• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Facilitating and Inhibiting Factors of Clinical Knowledge Sharing among Medical Specialists in University Hospitals.大学医院医学专家临床知识共享的促进因素与抑制因素
Int J Prev Med. 2024 Jan 30;14:132. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_143_23. eCollection 2023.
2
Factors Influencing The Participation Of Nurses In Knowledge-Sharing Within Mobile Instant Messaging Based Virtual Communities Of Practice: A Qualitative Content Analysis.影响护士参与基于移动即时通讯的虚拟实践社区知识共享的因素:一项定性内容分析
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Oct 25;10:897-905. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S222779. eCollection 2019.
3
Rocky milieu: challenges of effective integration of clinical risk management into hospitals in Iran. rocky 环境:将临床风险管理有效融入伊朗医院所面临的挑战。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2015 May 11;10:27040. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v10.27040. eCollection 2015.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
6
Effective factors in non-compliance with therapeutic orders of specialists in outpatient clinics in Iran: a qualitative study.伊朗门诊专科医生治疗医嘱不遵从的影响因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4229-4.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Occupational Health Specialists' Knowledge and Application of Pen-and-Paper Observational Methods for Ergonomics Assessment.混合方法研究职业健康专家对笔纸式人体工程学评估观察方法的知识和应用
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2022 Oct-Dec;10(4):182-191. doi: 10.1080/24725838.2022.2138637. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
9
Understanding specialist sharing: A mixed-method exploration in an increasingly price-competitive hospital market.理解专家共享:在竞争日益激烈的医院市场中的混合方法探索。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Aug;162:133-42. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
10
Exploring the Consequences of Early Marriage: A Conventional Content Analysis.探究早婚的后果:一项常规内容分析。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231159963. doi: 10.1177/00469580231159963.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of the factors related to the clinical knowledge sharing: A protocol for systematic review.识别与临床知识共享相关的因素:一项系统评价方案
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Apr 28;11:142. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1287_21. eCollection 2022.
2
Exploring Health Information Sharing Behavior of Chinese Elderly Adults on WeChat.探索中国老年人在微信上的健康信息分享行为。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jul 10;8(3):207. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030207.
3
Intensive care nurses on social media: An exploration of knowledge exchange on an intensive care virtual community of practice.社交媒体上的重症监护护士:对重症监护虚拟实践社区中知识交流的探索。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Apr;29(7-8):1381-1397. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15143. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
4
From strategy to action: a qualitative study on salient factors influencing knowledge transfer in project-based experiential learning in healthcare organisations in Kenya.从策略到行动:肯尼亚基于项目的体验式学习在医疗保健组织中知识转移的显著影响因素的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 30;9(9):e031100. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031100.
5
Writing for publication: Sharing your clinical knowledge and skills.撰写论文发表:分享你的临床知识与技能。
Br J Community Nurs. 2018 Jan 2;23(1):20-23. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2018.23.1.20.
6
Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper.定性内容分析中的方法学挑战:一篇讨论论文。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Sep;56:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
7
Barriers to knowledge sharing in Chinese healthcare referral services: an emergent theoretical model.中国医疗转诊服务中知识共享的障碍:一个新兴的理论模型。
Glob Health Action. 2016 Feb 15;9:29964. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.29964. eCollection 2016.
8
Willingness to Exchange Health Information via Mobile Devices: Findings From a Population-Based Survey.通过移动设备交换健康信息的意愿:基于人群调查的结果。
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;14(1):34-40. doi: 10.1370/afm.1888.
9
Knowledge management practices in healthcare settings: a systematic review.医疗机构中的知识管理实践:一项系统综述
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017 Jan;32(1):4-18. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2303. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
10
User involvement as sharing knowledge - an extended perspective in patient education.患者参与即知识共享——患者教育的拓展视角
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2014 Dec 1;7:551-9. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S73343. eCollection 2014.

大学医院医学专家临床知识共享的促进因素与抑制因素

Facilitating and Inhibiting Factors of Clinical Knowledge Sharing among Medical Specialists in University Hospitals.

作者信息

Mazaheri Elaheh, Alavi Mousa, Samouei Rahele, Ashrafi-Rizi Hasan

机构信息

Student Research Committee, Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Prev Med. 2024 Jan 30;14:132. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_143_23. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_143_23
PMID:38449689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10916407/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical knowledge sharing (CKS) is one of the key points of knowledge management in the field of health and significantly increases the quality of care and patient safety. It also provides the achievement of an efficient system in hospitals and educational and treatment centers involved in clinical processes in order to make the best clinical decisions. The purpose of this research is to identify the factors that facilitate and inhibit CKS among medical specialists in the educational-treatment hospitals in Iran.

METHODS

This was an applied qualitative study with the conventional content analysis method conducted in 2022. The data collection tool was a semi-structured interview. The participants were 13 medical specialists and sub-specialists working in educational-treatment hospitals of the country, who were selected by purposeful and snowball sampling. The method of data analysis was based on Graneheim and Lundman's five-step method, which was followed by codes, sub-categories, main categories, and classifications.

RESULTS

After conducting the interviews and assessing their content, finally, 193 codes were extracted, which were identified in two general classification of facilitating and inhibiting factors with 92 and 101 concepts, respectively. Facilitating factors in the three main categories of "education in the context of culture, society and university", "planning and implementation management", and "behavioral-motivational factors" and inhibiting factors in the four main categories of "infrastructural, policy-making and cultural challenges", "technological and scientific infrastructural challenges", "personality-behavioral challenges", and "financial and non-financial motivations" were classified.

CONCLUSIONS

The participants of the research pointed out the effective role of CKS in keeping them up-to-date in the use of diagnostic, therapeutic, and even drug prescribing methods. According to their belief, knowledge sharing (KS) in the clinical setting will reduce diagnostic errors and cause the primordial prevention of diseases as well as increase the knowledge and awareness of the society members.

摘要

背景

临床知识共享(CKS)是卫生领域知识管理的关键点之一,能显著提高医疗质量和患者安全。它还能在医院以及参与临床过程的教育和治疗中心实现高效系统,以便做出最佳临床决策。本研究的目的是确定伊朗教育治疗医院的医学专家中促进和抑制临床知识共享的因素。

方法

这是一项于2022年采用传统内容分析法进行的应用定性研究。数据收集工具是半结构化访谈。参与者是该国教育治疗医院的13名医学专家和亚专科医生,通过目的抽样和滚雪球抽样选取。数据分析方法基于格兰海姆和伦德曼的五步方法,之后是编码、子类别、主要类别和分类。

结果

在进行访谈并评估其内容后,最终提取了193个编码,分别在促进因素和抑制因素的两个总体分类中确定,促进因素有92个概念,抑制因素有101个概念。促进因素分为“文化、社会和大学背景下的教育”“规划与实施管理”“行为动机因素”这三个主要类别,抑制因素分为“基础设施、政策制定和文化挑战”“技术和科学基础设施挑战”“个性行为挑战”“财务和非财务动机”这四个主要类别。

结论

研究参与者指出临床知识共享在使他们了解诊断、治疗甚至药物处方方法的最新情况方面发挥了有效作用。根据他们的信念,临床环境中的知识共享(KS)将减少诊断错误,实现疾病的一级预防,并提高社会成员的知识和意识。