1UMR AGIR,Université de Toulouse,INRA,31326 Castanet-Tolosan,France.
2Université Clermont Auvergne,INRA,VetAgro Sup,UMR Herbivores,63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle,France.
Animal. 2019 Aug;13(8):1760-1772. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119000351. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
Livestock farming is criticized for negatively impacting the environment, concerns about animal welfare and the impact of excessive meat consumption on human health. However, livestock farming provides other underappreciated and poorly communicated benefits to society in terms of employment, product quality, cultural landscapes and carbon storage by grasslands. Few attempts have been made so far to simultaneously consider the services and impacts provided by livestock production. Here, we propose an integrated graphical tool, called the 'barn' to explicitly summarize the synergies and trade-offs between services and impacts provided by livestock farming. It illustrates livestock farming interacting with its physical, economic and social environment along five interfaces: (i) Markets, (ii) Work and employment, (iii) Inputs, (iv) Environment and climate, (v) Social and cultural factors. This graphical tool was then applied by comparing two contrasting livestock production areas (high livestock density v. grassland-based), and the dominant v. a niche system within a crop-livestock area. We showed the barn could be used for cross-comparisons of services and impacts across livestock production areas, and for multi-level analysis of services and impacts of livestock farming within a given area. The barn graphically summarizes the ecological and socio-economic aspects of livestock farming by explicitly representing multiple services and impacts of different systems in a simple yet informative way. Information for the five interfaces relies on available quantitative assessments from the literature or data sets, and on expert-knowledge for more qualitative factors, such as social and cultural ones. The 'barn' can also inform local stakeholders or policy-makers about potential opportunities and threats to the future of livestock farming in specific production areas. It has already been used as a pedagogical tool for teaching the diversity of services and impacts of livestock systems across Europe and is currently developed as a serious game for encouraging knowledge exchange and sharing different viewpoints between stakeholders.
畜牧业因其对环境的负面影响、动物福利问题以及过度肉类消费对人类健康的影响而备受批评。然而,畜牧业在就业、产品质量、文化景观和草原碳储存等方面为社会提供了其他未被充分认识和沟通不足的好处。迄今为止,很少有人试图同时考虑畜牧业生产提供的服务和影响。在这里,我们提出了一种综合图形工具,称为“谷仓”,以明确总结畜牧业提供的服务和影响之间的协同作用和权衡。它说明了畜牧业与其物理、经济和社会环境在五个接口之间的相互作用:(i)市场,(ii)工作和就业,(iii)投入,(iv)环境和气候,(v)社会和文化因素。然后,我们通过比较两个截然不同的畜牧业生产地区(高畜牧业密度与草原为基础)和一个作物-畜牧业地区内的主导系统与利基系统来应用该图形工具。我们表明,谷仓可以用于跨畜牧业生产地区比较服务和影响,也可以用于在给定地区内对畜牧业的服务和影响进行多层次分析。谷仓通过以简单而富有信息量的方式明确表示不同系统的多种服务和影响,图形化地总结了畜牧业的生态和社会经济方面。五个接口的信息依赖于文献或数据集提供的可用定量评估,以及更定性因素(如社会和文化因素)的专家知识。“谷仓”还可以为特定生产地区的未来畜牧业提供有关潜在机会和威胁的信息,让当地利益相关者或决策者了解畜牧业的未来。它已经被用作跨欧洲畜牧业系统的多样性的教学工具,目前正在开发为一种严肃的游戏,以鼓励知识交流和利益相关者之间分享不同观点。