ASTRE, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, CIRAD, Campus international de Baillarguet, 34980 Montferrier sur Lez, France.
Département Santé animale, INRAE, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Animal. 2024 Mar;18(3):101100. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101100. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
The need to integrate more clearly societal expectations on livestock farming has led the authors of this article to consider that livestock farming systems must be redesigned to position health and welfare at the heart of their objectives. This article proposes a vision of the advances in knowledge required at different scales to contribute to this transformation. After defining health and welfare of animals, the article emphasises the need to consider health in a broader perspective, to deepen the question of positive emotional experiences regarding welfare, and raises the question of how to assess these two elements on farms. The positive interactions between health and welfare are presented. Some possible tensions between them are also discussed, in particular when improving welfare by providing a more stimulating and richer environment such as access to outdoor increases the risk of infectious diseases. Jointly improving health and welfare of animals poses a number of questions at various scales, from the animal level to the production chain. At the animal level, the authors highlight the need to explore: the long-term links between better welfare and physiological balance, the role of microbiota, the psycho-neuro-endocrine mechanisms linking positive mental state and health, and the trade-off between the physiological functions of production, reproduction and immunity. At the farm level, in addition to studying the relationships at the group level between welfare, health and production, the paper supports the idea of co-constructing innovative systems with livestock farmers, as well as analysing the cost, acceptability and impact of improved systems on their working conditions and well-being. At the production chain or territory levels, various questions are raised. These include studying the best strategies to improve animal health and welfare while preserving economic viability, the labelling of products and the consumers' willingness to pay, the consequences of heterogeneity in animal traits on the processing of animal products, and the spatial distribution of livestock farming and the organisation of the production and value chain. At the level of the citizen and consumer, one of the challenges is to better inter-relate sanitary and health perspectives on the one hand, and welfare concerns on the other hand. There is also a need to improve citizens' knowledge on livestock farming, and to develop more intense and constructive exchanges between livestock farmers, the livestock industry and citizens. These difficult issues plead for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research involving various scientific disciplines and the different stakeholders, including public policy makers through participatory research.
为了更明确地将社会对畜牧业的期望纳入考量,本文作者认为,有必要对畜牧业系统进行重新设计,将健康和福利置于其目标核心。本文提出了一个不同尺度上知识进步的愿景,以推动这一转变。在定义动物的健康和福利之后,文章强调需要从更广泛的角度考虑健康,深入研究福利方面的积极情感体验问题,并提出如何在农场层面评估这两个要素。本文还介绍了健康和福利之间的积极相互作用。同时,还讨论了它们之间可能存在的一些紧张关系,特别是当通过提供更刺激和丰富的环境(例如,户外放牧增加了传染病的风险)来提高福利时。共同提高动物的健康和福利在不同尺度上提出了许多问题,从动物层面到生产链。在动物层面上,作者强调需要探索:更好的福利和生理平衡之间的长期联系、微生物组的作用、将积极精神状态与健康联系起来的心理神经内分泌机制,以及生产、繁殖和免疫生理功能之间的权衡。在农场层面,除了研究福利、健康和生产之间在群体层面的关系外,本文还支持与畜牧业者共同构建创新系统的想法,以及分析改进系统对其工作条件和福利的成本、可接受性和影响。在生产链或地区层面,提出了各种问题。这些问题包括研究在保持经济可行性的同时提高动物健康和福利的最佳策略、产品标签以及消费者的支付意愿、动物特性的异质性对动物产品加工的影响,以及畜牧业的空间分布和生产价值链的组织。在公民和消费者层面,其中一个挑战是更好地将卫生和健康方面与福利方面联系起来。还需要提高公民对畜牧业的认识,并在畜牧业者、畜牧业和公民之间发展更激烈和建设性的交流。这些困难的问题需要涉及多个科学学科和不同利益相关者的跨学科和跨学科研究,包括通过参与式研究的公共政策制定者。