• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别与临床知识共享相关的因素:一项系统评价方案

Identification of the factors related to the clinical knowledge sharing: A protocol for systematic review.

作者信息

Mazaheri Elaheh, Samouei Rahele, Alavi Mousa, Kelishadi Roya, Ashrafi-Rizi Hasan

机构信息

Health Information Technology Research Center, Student Research Committee, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Apr 28;11:142. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1287_21. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1287_21
PMID:35677256
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9170196/
Abstract

Today, the ability of the organizations to successfully knowledge management and sharing can help them in better performance. Effective knowledge sharing (KS) in the clinical context provides better clinical decisions and improves the quality of care services. This systematic review will be conducted to identify the factors related to the clinical KS (CKS). This systematic literature review will be conducted to search the published documents about the affecting factors on the (clinical) KS. To this end, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane, Embase, SID, Magiran, IranDoc, and ISC will be thoroughly assessed with considered keywords and search strategy. No time limit will be considered and all relevant documents published will be evaluated until the start date of the search. To the best of our knowledge, no systematic review study has been conducted on the factors related to CKS and our research will try to comprehensively extract the effective factors in this topic. Identifying the factors affecting CKS will lead to transparency in the exchange and interpretation of clinical knowledge in clinical care delivery and making the best clinical decisions as well as improving the quality of clinical care. It will also provide a condition to facilitate the delivery of more effective clinical education for policymakers in the field of clinical education.

摘要

如今,组织成功进行知识管理和共享的能力有助于提升其绩效。临床环境中的有效知识共享(KS)能做出更好的临床决策并提高护理服务质量。本系统评价旨在确定与临床知识共享(CKS)相关的因素。将进行该系统文献综述以检索已发表的关于(临床)KS影响因素的文献。为此,将使用选定的关键词和检索策略对PubMed、Scopus、科学网、ProQuest、Cochrane、Embase、SID、Magiran、IranDoc和ISC进行全面评估。不设时间限制,将对所有已发表的相关文献进行评估,直至检索开始日期。据我们所知,尚未有关于CKS相关因素的系统评价研究,我们的研究将试图全面提取该主题中的有效因素。确定影响CKS的因素将使临床护理中临床知识的交流和解释更加透明,有助于做出最佳临床决策并提高临床护理质量。这也将为临床教育领域的政策制定者提供条件,以促进开展更有效的临床教育。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a606/9170196/35a95963c236/JEHP-11-142-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a606/9170196/35a95963c236/JEHP-11-142-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a606/9170196/35a95963c236/JEHP-11-142-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Identification of the factors related to the clinical knowledge sharing: A protocol for systematic review.识别与临床知识共享相关的因素:一项系统评价方案
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Apr 28;11:142. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1287_21. eCollection 2022.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
5
Factors influencing knowledge sharing between scientific specialists in knowledge networks and communities of practice: A systematic literature review.影响知识网络和实践社区中科学专家之间知识共享的因素:一项系统的文献综述。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Apr 29;13:136. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_280_23. eCollection 2024.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Effect of attachment-based interventions on prenatal attachment: a protocol for systematic review.基于依恋的干预措施对产前依恋的影响:系统评价方案。
Reprod Health. 2019 Apr 5;16(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0704-y.
8
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
9
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
10
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.

引用本文的文献

1
Response to "Clinical knowledge sharing self-efficacy among healthcare professionals".
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Apr 29;13:158. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1916_23. eCollection 2024.
2
Facilitating and Inhibiting Factors of Clinical Knowledge Sharing among Medical Specialists in University Hospitals.大学医院医学专家临床知识共享的促进因素与抑制因素
Int J Prev Med. 2024 Jan 30;14:132. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_143_23. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge sharing in a health infomediary: role of self-concept, emotional empowerment, and self-esteem.健康信息中介中的知识共享:自我概念、情感赋权和自尊的作用。
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2018 Jan 4;7(3):181-194. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2017.1405875. eCollection 2018.
2
Barriers to knowledge sharing in Chinese healthcare referral services: an emergent theoretical model.中国医疗转诊服务中知识共享的障碍:一个新兴的理论模型。
Glob Health Action. 2016 Feb 15;9:29964. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.29964. eCollection 2016.
3
Factors influencing physicians' knowledge sharing on web medical forums.
影响医生在网络医学论坛上知识共享的因素。
Health Informatics J. 2016 Sep;22(3):594-607. doi: 10.1177/1460458215576229. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
4
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
5
Bothered by abstraction: the effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance.受抽象概念困扰:专业知识对知识转移及新手后续表现的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Dec;86(6):1232-43. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1232.