• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Willingness to Use Digital Health Screening and Tracking Tools for Public Health in Sexual Minority Populations in a National Probability Sample: Quantitative Intersectional Analysis.在全国概率样本中,性少数群体对公共卫生数字健康筛查和跟踪工具的使用意愿:定量交叉分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 8;26:e47448. doi: 10.2196/47448.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Racial and ethnic disparities in fecundability: a North American preconception cohort study.生育力方面的种族和族裔差异:一项北美孕前队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf067.
4
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
5
Do Women and Minority Orthopaedic Residents Report Experiencing Worse Well-being and More Mistreatment Than Their Peers?女性和少数族裔骨科住院医师报告的幸福感是否比同龄人更差,遭受的不当对待是否更多?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1325-1337. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003015. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
6
Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception.COVID-19 患者使用激素避孕的血栓栓塞风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 9;1(1):CD014908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014908.pub2.
7
Sexual identity differences in ideal cardiovascular health among cisgender adults in the All of Us Research Program.“我们所有人”研究项目中顺性别成年人理想心血管健康状况的性别认同差异。
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaf032.
8
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
9
Changes in Food Insecurity Among US Adults With Low Income During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间美国低收入成年人粮食不安全状况的变化
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2462277. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.62277.
10
Cannabis use, risk of cannabis use disorder, and anxiety and depression among bisexual patients: A comparative study of sex and sexual identity differences in a large health system.双性恋患者中的大麻使用、大麻使用障碍风险以及焦虑和抑郁:大型医疗系统中性别与性取向差异的比较研究
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2025 Jun 20;274:112762. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112762.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation and early outcomes of a telehealth visit model to deliver tecovirimat for mpox infection in New York City.纽约市用于提供替考韦瑞马特治疗猴痘感染的远程医疗就诊模式的实施及早期结果
J Telemed Telecare. 2025 May;31(4):534-539. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231194796. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
2
What's Next for Modernizing Gender, Sex, and Sexual Orientation Terminology in Digital Health Systems? Viewpoint on Research and Implementation Priorities.在数字健康系统中使性别、性和性取向术语现代化的下一步是什么?对研究和实施重点的观点。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 25;25:e46773. doi: 10.2196/46773.
3
Excess Death Rates for Republican and Democratic Registered Voters in Florida and Ohio During the COVID-19 Pandemic.共和党和民主党在佛罗里达州和俄亥俄州的选民在 COVID-19 大流行期间的超额死亡率。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Sep 1;183(9):916-923. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1154.
4
Online Health Information Seeking for Mpox in Endemic and Nonendemic Countries: Google Trends Study.流行国家和非流行国家关于猴痘的在线健康信息搜索:谷歌趋势研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 13;7:e42710. doi: 10.2196/42710.
5
Mpox in people with advanced HIV infection: a global case series.晚期HIV感染者中的猴痘:一项全球病例系列研究。
Lancet. 2023 Mar 18;401(10380):939-949. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00273-8. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
6
Developing and Evaluating a Measure of the Willingness to Use Pandemic-Related mHealth Tools Using National Probability Samples in the United States: Quantitative Psychometric Analyses and Tests of Sociodemographic Group Differences.利用美国全国概率样本开发和评估使用大流行相关移动健康工具的意愿量表:定量心理测量分析及社会人口学群体差异测试
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Feb 7;7:e38298. doi: 10.2196/38298.
7
Clinical Characteristics of Human Mpox (Monkeypox) in 2022: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.2022年人类猴痘的临床特征:系统评价与荟萃分析
Pathogens. 2023 Jan 15;12(1):146. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12010146.
8
Epidemiology of Human Mpox - Worldwide, 2018-2021.人类猴痘流行病学-全球,2018-2021 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023 Jan 20;72(3):68-72. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7203a4.
9
Rare exemplars and missed opportunities: Intersectionality within current sexual and gender diversity research and scholarship in psychology.罕见的范例和错失的机会:心理学中当前性与性别多样性研究与学术中的交叉性。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2023 Feb;49:101511. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101511. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
10
Desperately Seeking Intersectionality in Digital Health Disparity Research: Narrative Review to Inform a Richer Theorization of Multiple Disadvantage.迫切寻求数字健康差异研究中的交叉性:叙事综述以丰富多重劣势的理论化
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 7;24(12):e42358. doi: 10.2196/42358.

在全国概率样本中,性少数群体对公共卫生数字健康筛查和跟踪工具的使用意愿:定量交叉分析。

Willingness to Use Digital Health Screening and Tracking Tools for Public Health in Sexual Minority Populations in a National Probability Sample: Quantitative Intersectional Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 8;26:e47448. doi: 10.2196/47448.

