• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Assessing the clinical efficacy of reverse question mark scalp incision in decompressive hemicraniectomy: a trial sequential analysis.

作者信息

Romeiro Pedro Henrique Carvalho Leite, Silva Catarina Rodriguez, Oliveira Leonardo de Barros, Bertani Raphael

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University Center of Maceio, UNIMA, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.

Department of Medicine, University Center CESMAC, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Mar 7;47(1):104. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02352-w.

DOI:10.1007/s10143-024-02352-w
PMID:38451387
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Assessing the clinical efficacy of reverse question mark scalp incision in decompressive hemicraniectomy: a trial sequential analysis.评估反问号头皮切口在减压性颅骨切除术中的临床疗效：一项序贯试验分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Mar 7;47(1):104. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02352-w.
2
Letter to editor: Scalp incision technique for decompressive hemicraniectomy: Comparative systematic review and meta‑analysis of the reverse question mark versus alternative retroauricular and Kempe incision techniques of published cases.给编辑的信：去骨瓣减压术中的头皮切口技术：发表病例中反向问号与其他耳后和 Kempe 切口技术的比较系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Apr 11;47(1):148. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02394-0.
3
Scalp incision technique for decompressive hemicraniectomy: comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of the reverse question mark versus alternative retroauricular and Kempe incision techniques.去骨瓣减压术的头皮切口技术：反向问号与其他耳后和 Kempe 切口技术的对比系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Feb 14;47(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02307-1.
4
How I do it-the posterior question mark incision for decompressive hemicraniectomy.我是这样做的——减压性半颅骨切除术的后问号切口。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 May;163(5):1447-1450. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04812-4. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
5
An altered posterior question-mark incision is associated with a reduced infection rate of cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy.改良后的后问号切口与去骨瓣减压术后颅骨修补术感染率降低有关。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Apr 24;134(3):1262-1270. doi: 10.3171/2020.2.JNS193335. Print 2021 Mar 1.
6
Craniectomy size and decompression of the temporal base using the altered posterior question-mark incision for decompressive hemicraniectomy.采用改良后的后问号切口行减压性半颅骨切除术时的颅骨切除术大小和颞底减压。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 14;13(1):11419. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37689-7.
7
Decompressive craniectomy incisions: all roads lead to bone.减压性颅骨切除术切口：条条大路通骨头。
Br J Neurosurg. 2024 Apr 23:1-8. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2024.2344759.
8
The Retroauricular Incision as an Effective and Safe Alternative Incision for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy.耳后切口作为减压性颅骨切除术的一种有效且安全的替代切口
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021 May 13;20(6):549-558. doi: 10.1093/ons/opab021.
9
Commentary: The Retro-Auricular Incision as an Effective and Safe Alternative Incision for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy.评论：耳后切口作为减压性颅骨切除术有效且安全的替代切口
Oper Neurosurg. 2021 May 13;20(6):E398. doi: 10.1093/ons/opab054.
10
The posterior question mark incision for decompressive hemicraniectomy.用于减压性去骨瓣开颅术的后问号切口。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Jun;164(6):1659-1660. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05226-6. Epub 2022 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Scalp incision technique for decompressive hemicraniectomy: comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of the reverse question mark versus alternative retroauricular and Kempe incision techniques.去骨瓣减压术的头皮切口技术：反向问号与其他耳后和 Kempe 切口技术的对比系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Feb 14;47(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02307-1.
2
Trial sequential analysis: novel approach for meta-analysis.序贯试验分析：荟萃分析的新方法。
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021 Apr;16(2):138-150. doi: 10.17085/apm.21038. Epub 2021 Apr 30.