Suppr超能文献

新冠后状态患者与非新冠后状态患者在健康相关生活质量和心理健康方面的横断面及纵向比较。

Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparison of health-related quality of life and mental well-being between persons with and without post COVID-19 condition.

作者信息

Scott Emily Stella, Lubetkin Erica I, Janssen Mathieu F, Yfantopolous John, Bonsel Gouke J, Haagsma Juanita A

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Community Health and Social Medicine, CUNY School of Medicine, New York City, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Epidemiol. 2023 May 22;3:1144162. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2023.1144162. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Still little is known about the impact of post COVID-19 condition (PC) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and mental well-being. We compared participants with PC with three groups: an acute COVID-19 infection (AC) only, at least one chronic condition (CC) but no COVID-19, or no condition at all, healthy (PH). Between these disease groups, we also estimated and compared HRQOL and mental well-being change over time.

METHODS

Participants from six countries (Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom and United States) completed two web-based questionnaires (T1 = April-May 2020 and T2 = April-June 2022). Primary outcomes were HRQOL, measured by EQ-5D-5L and EQ VAS, and mental well-being (measured by World Health Organisation-Five (WHO-5) Well-Being Index, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 and General Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7). All analyses were stratified by the disease groups.

RESULTS

In total, 4,999 participants filled out both surveys: 240 were in PC, 107 in AC, 1798 in CC and 2,854 in PH. At T2, the mean EQ-5D-5L index values for the PC, AC, CC and PH groups were 0.70, 0.73, 0.75 and 0.92 ( < .001), respectively. Mean EQ VAS scores were 66, 65, 68 and 81 ( < .001), respectively. Poor mental well-being, depression and anxiety mean values were highest in the PC group (47.7; 9.1; 7.4), followed by the AC group (51.1; 7.7; 5.7), CC group (56.1; 5.2; 4.2) and the PH group (65.6; 2.8; 2.5), respectively ( < .001 between groups). Over time, HRQOL deteriorated in all groups, apart from the PH group. We observed the largest deterioration in the CC (EQ-5D-5L index: Δ0.03,  < .001) and AC group (EQ VAS: Δ6.3,  < .001). For the mental well-being outcomes, deterioration for WHO-5 and PHQ-9 were largest in the AC group (Δ4.8,  = .016; Δ-1.3,  = .012). Rates for GAD-7 improved for the PH and CC groups (PH: Δ1.27, CC: Δ0.56,  < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the cross-sectional analysis, participants with PC had the worst HRQOL and mental well-being compared to the other groups. In terms of change since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, HRQOL and mental well-being deterioration was highest among AC participants and had a lower impact among PC participants, most likely due to pre-existing chronic disease.

摘要

背景

关于新冠后状况(PC)对健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)和心理健康的影响,目前仍知之甚少。我们将患有PC的参与者与三组人群进行了比较:仅患有急性新冠感染(AC)、至少患有一种慢性病(CC)但未感染新冠,或完全没有疾病、健康的人群(PH)。在这些疾病组之间,我们还估计并比较了HRQOL和心理健康随时间的变化。

方法

来自六个国家(希腊、意大利、荷兰、瑞典、英国和美国)的参与者完成了两份基于网络的问卷(T1 = 2020年4月至5月,T2 = 2022年4月至6月)。主要结局指标为通过EQ - 5D - 5L和EQ VAS测量的HRQOL以及心理健康(通过世界卫生组织五福(WHO - 5)幸福指数、患者健康问卷(PHQ) - 9和广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD) - 7进行测量)。所有分析均按疾病组进行分层。

结果

共有4999名参与者完成了两份调查问卷:240人患有PC,107人患有AC,1798人患有CC,2854人健康(PH)。在T2时,PC组、AC组、CC组和PH组的平均EQ - 5D - 5L指数值分别为0.70、0.73、0.75和0.92(P <.001)。平均EQ VAS得分分别为66、65、68和81(P <.001)。心理健康状况不佳、抑郁和焦虑的平均值在PC组中最高(47.7;9.1;7.4),其次是AC组(51.1;7.7;5.7)、CC组(56.1;5.2;4.2)和PH组(65.6;2.8;2.5),组间差异均有统计学意义(P <.001)。随着时间的推移,除PH组外,所有组的HRQOL均有所恶化。我们观察到CC组(EQ - 5D - 5L指数:Δ0.03,P <.001)和AC组(EQ VAS:Δ6.3,P <.001)的恶化最为明显。对于心理健康结局指标,WHO - 5和PHQ - 9在AC组中的恶化最为显著(Δ4.8,P = 0.016;Δ - 1.3,P = 0.012)。PH组和CC组的GAD - 7评分有所改善(PH组:Δ1.27,CC组:Δ0.56,P <.001)。

结论

在横断面分析中,与其他组相比,患有PC的参与者的HRQOL和心理健康状况最差。就自新冠疫情开始以来的变化而言,AC参与者的HRQOL和心理健康恶化程度最高,而PC参与者受到的影响较小,这很可能是由于其先前存在的慢性病所致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fa/10910898/9cb023c67964/fepid-03-1144162-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验