• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与阅读疗法和宣传册对照相比,认知行为团体抑郁症预防:在针对大学生的初步有效性试验中效果不显著。

Cognitive-behavioral group depression prevention compared to bibliotherapy and brochure control: nonsignificant effects in pilot effectiveness trial with college students.

作者信息

Rohde Paul, Stice Eric, Shaw Heather, Gau Jeff M

机构信息

Oregon Research Institute, 1776 Millrace Drive, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.

Oregon Research Institute, 1776 Millrace Drive, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Ther. 2014 Apr;55:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2014.02.003
PMID:24655464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3990276/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Conduct a pilot trial testing whether a brief cognitive-behavioral (CB) group reduced depressive symptoms and secondary outcomes relative to bibliotherapy and brochure controls in college students with elevated depressive symptoms.

METHOD

82 college students (M age=19.0, SD=0.9; 70% female, 80% White) with elevated self-assessed depressive symptoms were randomized to a 6-session CB group, bibliotherapy, or educational brochure control condition, completing assessments at pretest, posttest, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Planned contrasts found no significant effects for CB group on depressive symptoms compared to either bibliotherapy or brochure controls at posttest (d=-.08 and .06, respectively) or over follow-up (d=-.04 and -.10, respectively). There were no intervention effects for social adjustment and substance use, though CB group participants had improved knowledge of CB concepts at posttest, versus brochure controls. Condition differences in major depression onset were nonsignificant but suggested support for CB interventions (CB group=7.4%, bibliotherapy=4.5%, brochure control=15.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Unexpectedly modest support was found for a brief CB group depression prevention intervention, compared to bibliotherapy or brochure control, when provided to self-selected college students, suggesting that alternative screening or interventions approaches are needed for this population.

摘要

目的

开展一项试点试验,测试与阅读疗法及宣传手册对照相比,简短的认知行为(CB)小组干预能否减轻抑郁症状及大学生抑郁症状加重时的次要结果。

方法

82名自我评估抑郁症状加重的大学生(平均年龄=19.0,标准差=0.9;70%为女性,80%为白人)被随机分配至6节CB小组干预、阅读疗法或教育宣传手册对照组,在预测试、后测试以及6个月和12个月随访时完成评估。

结果

计划对比发现,与阅读疗法或宣传手册对照相比,CB小组在后测试时(效应量分别为-.08和.06)或随访期间(效应量分别为-.04和-.10)对抑郁症状无显著影响。社会适应和物质使用方面无干预效果,不过与宣传手册对照相比,CB小组参与者在后测试时对CB概念的了解有所改善。重度抑郁症发作的条件差异不显著,但表明对CB干预有支持作用(CB小组=7.4%,阅读疗法=4.5%,宣传手册对照=15.2%)。

结论

当对自我选择的大学生提供简短的CB小组抑郁症预防干预时,与阅读疗法或宣传手册对照相比,意外发现支持力度不大,这表明该人群需要其他筛查或干预方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5604/3990276/4b6fada15585/nihms571125f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5604/3990276/4b6fada15585/nihms571125f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5604/3990276/4b6fada15585/nihms571125f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Cognitive-behavioral group depression prevention compared to bibliotherapy and brochure control: nonsignificant effects in pilot effectiveness trial with college students.与阅读疗法和宣传册对照相比,认知行为团体抑郁症预防:在针对大学生的初步有效性试验中效果不显著。
Behav Res Ther. 2014 Apr;55:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
2
Effectiveness trial of an indicated cognitive-behavioral group adolescent depression prevention program versus bibliotherapy and brochure control at 1- and 2-year follow-up.一项针对青少年抑郁症的指导性认知行为团体预防项目与阅读疗法及宣传手册对照干预的有效性试验,随访1年和2年。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Aug;83(4):736-47. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000022. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
3
Indicated cognitive behavioral group depression prevention compared to bibliotherapy and brochure control: acute effects of an effectiveness trial with adolescents.与阅读疗法和宣传册对照相比,认知行为团体抑郁症预防的有效性:一项针对青少年的有效性试验的急性效应
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Feb;82(1):65-74. doi: 10.1037/a0034640. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
4
Pilot trial of a dissonance-based cognitive-behavioral group depression prevention with college students.一项针对大学生的基于认知失调的认知行为团体抑郁症预防试验性研究。
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Jul;82:21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 3.
5
Moderators of two indicated cognitive-behavioral depression prevention approaches for adolescents in a school-based effectiveness trial.在一项基于学校的有效性试验中,针对青少年的两种指定认知行为抑郁症预防方法的调节因素。
Behav Res Ther. 2014 Feb;53:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
6
Moderators of the effects of indicated group and bibliotherapy cognitive behavioral depression prevention programs on adolescents' depressive symptoms and depressive disorder onset.指定小组和阅读疗法认知行为抑郁预防项目对青少年抑郁症状和抑郁症发作影响的调节因素。
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Dec;75:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
7
Reduced substance use as a secondary benefit of an indicated cognitive-behavioral adolescent depression prevention program.作为一项有针对性的认知行为青少年抑郁预防计划的次要益处,物质使用减少。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Sep;26(3):599-608. doi: 10.1037/a0028269. Epub 2012 May 7.
8
Major depression prevention effects for a cognitive-behavioral adolescent indicated prevention group intervention across four trials.四项试验表明,认知行为青少年指示性预防组干预对预防重度抑郁症有显著效果。
Behav Res Ther. 2018 Jan;100:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
9
Efficacy trial of a brief cognitive-behavioral depression prevention program for high-risk adolescents: effects at 1- and 2-year follow-up.一项针对高风险青少年的简短认知行为抑郁预防计划的疗效试验:1 年和 2 年随访的效果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Dec;78(6):856-67. doi: 10.1037/a0020544.
10
Brief cognitive-behavioral depression prevention program for high-risk adolescents outperforms two alternative interventions: a randomized efficacy trial.针对高危青少年的简短认知行为抑郁预防项目优于两种替代干预措施:一项随机疗效试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Aug;76(4):595-606. doi: 10.1037/a0012645.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural interventions based on delivery features for elevated symptoms of depression in adolescents: A systematic review.基于交付特征的认知行为干预对青少年抑郁症状加重的有效性比较:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 7;20(1):e1376. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1376. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Psychotherapy for depression in college students: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.大学生抑郁症的心理治疗:系统评价与网状Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 25;99(39):e22344. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022344.
3
Psychological interventions for co-occurring depression and substance use disorders.

