Pierotti Livia, Cooper Jennifer, James Charlotte, Cassels Kenah, Gara Emma, Denholm Rachel, Wood Richard
NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2024 Mar 7;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13033-024-00623-z.
COVID-19 has had a significant impact on people's mental health and mental health services. During the first year of the pandemic, existing demand was not fully met while new demand was generated, resulting in large numbers of people requiring support. To support mental health services to recover without being overwhelmed, it was important to know where services will experience increased pressure, and what strategies could be implemented to mitigate this.
We implemented a computer simulation model of patient flow through an integrated mental health service in Southwest England covering General Practice (GP), community-based 'talking therapies' (IAPT), acute hospital care, and specialist care settings. The model was calibrated on data from 1 April 2019 to 1 April 2021. Model parameters included patient demand, service-level length of stay, and probabilities of transitioning to other care settings. We used the model to compare 'do nothing' (baseline) scenarios to 'what if' (mitigation) scenarios, including increasing capacity and reducing length of stay, for two future demand trajectories from 1 April 2021 onwards.
The results from the simulation model suggest that, without mitigation, the impact of COVID-19 will be an increase in pressure on GP and specialist community based services by 50% and 50-100% respectively. Simulating the impact of possible mitigation strategies, results show that increasing capacity in lower-acuity services, such as GP, causes a shift in demand to other parts of the mental health system while decreasing length of stay in higher acuity services is insufficient to mitigate the impact of increased demand.
In capturing the interrelation of patient flow related dynamics between various mental health care settings, we demonstrate the value of computer simulation for assessing the impact of interventions on system flow.
新冠疫情对人们的心理健康及心理健康服务产生了重大影响。在疫情的第一年,既有需求未得到充分满足,同时又产生了新的需求,导致大量人群需要支持。为了支持心理健康服务恢复且不不堪重负,了解哪些服务将面临更大压力以及可以实施哪些策略来缓解这种压力非常重要。
我们实施了一个计算机模拟模型,该模型模拟了英格兰西南部综合心理健康服务体系中的患者流动情况,该体系涵盖全科医疗(GP)、社区“谈话疗法”(IAPT)、急性医院护理和专科护理机构。该模型依据2019年4月1日至2021年4月1日的数据进行了校准。模型参数包括患者需求、服务层面的住院时长以及转至其他护理机构的概率。我们使用该模型将“不作为”(基线)情景与“假设”(缓解)情景进行比较,其中“假设”情景包括增加服务能力和缩短住院时长,针对2021年4月1日之后的两种未来需求轨迹。
模拟模型的结果表明,若不采取缓解措施,新冠疫情的影响将分别使全科医疗和专科社区服务的压力增加50%和50%-100%。模拟可能的缓解策略的影响后,结果显示,增加低急症服务(如全科医疗)的能力会导致需求转移至心理健康系统的其他部分,而缩短高急症服务的住院时长不足以缓解需求增加带来的影响。
在捕捉不同心理健康护理机构之间患者流动相关动态的相互关系时,我们证明了计算机模拟在评估干预措施对系统流程影响方面的价值。