Cui Lixia, He Fan, Han Zuye, Yang Ranming, Xiao Jing, Oei Tian P S
Int J Group Psychother. 2016 Apr;66(2):291-307. doi: 10.1080/00207284.2015.1111098. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
Depression is a problem among college students in China. Yet the use of preventative group cognitive-behavioral (CB) intervention is rare. One hundred and eighty Chinese college students who were identified as being at risk for depression were randomly assigned to three groups: 1) a brief group cognitive-behavioral (CB) intervention, 2) a supportive group (SG) intervention, and 3) a wait-list control condition. The Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and the Chinese College Student Adjustment Scale (CCSAS) were administered at pre-test, post-test, and six-month follow-up. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) conducted among the three groups revealed that the CB group demonstrated significantly less increase in measures of primary symptoms of anxiety and depression than the wait-list controls at post-test and six-month follow-up. The prevention effect of the SG group was significant only at the six-month follow-up. CB participants also showed significantly greater improvements in social adjustment than did SG participants and controls at the post-test and six-month follow-up.
抑郁症在中国大学生中是个问题。然而，预防性团体认知行为（CB）干预的应用却很少见。180名被确定有抑郁风险的中国大学生被随机分为三组：1）简短团体认知行为（CB）干预组，2）支持性团体（SG）干预组，3）等待名单对照组。在测试前、测试后和六个月随访时使用zung自评抑郁量表（SDS）、zung自评焦虑量表（SAS）和中国大学生适应量表（CCSAS）。对三组进行的方差分析（ANOVA）显示，在测试后和六个月随访时，CB组在焦虑和抑郁主要症状测量方面的增加显著少于等待名单对照组。SG组的预防效果仅在六个月随访时显著。在测试后和六个月随访时，CB组参与者在社会适应方面的改善也显著大于SG组参与者和对照组。
