• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

魁北克分娩中心的护理与服务伙伴关系:是神话还是现实?

Care and services partnership in Quebec birthing centres: myth or reality?

机构信息

Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.

Research Centre, University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 7;24(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06362-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06362-w
PMID:38454331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10918890/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Working with women to best meet their needs has always been central to midwifery in Quebec, Canada. The creation of birthing centres at the end of the 1990s consolidated this desire to prioritize women's involvement in perinatal care and was intended to encourage the establishment of a care and services partnership between care providers and users. The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the perceptions of clients, midwives and birth assistants of the way in which women are involved in partnership working in Quebec birthing centres.

METHODS

A single qualitative case and pilot study was conducted with midwives (n = 5), birth assistants (n = 4), a manager (n = 1), clients (n = 5) and members of the users' committee (n = 2) at a birthing centre in Quebec, Canada in July and August 2023. The partnership was evaluated using the dimensions of a validated CADICEE questionnaire.

RESULTS

The women and professionals stressed that the relationship was established in a climate of trust. The caregivers also attached importance to autonomy, information sharing and decision-making, adaptation to context, empathy and recognition of the couple's expertise. The women confirmed that they establish a relationship of trust with the professionals when the latter show empathy and that they adapt the follow-up to their knowledge and life context. Key factors in establishing this kind of care relationship are the time given, a de-medicalized environment, the comprehensive care received, and professionals who are well-informed about the partnership. In addition, the birthing centre has a users' committee that can put forward ideas but has no decision-making powers.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the women and the professionals at the birthing centre appear to be working in partnership. However, at the organizational level, the women are not involved in decision-making. A study of all birthing centres in Quebec would provide a more comprehensive picture of the situation.

摘要

背景

在加拿大魁北克,以满足女性需求为中心一直是助产士工作的核心。20 世纪 90 年代末,生育中心的创建巩固了将女性纳入围产期护理的愿望,并旨在鼓励护理提供者和使用者之间建立护理和服务伙伴关系。本试点研究的目的是评估客户、助产士和分娩助手对魁北克生育中心中女性参与伙伴关系工作的方式的看法。

方法

2023 年 7 月至 8 月,在加拿大魁北克的一家生育中心对 5 名助产士、4 名分娩助手、1 名经理、5 名客户和 2 名用户委员会成员进行了单案例定性和试点研究。使用经过验证的 CADICEE 问卷的维度评估伙伴关系。

结果

女性和专业人员强调在信任的氛围中建立关系。护理人员还重视自主权、信息共享和决策、适应环境、同理心和对夫妇专业知识的认可。女性证实,当护理人员表现出同理心时,她们会与专业人员建立信任关系,并且会根据自己的知识和生活背景调整随访。建立这种护理关系的关键因素是给予的时间、非医疗化的环境、接受的全面护理以及对伙伴关系有充分了解的专业人员。此外,生育中心有一个用户委员会,可以提出想法,但没有决策权。

结论

生育中心的女性和专业人员似乎都在合作。然而,在组织层面上,女性不参与决策。对魁北克所有生育中心的研究将提供更全面的情况图景。

相似文献

1
Care and services partnership in Quebec birthing centres: myth or reality?魁北克分娩中心的护理与服务伙伴关系:是神话还是现实?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 7;24(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06362-w.
2
Understanding factors affecting collaboration between midwives and other health care professionals in a birth center and its affiliated Quebec hospital: a case study.了解影响分娩中心及其附属魁北克医院助产士与其他医护人员之间合作的因素:一项案例研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jun 26;17(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1381-x.
3
Women's views on partnership working with midwives during pregnancy and childbirth.女性对孕期及分娩期间与助产士合作关系的看法。
Midwifery. 2016 Jan;32:21-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
4
Which low- and middle-income countries have midwife-led birthing centres and what are the main characteristics of these centres? A scoping review and scoping survey.哪些中低收入国家设有导乐助产士主导的分娩中心,这些中心的主要特征是什么?一项范围界定综述和范围界定调查。
Midwifery. 2023 Aug;123:103717. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103717. Epub 2023 May 8.
5
Evaluation of the midwifery pilot projects in Quebec: an overview. L'Equipe d'Evaluation des Projets-Pilotes Sages-Femmes.魁北克助产士试点项目评估:概述。助产士试点项目评估团队。
Can J Public Health. 2000 Jan-Feb;91(1):I1-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03404259.
6
Working in caseload midwifery care: the experience of midwives working in a birth centre in North Queensland.在病例助产护理中工作:在北昆士兰的一个生育中心工作的助产士的经验。
Women Birth. 2014 Mar;27(1):31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Oct 20.
7
Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.独立助产士在分娩中心和家中分娩的结局:日本的一项回顾性队列研究。
Midwifery. 2013 Aug;29(8):965-72. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
8
Midwife-led birthing centres in four countries: a case study.四国导乐分娩中心:案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 17;23(1):1105. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10125-2.
9
Defining and describing birth centres in the Netherlands - a component study of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.定义和描述荷兰的分娩中心——荷兰分娩中心研究的一项子研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 3;17(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1375-8.
10
Choosing an out-of-hospital birth centre: Exploring women's decision-making experiences.选择院外分娩中心:探究女性的决策经历。
Midwifery. 2016 Aug;39:12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 Apr 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Accompanying patients in clinical oncology teams: Reported activities and perceived effects.临床肿瘤团队中陪伴患者:报告的活动和感知效果。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):847-857. doi: 10.1111/hex.13710. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
2
'Forgotten as first line providers': The experiences of midwives during the COVID-19 pandemic in British Columbia, Canada.被遗忘的一线服务提供者:加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的助产士在 COVID-19 大流行期间的经历。
Midwifery. 2022 Oct;113:103437. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103437. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
3
Assessing and promoting partnership between patients and health-care professionals: Co-construction of the CADICEE tool for patients and their relatives.评估和促进患者与医疗保健专业人员之间的合作关系:为患者及其亲属共同构建 CADICEE 工具。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1230-1241. doi: 10.1111/hex.13253. Epub 2021 May 5.
4
The patient advisor, an organizational resource as a lever for an enhanced oncology patient experience (PAROLE-onco): a longitudinal multiple case study protocol.患者顾问:作为增强肿瘤患者体验的杠杆的组织资源(PAROLE-onco):一项纵向多案例研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 4;21(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06009-4.
5
Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131.定性数据分析的主题分析:AMEE 指南第 131 号。
Med Teach. 2020 Aug;42(8):846-854. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Epub 2020 May 1.
6
[Patient advisors for victims of traumatic amputation: a critical intervention].创伤性截肢受害者的患者顾问:一项关键干预措施
Rev Prat. 2015 Nov;65(9):1215-1218.
7
Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review.参与患者以提高医疗质量:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 26;13(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z.
8
Understanding factors affecting collaboration between midwives and other health care professionals in a birth center and its affiliated Quebec hospital: a case study.了解影响分娩中心及其附属魁北克医院助产士与其他医护人员之间合作的因素:一项案例研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jun 26;17(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1381-x.
9
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Sante Publique. 2015 Mar-Apr;1 Suppl:41-50.
10
Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care.助产士和优质护理:新的母婴护理循证框架的研究结果。
Lancet. 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):1129-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3. Epub 2014 Jun 22.