• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信任嵌入式共同设计以促进创新和变革:考虑高级领导和管理者的角色。

Trust in embedding co-design for innovation and change: considering the role of senior leaders and managers.

机构信息

School of Population Health, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Graduate School of Healthcare Management, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Feb 21;38(9):36-44. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2023-0207.

DOI:10.1108/JHOM-07-2023-0207
PMID:38448232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10945738/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In this viewpoint article, the authors recognize the increased focus in health systems on co-design for innovation and change. This article explores the role of leaders and mangers in developing and enhancing a culture of trust in their organizations to enable co-design, with the potential to drive innovation and change in healthcare.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Using social science analyses, the authors argue that current co-design literature has limited focus on interactions between senior leaders and managers, and healthcare staff and service users in supporting co-designed innovation and change. The authors draw on social and health science studies of trust to highlight how the value-based co-design process needs to be supported and enhanced. We outline what co-design innovation and change involve in a health system, conceptualize trust and reflect on its importance within the health system, and finally note the role of senior leaders and managers in supporting trust and responsiveness for co-designed innovation and change.

FINDINGS

Healthcare needs leaders and managers to embrace co-design that drives innovation now and in the future through people - leading to better healthcare for society at large. As authors we argue that it is now the time to shift our focus on the role of senior managers and leaders to embed co-design into health and social care structures, through creating and nurturing a culture of trust.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Building public trust in the health system and interpersonal trust within the health system is an ongoing process that relies upon personal behavior of managers and senior leaders, organizational practices within the system, as well as political processes that underpin these practices. By implementing managerial, leadership and individual practices on all levels, senior managers and leaders provide a mechanism to increase both trust and responsiveness for co-design that supports innovation and change in the health system.

摘要

目的

在这篇观点文章中,作者认识到卫生系统对合作设计创新和变革的关注度日益提高。本文探讨了领导者和管理者在发展和加强组织信任文化方面的作用,以使合作设计能够促进医疗保健领域的创新和变革。

设计/方法/方法:利用社会科学分析,作者认为当前的合作设计文献对高级领导者和管理者与医疗保健人员和服务用户之间在支持合作设计创新和变革方面的相互作用关注有限。作者借鉴了关于信任的社会和健康科学研究,强调了基于价值的合作设计过程需要得到支持和加强。我们概述了卫生系统中合作设计创新和变革所涉及的内容,概念化了信任,并反思了其在卫生系统中的重要性,最后指出了高级领导者和管理者在支持合作设计创新和变革的信任和响应能力方面的作用。

发现

医疗保健需要领导者和管理者通过以人为本的合作设计来推动现在和未来的创新,从而为整个社会带来更好的医疗保健。作为作者,我们认为现在是时候将我们的注意力转移到高级管理人员和领导者的角色上,通过创建和培养信任文化,将合作设计嵌入到卫生和社会保健结构中。