本文引用的文献

1
Indicated cognitive behavioral group depression prevention compared to bibliotherapy and brochure control: acute effects of an effectiveness trial with adolescents.与阅读疗法和宣传册对照相比,认知行为团体抑郁症预防的有效性:一项针对青少年的有效性试验的急性效应
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Feb;82(1):65-74. doi: 10.1037/a0034640. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
2
Reduced substance use as a secondary benefit of an indicated cognitive-behavioral adolescent depression prevention program.作为一项有针对性的认知行为青少年抑郁预防计划的次要益处,物质使用减少。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Sep;26(3):599-608. doi: 10.1037/a0028269. Epub 2012 May 7.
3
针对并发抑郁症和物质使用障碍的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 26;2019(11):CD009501. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009501.pub2.
4
Enduring effects of a 5-week behavioral activation program for subthreshold depression among late adolescents: an exploratory randomized controlled trial.一项针对青少年晚期亚阈值抑郁的为期5周行为激活计划的持久效果:一项探索性随机对照试验。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Oct 9;14:2633-2641. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S172385. eCollection 2018.
5
Effects of mental health interventions for students in higher education are sustainable over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.高等教育学生心理健康干预的效果随时间推移具有可持续性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
PeerJ. 2018 Apr 2;6:e4598. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4598. eCollection 2018.
6
Major depression prevention effects for a cognitive-behavioral adolescent indicated prevention group intervention across four trials.四项试验表明,认知行为青少年指示性预防组干预对预防重度抑郁症有显著效果。
Behav Res Ther. 2018 Jan;100:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
7
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), third-wave CBT and interpersonal therapy (IPT) based interventions for preventing depression in children and adolescents.基于认知行为疗法(CBT)、第三代CBT和人际治疗(IPT)的干预措施,用于预防儿童和青少年的抑郁症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 9;2016(8):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub4.
8
Pilot trial of a dissonance-based cognitive-behavioral group depression prevention with college students.一项针对大学生的基于认知失调的认知行为团体抑郁症预防试验性研究。
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Jul;82:21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 3.
9
Applications of Text Messaging, and Bibliotherapy for Treatment of Patients Affected by Depressive Symptoms.短信及阅读疗法在治疗有抑郁症状患者中的应用。
Int J Prev Med. 2016 Mar 1;7:46. doi: 10.4103/2008-7802.177889. eCollection 2016.
10
PSYCHOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF DEPRESSION IN COLLEGE STUDENTS: A METAANALYSIS.大学生抑郁症的心理治疗:一项元分析
Depress Anxiety. 2016 May;33(5):400-14. doi: 10.1002/da.22461. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
Prevention of depression in the college student population: a review of the literature.
大学生群体的抑郁预防:文献综述。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2012 Feb;26(1):21-42. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Jun 11.
4
Racial/ethnic differences in mental health service use among adolescents with major depression.青少年重度抑郁症患者心理健康服务利用的种族/民族差异。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;50(2):160-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
5
Efficacy trial of a brief cognitive-behavioral depression prevention program for high-risk adolescents: effects at 1- and 2-year follow-up.一项针对高风险青少年的简短认知行为抑郁预防计划的疗效试验:1 年和 2 年随访的效果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Dec;78(6):856-67. doi: 10.1037/a0020544.
6
Evaluating Group-Based Interventions When Control Participants Are Ungrouped.当对照参与者未分组时评估基于小组的干预措施。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2008 Apr 2;43(2):210-236. doi: 10.1080/00273170802034810.
7
A meta-analytic review of depression prevention programs for children and adolescents: factors that predict magnitude of intervention effects.一项针对儿童和青少年抑郁症预防项目的荟萃分析综述:预测干预效果大小的因素。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Jun;77(3):486-503. doi: 10.1037/a0015168.
8
American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment Spring 2008 Reference Group Data Report (abridged): the American College Health Association.美国大学健康协会 - 2008年春季全国大学健康评估参考组数据报告(节略版):美国大学健康协会
J Am Coll Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;57(5):477-88. doi: 10.3200/JACH.57.5.477-488.
9
Brief cognitive-behavioral depression prevention program for high-risk adolescents outperforms two alternative interventions: a randomized efficacy trial.针对高危青少年的简短认知行为抑郁预防项目优于两种替代干预措施:一项随机疗效试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Aug;76(4):595-606. doi: 10.1037/a0012645.
10
Group prevention of depression and anxiety symptoms.抑郁症和焦虑症状的群体预防
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Jun;45(6):1111-26. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.09.010. Epub 2006 Oct 30.