• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 ResNet 预测放疗中个体化 QA 中的误差幅度。

Predicting the error magnitude in patient-specific QA during radiotherapy based on ResNet.

机构信息

Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-Beam Application (MOE), Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Xray Sci Technol. 2024;32(3):797-807. doi: 10.3233/XST-230251.

DOI:10.3233/XST-230251
PMID:38457139
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The error magnitude is closely related to patient-specific dosimetry and plays an important role in evaluating the delivery of the radiotherapy plan in QA. No previous study has investigated the feasibility of deep learning to predict error magnitude.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to predict the error magnitude of different delivery error types in radiotherapy based on ResNet.

METHODS

A total of 34 chest cancer plans (172 fields) of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) from Eclipse were selected, of which 30 plans (151 fields) were used for model training and validation, and 4 plans including 21 fields were used for external testing. The collimator misalignment (COLL), monitor unit variation (MU), random multi-leaf collimator shift (MLCR), and systematic MLC shift (MLCS) were introduced. These dose distributions of portal dose predictions for the original plans were defined as the reference dose distribution (RDD), while those for the error-introduced plans were defined as the error-introduced dose distribution (EDD). Different inputs were used in the ResNet for predicting the error magnitude.

RESULTS

In the test set, the accuracy of error type prediction based on the dose difference, gamma distribution, and RDD + EDD was 98.36%, 98.91%, and 100%, respectively; the root mean squared error (RMSE) was 1.45-1.54, 0.58-0.90, 0.32-0.36, and 0.15-0.24; the mean absolute error (MAE) was 1.06-1.18, 0.32-0.78, 0.25-0.27, and 0.11-0.18, respectively, for COLL, MU, MLCR and MLCS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, error magnitude prediction models with dose difference, gamma distribution, and RDD + EDD are established based on ResNet. The accurate prediction of the error magnitude under different error types can provide reference for error analysis in patient-specific QA.

摘要

背景

误差幅度与患者特定剂量密切相关,在 QA 中评估放疗计划的实施中起着重要作用。以前没有研究调查过深度学习预测误差幅度的可行性。

目的

本研究旨在基于 ResNet 预测放疗中不同传输误差类型的误差幅度。

方法

从 Eclipse 中选择了 34 例胸部癌症调强放疗(IMRT)计划(172 个射野),其中 30 个计划(151 个射野)用于模型训练和验证,4 个计划(21 个射野)用于外部测试。引入准直器失准(COLL)、MU 变化、随机多叶准直器移位(MLCR)和系统 MLC 移位(MLCS)。这些原始计划的射野剂量预测的剂量分布被定义为参考剂量分布(RDD),而引入误差的计划的剂量分布则被定义为引入误差的剂量分布(EDD)。ResNet 中使用了不同的输入来预测误差幅度。

结果

在测试集中,基于剂量差、伽马分布和 RDD+EDD 的误差类型预测准确率分别为 98.36%、98.91%和 100%;均方根误差(RMSE)分别为 1.45-1.54、0.58-0.90、0.32-0.36 和 0.15-0.24;平均绝对误差(MAE)分别为 1.06-1.18、0.32-0.78、0.25-0.27 和 0.11-0.18,用于 COLL、MU、MLCR 和 MLCS。

结论

在这项研究中,基于 ResNet 建立了基于剂量差、伽马分布和 RDD+EDD 的误差幅度预测模型。不同误差类型下误差幅度的准确预测可为患者特定 QA 中的误差分析提供参考。

相似文献

1
Predicting the error magnitude in patient-specific QA during radiotherapy based on ResNet.基于 ResNet 预测放疗中个体化 QA 中的误差幅度。
J Xray Sci Technol. 2024;32(3):797-807. doi: 10.3233/XST-230251.
2
Image-based features in machine learning to identify delivery errors and predict error magnitude for patient-specific IMRT quality assurance.基于图像的机器学习特征,用于识别交付错误,并预测特定于患者的调强放疗质量保证的错误幅度。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2023 May;199(5):498-510. doi: 10.1007/s00066-023-02076-8. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
3
A feasibility study to predict 3D dose delivery accuracy for IMRT using DenseNet with log files.基于日志文件使用 DenseNet 预测 IMRT 三维剂量投递精度的可行性研究
J Xray Sci Technol. 2024;32(4):1199-1208. doi: 10.3233/XST-230412.
4
Non-measured and DVH-based patient-specific QA framework for lung SBRT VMAT with machine learning integration.基于非测量和剂量体积直方图(DVH)的肺癌立体定向体部放疗容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)患者特异性质量保证框架与机器学习集成
Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17975. doi: 10.1002/mp.17975.
5
Evaluation of a Monte Carlo based EPID system for patient-specific IMRT and VMAT quality assurance.基于蒙特卡洛的用于患者特异性调强放疗和容积调强弧形放疗质量保证的电子射野影像装置系统评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Jul;26(7):e70178. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70178.
6
Developing reference plans for evaluating global clinical trials credentialing and PSQA systems.制定用于评估全球临床试验认证和药物警戒质量保证(PSQA)系统的参考计划。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Jul;26(7):e70113. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70113. Epub 2025 May 29.
7
Evaluation of the efficacy of automated machine learning enhanced planning system and a comparative analysis with manual planning system.自动化机器学习增强型计划系统的疗效评估及与手动计划系统的对比分析。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2025 Apr 1;21(3):593-601. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1373_24. Epub 2025 Jul 5.
8
Neural network dose prediction for cervical brachytherapy: Overcoming data scarcity for applicator-specific models.神经网络在宫颈癌近距离治疗中的剂量预测:克服施源器特异性模型的数据匮乏问题。
Med Phys. 2024 Jul;51(7):4591-4606. doi: 10.1002/mp.17230. Epub 2024 May 30.
9
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
10
A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Dose Prediction Models for Cervical Cancer Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.深度学习剂量预测模型在宫颈癌容积旋转调强放疗中的对比研究。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15330338241242654. doi: 10.1177/15330338241242654.