Rohde Paul, Stice Eric, Shaw Heather, Gau Jeff M
Oregon Research Institute.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Aug;83(4):736-47. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000022. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
The main goal of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of a brief group cognitive-behavioral (CB) adolescent depression indicated prevention program through 2-year follow-up, relative to CB bibliotherapy and brochure control, when high school personnel recruited students and delivered the program.
Three hundred seventy-eight adolescents (M age = 15.5, SD = 1.2; 68% female, 72% White) with elevated self-assessed depressive symptoms who were randomized to CB group, CB bibliotherapy, or educational brochure control were assessed at pretest, posttest, and 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month follow-up.
By 2 years postintervention, CB group participants showed significantly lower major depressive disorder (MDD) onset versus CB bibliotherapy (10% vs. 25%, respectively; hazard ratio = 2.48, p = .006), but the incidence difference relative to brochure controls (17%) was nonsignificant; MDD incidence for bibliotherapy and brochure controls did not differ. Although CB group participants showed lower depressive symptoms at posttest versus brochure controls, there were no effects for this outcome or for social adjustment or substance use over 2-year follow-up. Moderator analyses suggested that participants with higher baseline depressive symptoms showed greater long-term symptom reductions in the CB group intervention versus bibliotherapy.
The evidence that a brief CB group intervention delivered by real-world providers significantly reduced MDD onset versus CB bibliotherapy is potentially encouraging. However, the lack of MDD prevention effects relative to brochure control and lack of long-term symptom effects (though consistent with results from other depression prevention trials), suggest that the delivery of the CB group should be refined to strengthen its effectiveness.
本研究的主要目标是,在高中工作人员招募学生并实施该项目的情况下,通过2年的随访,评估一个简短的团体认知行为(CB)青少年抑郁症指示性预防项目相对于CB阅读疗法和宣传手册对照的长期效果。
378名自我评估抑郁症状升高的青少年(平均年龄 = 15.5岁,标准差 = 1.2;68%为女性,72%为白人)被随机分配到CB组、CB阅读疗法组或教育宣传手册对照组,并在预测试、后测试以及6个月、12个月、18个月和24个月的随访中进行评估。
干预后2年,CB组参与者的重度抑郁症(MDD)发病率显著低于CB阅读疗法组(分别为10%和25%;风险比 = 2.48,p = 0.006),但相对于宣传手册对照组(17%)的发病率差异不显著;阅读疗法组和宣传手册对照组的MDD发病率没有差异。尽管CB组参与者在后测试时的抑郁症状低于宣传手册对照组,但在2年的随访中,该结果以及社会适应或物质使用方面均未产生效果。调节分析表明,基线抑郁症状较高的参与者在CB组干预中比阅读疗法组表现出更大的长期症状减轻。
现实世界的提供者实施的简短CB团体干预相对于CB阅读疗法显著降低MDD发病率,这一证据可能令人鼓舞。然而,相对于宣传手册对照缺乏MDD预防效果以及缺乏长期症状效果(尽管与其他抑郁症预防试验的结果一致),表明应改进CB团体干预的实施方式以增强其有效性。