Geraci Gaia, Smith Robert, Hansford Alison, Johnsson Eric, Critchley Helen, Khaled Lama Abi, King Laura, Cheng Michelle, Colin Tanja, Kang Tse Siang
Clarivate, 70 St. Mary Avenue, London, EC3A 8BE, UK.
Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), Hay's Galleria, 2nd Floor Goldings House, 2 Hay's Lane, London, SE1 2HB, UK.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 May;58(3):557-566. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00624-7. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
The Access Consortium New Active Substance Work-Sharing Initiative, or "Access" for simplicity, allows regulatory authorities (RAs) of the Access Consortium countries to jointly review applications for the registration of new active substances or for new indications. Using a survey developed by the pharmaceutical industry trade associations of the five Access Consortium countries-Australia, Canada, Singapore, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom (UK)-this study gathered insights into the perceptions and experiences of the Access pathway held by affiliates of pharmaceutical companies. Understanding industry perceptions of Access is important for the success of the initiative, as participation is voluntary. Findings indicate that affiliates who participated in Access had mostly positive experiences with this pathway; most affiliates were satisfied with their interactions with the Access RAs and appeared willing to continue to participate in the initiative. Affiliates' reasons for not having yet participated in Access included a lack of opportunity to do so and perceived barriers, such as the Access pathway being too complicated to manage. Recommendations to improve Access cover six key areas: ensure predictability, increase guidance and transparency, streamline processes, maintain flexibility, increase harmonization, and advance RA-industry cooperation. This study should facilitate informed discussions among relevant stakeholders on how to improve Access to maximize efficiencies, accelerate approvals, and improve patient access to innovative medicines.
准入联盟新活性物质工作共享倡议(简称为“准入”)允许准入联盟国家的监管机构(RA)联合审查新活性物质注册申请或新适应症申请。本研究使用了由准入联盟五个国家(澳大利亚、加拿大、新加坡、瑞士和英国)的制药行业贸易协会制定的一项调查,收集了制药公司附属机构对准入途径的看法和经验。由于参与是自愿的,了解行业对准入的看法对该倡议的成功至关重要。研究结果表明,参与准入的附属机构对该途径大多有积极的体验;大多数附属机构对与准入监管机构的互动感到满意,并似乎愿意继续参与该倡议。附属机构尚未参与准入的原因包括缺乏参与机会以及察觉到的障碍,例如准入途径过于复杂难以管理。改进准入的建议涵盖六个关键领域:确保可预测性、增加指导和透明度、简化流程、保持灵活性、加强协调以及推进监管机构与行业的合作。本研究应促进相关利益攸关方之间就是否改进准入以实现效率最大化、加快审批速度以及改善患者获得创新药物的机会进行明智的讨论。