Dankowski Theresa, Kastner Lydia, Suenkel Ulrike, von Thaler Anna-Katharina, Mychajliw Christian, Krawczak Michael, Maetzler Walter, Berg Daniela, Brockmann Kathrin, Thiel Ansgar, Eschweiler Gerhard W, Heinzel Sebastian
Department of Neurology, Kiel University, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Institute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Front Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 13;3:1093780. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2023.1093780. eCollection 2023.
Older individuals are most at risk of severe COVID-19 and particularly require protection causing (self)restriction of psychosocial interaction in daily living. So far, the impact of psychosocial withdrawal on mental health seems less pronounced in community-dwelling older individuals compared to younger individuals. However, dynamics and adverse long-term effects of the pandemic, such as increases in depression, are still mostly unclear, especially for vulnerable subgroups.
Pre-pandemic and 3-, 8-, 14-, 20-month peri-pandemic data were analyzed in 877 older participants (age at 3-month peri-pandemic: mean ± SD: 72.3 ± 6.3, range: 58-91 years) of the observational prospective TREND study in Germany. Severity of depression (Beck's Depression Inventory-II scores) and key factors of (mental) health were investigated for cross-sectional associations using path modeling. Risk groups defined by resilience, loneliness, history of depression, stress, health status and fear of COVID-19 were investigated for differences in depression between timepoints.
The early pandemic (3-month) severity of depression was most strongly associated with history of depression, stress and resilience. Overall increases in clinically relevant depression (mild-severe) from pre- to 3-month peri-pandemic were small (% with depression at pre-/3-month peri-pandemic: 8.3%/11.5%). Changes were most pronounced in risk groups with low resilience (27.2%/41.8%), loneliness (19.0%/28.9%), fear of COVID-19 (17.6%/31.4%), high stress (24.4%/34.2%), a history of depression (27.7%/36.9%), and low health status (21.8%/31.4%). Changes in depression were largely observed from pre- to 3-month and were sustained to the 20-month peri-pandemic timepoint, overall and in stratified risk groups defined by single and cumulative risk factors. Changes between timepoints were heterogenous as indicated by alluvial diagrams.
Only specific risk groups of older individuals showed a large increase in depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Since these increases occurred early in the pandemic and were sustained over 20 months, these vulnerable risk groups need to be prioritized for counselling and risk mitigation of depression.
老年人感染新冠重症的风险最高,尤其需要保护,这导致他们在日常生活中(自我)限制心理社会互动。到目前为止,与年轻人相比,心理社会退缩对社区居住老年人心理健康的影响似乎不那么明显。然而,大流行的动态变化和长期不良影响,如抑郁症发病率上升,目前仍大多不清楚,尤其是对弱势群体而言。
对德国前瞻性观察性TREND研究中的877名老年参与者(疫情爆发后3个月时的年龄:平均±标准差:72.3±6.3岁;范围:58 - 91岁)的疫情前以及疫情爆发后3个月、8个月、14个月、20个月的数据进行了分析。使用路径模型研究抑郁严重程度(贝克抑郁量表-II得分)与(心理)健康的关键因素之间的横断面关联。研究由恢复力、孤独感、抑郁病史、压力、健康状况和对新冠的恐惧所定义的风险组在各时间点之间抑郁情况的差异。
疫情早期(3个月时)的抑郁严重程度与抑郁病史、压力和恢复力的关联最为密切。从疫情前到疫情爆发后3个月,临床相关抑郁(轻度 - 重度)的总体增幅较小(疫情前/疫情爆发后3个月患抑郁症的比例:8.3%/11.5%)。在恢复力低(27.2%/41.8%)、孤独(19.0%/28.9%)、对新冠恐惧(17.6%/31.4%)、压力大(24.4%/34.2%)、有抑郁病史(27.7%/36.9%)以及健康状况差(21.8%/31.4%)的风险组中,变化最为明显。抑郁情况的变化主要出现在疫情前到3个月期间,并持续到疫情爆发后20个月这个时间点,总体情况以及在由单一和累积风险因素定义的分层风险组中均是如此。冲积图显示各时间点之间的变化是异质性的。
在新冠疫情期间,只有特定的老年风险群体的抑郁情况大幅增加。由于这些增加在疫情早期就已出现并持续了20个月,这些脆弱的风险群体需要被优先考虑进行抑郁咨询和风险缓解。