STIMULUS Research Group (reSearch and TeachIng neuroModULation Uz bruSsel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 20;10:991572. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.991572. eCollection 2022.
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic exerted a tremendous pressure on the healthcare system, people's social life, mental health and financial status with profound implications for the general population. The exact impact of the pandemic on the overall physical, mental and social wellbeing of COVID-19 infection survivors on the long term has not yet been explored in a thorough way. Based on the reporting of persistent pain, fatigue and dyspnea symptoms by these survivors, it is our hypothesis that their quality of life will be extremely impacted, as is observed in patients with chronic pain. Therefore, the first aim of this study was to perform an in-depth evaluation of the quality of life of post-COVID-19 infected persons. The second aim was to compare the quality of life of these persons with a normative population and with patients with chronic pain. Health-related quality of life, as a measure for a person's overall physical, mental, and social wellbeing, was measured with the 3-level EQ5D in 547 post-COVID-19 infected persons. These data were compared to reference data from normal population records for Belgium and to data from patients with chronic pain after spinal surgery with two-way analyses of variance. In total, 89.58% of the post-COVID-19 infected persons reported pain/discomfort and 82.45% indicated limitations when performing usual activities, when evaluated 287 days (SD: 150) after the infection. Self-care was preserved in most post-COVID-19 persons, whereby only 13.16% indicated problems. The mean EQ5D-3L index score was 0.57 (SD: 0.23) and EQ5D VAS mean score was 56.6 (SD: 18.2). The mean index score for the normative population was significantly higher than for COVID-19 infected persons [mean difference of 0.31 (95% from 0.29 to 0.33), < 0.01] while the mean score of chronic pain patients was significantly lower than the score of COVID-19 infected persons [mean difference of -0.31 (95% from -0.29 to -0.33), < 0.01]. Compared to age-and sex adjusted reference data, health-related quality of life of persons with long COVID is severely impacted. In relation to patients with chronic pain after spinal surgery, the quality of life of post-COVID-19 infected persons seemed to be better.
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier: NCT04912778.
深入评估新冠感染后人群的生活质量,并与普通人群和慢性疼痛患者进行比较。
采用 EQ5D-3L 量表评估 547 例新冠感染后人群的健康相关生活质量,记录疼痛/不适和日常活动受限的比例,并与比利时普通人群和脊柱手术后慢性疼痛患者的数据进行比较。
89.58%的新冠感染后人群报告有疼痛/不适,82.45%的人群在感染后 287 天(SD:150)时报告日常活动受限。自我护理在大多数新冠感染后人群中得到保留,仅有 13.16%的人群存在问题。EQ5D-3L 指数平均得分为 0.57(SD:0.23),EQ5D VAS 平均得分为 56.6(SD:18.2)。普通人群的平均指数得分显著高于新冠感染后人群[平均差值为 0.31(95%置信区间为 0.29 至 0.33),<0.01],而慢性疼痛患者的平均得分显著低于新冠感染后人群[平均差值为-0.31(95%置信区间为-0.29 至-0.33),<0.01]。与年龄和性别调整后的参考数据相比,长新冠患者的健康相关生活质量受到严重影响。与脊柱手术后慢性疼痛患者相比,新冠感染后人群的生活质量似乎更好。
新冠感染后人群的健康相关生活质量明显下降,与慢性疼痛患者相比,他们的生活质量更好。