Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, New South Wales, 2109, Australia.
Drug Saf. 2024 Jun;47(6):545-556. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01408-6. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
Limited evidence exists regarding medication administration errors (MAEs) on general paediatric wards or associated risk factors exists.
The aim of this study was to identify nurse, medication, and work-environment factors associated with MAEs among paediatric inpatients.
This was a prospective, direct observational study of 298 nurses in a paediatric referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. Trained observers recorded details of 5137 doses prepared and administered to 1530 children between 07:00 h and 22:00 h on weekdays and weekends. Observation data were compared with medication charts to identify errors. Clinical errors, potential severity and actual harm were assessed. Nurse characteristics (e.g. age, sex, experience), medication type (route, high-risk medications, use of solvent/diluent), and work variables (e.g. time of administration, weekday/weekend, use of an electronic medication management system [eMM], presence of a parent/carer) were collected. Multivariable models assessed MAE risk factors for any error, errors by route, potentially serious errors, and errors involving high-risk medication or causing actual harm.
Errors occurred in 37.0% (n = 1899; 95% confidence interval [CI] 35.7-38.3) of administrations, 25.8% (n = 489; 95% CI 23.8-27.9) of which were rated as potentially serious. Intravenous infusions and injections had high error rates (64.7% [n = 514], 95% CI 61.3-68.0; and 77.4% [n = 188], 95% CI 71.7-82.2, respectively). For intravenous injections, 59.7% (95% CI 53.4-65.6) had potentially serious errors. No nurse characteristics were associated with MAEs. Intravenous route, early morning and weekend administrations, patient age ≥ 11 years, oral medications requiring solvents/diluents and eMM use were all significant risk factors. MAEs causing actual harm were 45% lower using an eMM compared with paper charts.
Medication error prevention strategies should target intravenous administrations and not neglect older children in hospital. Attention to nurses' work environments, including improved design and integration of medication technologies, is warranted.
关于普通儿科病房的用药错误(MAE)和相关危险因素,证据有限。
本研究旨在确定与儿科住院患者 MAE 相关的护士、药物和工作环境因素。
这是一项在澳大利亚悉尼一家儿科转诊医院进行的 298 名护士的前瞻性、直接观察研究。经过培训的观察员记录了 1530 名儿童在工作日和周末 07:00 至 22:00 之间接受 5137 次剂量的准备和给药的详细信息。观察数据与药物图表进行比较,以识别错误。评估临床错误、潜在严重程度和实际伤害。收集护士特征(如年龄、性别、经验)、药物类型(途径、高危药物、溶剂/稀释剂的使用)和工作变量(如给药时间、工作日/周末、使用电子药物管理系统[emM]、父母/照顾者在场)。多变量模型评估了任何错误、按途径发生的错误、潜在严重错误以及涉及高危药物或造成实际伤害的错误的 MAE 危险因素。
在 37.0%(n=1899;95%置信区间[CI] 35.7-38.3)的给药中出现错误,其中 25.8%(n=489;95%CI 23.8-27.9)被评为潜在严重。静脉输液和注射的错误率很高(64.7%[n=514],95%CI 61.3-68.0;和 77.4%[n=188],95%CI 71.7-82.2,分别)。对于静脉注射,59.7%(95%CI 53.4-65.6)存在潜在严重错误。护士特征与 MAE 无关。静脉途径、清晨和周末给药、年龄≥11 岁的患者、需要溶剂/稀释剂的口服药物和 emM 使用都是显著的危险因素。与使用纸质图表相比,使用 emM 可使实际伤害造成的 MAE 降低 45%。
药物错误预防策略应针对静脉给药,而不能忽视住院的大龄儿童。需要关注护士的工作环境,包括改善药物技术的设计和整合。