原创性/价值:在卫生系统中建立公众对卫生系统的信任和人际信任是一个持续的过程,依赖于管理人员和高级领导者的个人行为、系统内的组织实践以及支撑这些实践的政治进程。通过在各个层面实施管理、领导和个人实践,高级管理人员和领导者为合作设计提供了一种机制,以增加信任和响应能力,从而支持卫生系统的创新和变革。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b23c/10945738/439b1d6d8e24/jhealthorganmanag-38-0036-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b23c/10945738/439b1d6d8e24/jhealthorganmanag-38-0036-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b23c/10945738/439b1d6d8e24/jhealthorganmanag-38-0036-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Trust in embedding co-design for innovation and change: considering the role of senior leaders and managers.信任嵌入式共同设计以促进创新和变革:考虑高级领导和管理者的角色。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Feb 21;38(9):36-44. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2023-0207.
2
Allied health front-line manager perceptions of factors impacting workplace morale and burnout risk.医疗辅助一线管理人员对影响工作场所士气和倦怠风险因素的看法。
J Health Organ Manag. 2022 Jun 22;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-09-2021-0355.
3
Exploring senior nurses' experiences of leading organizational change.探索资深护士引领组织变革的经历。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2016;29(1):37-51. doi: 10.1108/LHS-03-2015-0005.
4
Making sense of effective partnerships among senior leaders in the National Health Service.理解国家卫生服务体系中高级领导人之间的有效伙伴关系。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2019 Oct/Dec;44(4):318-331. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000166.
5
Leading through the first wave of COVID: a Canadian action research study.引领度过 COVID-19 第一波疫情:一项加拿大行动研究。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2021 Dec 15;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/LHS-05-2021-0042.
6
Healthcare leadership with political astuteness (HeLPA): a qualitative study of how service leaders understand and mediate the informal 'power and politics' of major health system change.具备政治敏锐性的医疗保健领导力(HeLPA):一项关于服务领导者如何理解和调解重大卫生系统变革中的非正式“权力与政治”的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 3;18(1):918. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3728-z.
7
Leadership experiences and practices of South African health managers: what is the influence of gender? -a qualitative, exploratory study.南非卫生管理人员的领导经验和实践:性别有何影响?——一项定性、探索性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Sep 18;17(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0859-0.
8
Location-independent leadership: managers' experiences leading prehospital emergency care in Sweden - a qualitative study.地点无关型领导力:瑞典管理人员在院前急救中的领导经验——一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 17;25(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12433-1.
9
Clinical nursing leaders', team members' and service managers' experiences of implementing evidence at a local level.临床护理领导者、团队成员和服务经理在本地实施证据的经验。
J Nurs Manag. 2011 May;19(4):542-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01258.x.
10
Values based decision making: a tool for achieving the goals of healthcare.基于价值观的决策:实现医疗保健目标的一种工具。
HEC Forum. 2005 Mar;17(1):18-32. doi: 10.1007/s10730-005-4948-2.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 and healthcare worker mental well-being: Comparative case studies on interventions in six countries.COVID-19 和医护人员心理健康:六个国家干预措施的对比案例研究。
Health Policy. 2023 Sep;135:104863. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104863. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
2
Exploring the psychological impact of contact tracing work on staff during the COVID-19 pandemic.探讨 COVID-19 大流行期间接触者追踪工作对工作人员的心理影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09566-6.
3
Building trusting relationships to support implementation: A proposed theoretical model.
建立信任关系以支持实施:一个拟议的理论模型。
Front Health Serv. 2022 Sep 23;2:894599. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.894599. eCollection 2022.
4
'Language has been granted too much power'.  Challenging the power of words with time and flexibility in the precommencement stage of research involving those with cognitive impairment.“语言被赋予了太多的权力”。在涉及认知障碍者的研究的预启动阶段,通过时间和灵活性来挑战语言的力量。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):2609-2613. doi: 10.1111/hex.13576. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
5
Developing competence in interprofessional collaboration within integrated care teams for older people in the Republic of Ireland: A starter kit.爱尔兰共和国为老年人综合护理团队培养跨专业协作能力:入门指南。
J Interprof Care. 2023 May-Jun;37(3):480-490. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2075332. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
6
Social factors associated with trust in the health system in northern Sweden: a cross-sectional study.与瑞典北部的医疗体系信任相关的社会因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 4;22(1):881. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13332-4.
7
Conceptualising, operationalising, and measuring trust in participatory health research networks: a scoping review.概念化、操作化和衡量参与式健康研究网络中的信任:范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 6;11(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01910-x.
8
Achieving change readiness for health service innovations.实现卫生服务创新的变革准备就绪。
Nurs Forum. 2022 Jul;57(4):603-607. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12713. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
9
Is Gaining Affective Commitment the Missing Strategy for Successful Change Management in Healthcare?获得情感承诺是医疗保健领域成功变革管理缺失的策略吗?
J Healthc Leadersh. 2022 Jan 19;14:1-4. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S347987. eCollection 2022.
10
What does co-design mean for Australia’s diverse clinical workforce?共同设计对澳大利亚多样化的临床劳动力意味着什么?
Aust Health Rev. 2022 Feb;46(1):60-61. doi: 10.1071/AH21116.