children's psychological well-being and health behaviors.
This survey study of young children found lower likelihoods of flourishing, regular bedtimes, and moderate screen time among Asian American children compared with non-Hispanic White children in the US. Reading and storytelling or singing parenting practices, which were associated with children's well-being and health behaviors, were particularly less frequent among parents of second-generation Asian American children than those of third- or later-generation Asian American children. Promotion of these practices among Asian immigrant parents may help improve the psychological well-being and health behaviors of their young Asian American children.
文献表明,在美国亚裔个体中,幸福和健康状况因代际地位而异。
比较美国第二代亚裔美国人家庭、第三代或更晚代亚裔美国人家庭以及第三代或更晚代非西班牙裔白人儿童家庭中幼儿的幸福和健康行为及其父母的养育方式。
设计、背景和参与者:对于这项调查研究,于2023年9月2日至2024年6月19日进行了二次数据分析,使用了2018年至2022年全国儿童健康调查中6个月至5岁参与者的数据。父母通过邮件或在线方式完成了一项关于他们积极养育方式、孩子的心理健康和健康行为的调查。进行了多变量逻辑回归和线性回归分析,以比较各研究组的心理健康和健康行为以及积极养育方式,并对社会人口统计学变量进行了调整。
积极养育方式(即阅读、讲故事或唱歌以及家庭聚餐)、心理健康(即蓬勃发展、社会情感发展和自我调节)以及健康行为。
分析纳入了42846名参与者(2018年5456名、2019年5140名、2020年7494名、2021年12817名、2022年11939名;46.6%为女性,53.4%为男性)。参与者被分为3组:2881名(6.7%)为0至5岁的第二代亚裔美国儿童,570名(1.3%)为0至5岁的第三代或更晚代亚裔美国儿童,39395名(92.0%)为0至5岁的第三代或更晚代非西班牙裔白人儿童。与白人儿童相比,亚裔美国儿童蓬勃发展的可能性较低(第二代亚裔美国人的优势比[OR]为0.57[95%置信区间,0.52 - 0.63];第三代或更晚代亚裔美国人为0.82[95%置信区间,0.65 - 1.03]),有规律就寝时间的可能性较低(第二代亚裔美国人为0.80[95%置信区间,0.69 - 0.92];第三代或更晚代亚裔美国人为0.66[95%置信区间,0.49 - 0.88]),以及适度使用电子设备时间的可能性较低(第二代亚裔美国人为0.92[95%置信区间,0.84 - (此处原文有误,应为1.00)];第三代或更晚代亚裔美国人为0.82[95%置信区间,0.69 - 0.97])。第二代亚裔美国儿童中定期阅读和讲故事或唱歌的比例最低(阅读为1430名[49.6%],讲故事或唱歌为1629名[56.5%]),其次是第三代或更晚代亚裔美国儿童(阅读为376名[6,此处原文有误,应为66.0%],讲故事或唱歌为412名[72.3%]),低于白人儿童(阅读为28628名[72.7%],讲故事或唱歌为30375名[77.1%])(P <.001)。第二代(2356名[81.8%])和第三代或更晚代(467名[81.9%])亚裔美国儿童的家庭聚餐情况相似;然而,两者均显著低于白人儿童(33928名[86.1%])(P <.001)。所有3种积极养育方式均与儿童的心理健康和健康行为呈正相关。
这项针对幼儿的调查研究发现,与美国非西班牙裔白人儿童相比,亚裔美国儿童蓬勃发展、有规律就寝时间和适度使用电子设备时间的可能性较低。与儿童的幸福和健康行为相关的阅读和讲故事或唱歌的养育方式,在第二代亚裔美国儿童的父母中尤其不如第三代或更晚代亚裔美国儿童的父母频繁。在亚裔移民父母中推广这些做法可能有助于改善他们年幼的亚裔美国儿童的心理健康和健康行为。