DOI:10.2196/47448
PMID:38457790
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10960216/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about sexual minority adults' willingness to use digital health tools, such as pandemic-related tools for screening and tracking, outside of HIV prevention and intervention efforts for sexual minority men, specifically. Additionally, given the current cultural climate in the United States, heterosexual and sexual minority adults may differ in their willingness to use digital health tools, and there may be within-group differences among sexual minority adults.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared sexual minority and heterosexual adults' willingness to use COVID-19-related digital health tools for public health screening and tracking and tested whether sexual minority adults differed from each other by age group, gender, and race or ethnicity.

METHODS

We analyzed data from a cross-sectional, national probability survey (n=2047) implemented from May 30 to June 8, 2020, in the United States during the height of the public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Using latent-variable modeling, heterosexual and sexual minority adults were tested for differences in their willingness to use digital health tools for public health screening and tracking. Among sexual minority adults, specifically, associations with age, gender, and race or ethnicity were assessed.

RESULTS

On average, sexual minority adults showed greater willingness to use digital health tools for screening and tracking than heterosexual adults (latent factor mean difference 0.46, 95% CI 0.15-0.77). Among sexual minority adults, there were no differences by age group, gender, or race or ethnicity. However, African American (b=0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.62), Hispanic or Latino (b=0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.55), and other racial or ethnic minority (b=0.54, 95% CI 0.31-0.77) heterosexual adults showed greater willingness to use digital health tools for screening and tracking than White heterosexual adults.

CONCLUSIONS

In the United States, sexual minority adults were more willing to use digital health tools for screening and tracking than heterosexual adults. Sexual minority adults did not differ from each other by age, gender, or race or ethnicity in terms of their willingness to use these digital health tools, so no sexual orientation-based or intersectional disparities were identified. Furthermore, White heterosexual adults were less willing to use these tools than racial or ethnic minority heterosexual adults. Findings support the use of digital health tools with sexual minority adults, which could be important for other public health-related concerns (eg, the recent example of mpox). Additional studies are needed regarding the decision-making process of White heterosexual adults regarding the use of digital health tools to address public health crises, including pandemics or outbreaks that disproportionately affect minoritized populations.

摘要

背景

对于性少数群体成年人在 HIV 预防和干预工作之外,是否愿意使用数字健康工具,例如与大流行相关的筛查和追踪工具,知之甚少,特别是针对男同性恋者。此外,鉴于美国当前的文化氛围,异性恋和性少数群体成年人在使用数字健康工具的意愿上可能存在差异,而且性少数群体成年人之间也可能存在群体内差异。

目的

本研究比较了性少数群体和异性恋成年人使用与 COVID-19 相关的数字健康工具进行公共卫生筛查和追踪的意愿,并测试了性少数群体成年人是否因年龄组、性别和种族或民族而存在差异。

方法

我们分析了 2020 年 5 月 30 日至 6 月 8 日期间在美国进行的一项全国性概率调查(n=2047)的数据,该调查是在美国对 COVID-19 大流行做出公共卫生反应的高峰期实施的。使用潜在变量建模,对异性恋和性少数群体成年人在使用数字健康工具进行公共卫生筛查和追踪方面的意愿进行了测试。具体而言,还评估了性少数群体成年人中与年龄、性别和种族或民族的关联。

结果

平均而言,性少数群体成年人表示愿意比异性恋成年人更愿意使用数字健康工具进行筛查和追踪(潜在因素平均差异 0.46,95%置信区间 0.15-0.77)。在性少数群体成年人中,年龄组、性别或种族或民族之间没有差异。然而,非裔美国人(b=0.41,95%置信区间 0.19-0.62)、西班牙裔或拉丁裔(b=0.36,95%置信区间 0.18-0.55)和其他种族或少数民族(b=0.54,95%置信区间 0.31-0.77)的异性恋成年人表示愿意比白人异性恋成年人更愿意使用数字健康工具进行筛查和追踪。

结论

在美国,性少数群体成年人比异性恋成年人更愿意使用数字健康工具进行筛查和追踪。在使用这些数字健康工具的意愿方面,性少数群体成年人彼此之间没有差异,也没有因年龄、性别或种族或民族而存在差异,因此没有发现基于性取向或交叉性别的差异。此外,白人异性恋成年人比种族或民族少数异性恋成年人更不愿意使用这些工具。研究结果支持与性少数群体成年人一起使用数字健康工具,这对于其他与公共卫生相关的问题(例如,最近的猴痘示例)很重要。需要进一步研究白人异性恋成年人在使用数字健康工具来应对公共卫生危机(包括对少数群体人口造成不成比例影响的大流行或疫情)方面的决策过程。