Suppr超能文献

远程视网膜成像结果与患者报告的糖尿病视网膜病变状况和随访眼科护理间隔之间的差异:一项为期 10 年的前瞻性研究。

Disparities Between Teleretinal Imaging Findings and Patient-Reported Diabetic Retinopathy Status and Follow-up Eye Care Interval: A 10-Year Prospective Study.

机构信息

Beetham Eye Institute, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA.

Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2024 Jun 1;47(6):970-977. doi: 10.2337/dc23-2282.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess self-reported awareness of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and concordance of eye examination follow-up compared with findings from concurrent retinal images.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational 10-year study of 26,876 consecutive patients with diabetes who underwent retinal imaging during an endocrinology visit. Awareness and concordance were evaluated using questionnaires and retinal imaging.

RESULTS

Awareness information and gradable images were available in 25,360 patients (94.3%). Severity of DR by imaging was as follows: no DR (n = 14,317; 56.5%), mild DR (n = 6,805; 26.8%), or vision-threatening DR (vtDR; n = 4,238; 16.7%). In the no, mild, and vtDR groups, 96.7%, 88.5%, and 54.9% of patients, respectively, reported being unaware of any prior DR. When DR was present, reporting no prior DR was associated with shorter diabetes duration, milder DR, last eye examination >1 year before, no dilation, no scheduled appointment, and less specialized provider (all P < 0.001). Among patients with vtDR, 41.2%, 58.1%, and 64.2% did not report being aware of any DR and follow-up was concordant with current DR severity in 66.7%, 41.3%, and 25.4% (P < 0.001) of patients when prior examination was performed by a retinal specialist, nonretinal ophthalmologist, or optometrist (P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial discrepancies exist between DR presence, patient awareness, and concordance of follow-up across all DR severity levels. These discrepancies are present across all eye care provider types, with the magnitude influenced by provider type. Therefore, patient self-report should not be relied upon to reflect DR status. Modification of medical care and education models may be necessary to enhance retention of ophthalmic knowledge in patients with diabetes and ensure accurate communication between all health care providers.

摘要

目的

评估自我报告的糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)意识与同时期视网膜图像检查结果的一致性。

研究设计与方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究,对 26876 例连续就诊的内分泌科糖尿病患者进行视网膜成像。使用问卷调查和视网膜成像评估意识和一致性。

结果

25360 例患者(94.3%)提供了意识信息和可分级图像。影像学诊断的 DR 严重程度如下:无 DR(n=14317;56.5%)、轻度 DR(n=6805;26.8%)或威胁视力的 DR(vtDR;n=4238;16.7%)。在无、轻度和 vtDR 组中,分别有 96.7%、88.5%和 54.9%的患者报告自己不知道任何先前的 DR。当存在 DR 时,报告没有先前的 DR 与较短的糖尿病病程、较轻的 DR、最后一次眼部检查在 1 年前、未散瞳、无预约以及较少的专科医生(均 P<0.001)相关。在有 vtDR 的患者中,41.2%、58.1%和 64.2%的患者未报告自己知道任何 DR,当上次检查由视网膜专家、非视网膜眼科医生或验光师进行时,66.7%、41.3%和 25.4%的患者(均 P<0.001)的随访与当前 DR 严重程度一致。

结论

在所有 DR 严重程度水平上,DR 存在、患者意识和随访一致性之间存在显著差异。这些差异存在于所有眼科保健提供者类型中,并且与提供者类型有关。因此,不应依赖患者的自我报告来反映 DR 状态。可能需要修改医疗保健和教育模式,以增强糖尿病患者的眼科知识保留,并确保所有医疗保健提供者之间的准确沟通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9885/11116909/ab0bdd8c3cf6/dc232282F0GA.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验