• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制药行业对准入联盟新活性物质工作共享倡议(NASWSI)的看法与经验:调查结果与建议

Industry Perceptions and Experiences with the Access Consortium New Active Substance Work-Sharing Initiative (NASWSI): Survey Results and Recommendations.

作者信息

Geraci Gaia, Smith Robert, Hansford Alison, Johnsson Eric, Critchley Helen, Khaled Lama Abi, King Laura, Cheng Michelle, Colin Tanja, Kang Tse Siang

机构信息

Clarivate, 70 St. Mary Avenue, London, EC3A 8BE, UK.

Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), Hay's Galleria, 2nd Floor Goldings House, 2 Hay's Lane, London, SE1 2HB, UK.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 May;58(3):557-566. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00624-7. Epub 2024 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-024-00624-7
PMID:38459358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11043105/
Abstract

The Access Consortium New Active Substance Work-Sharing Initiative, or "Access" for simplicity, allows regulatory authorities (RAs) of the Access Consortium countries to jointly review applications for the registration of new active substances or for new indications. Using a survey developed by the pharmaceutical industry trade associations of the five Access Consortium countries-Australia, Canada, Singapore, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom (UK)-this study gathered insights into the perceptions and experiences of the Access pathway held by affiliates of pharmaceutical companies. Understanding industry perceptions of Access is important for the success of the initiative, as participation is voluntary. Findings indicate that affiliates who participated in Access had mostly positive experiences with this pathway; most affiliates were satisfied with their interactions with the Access RAs and appeared willing to continue to participate in the initiative. Affiliates' reasons for not having yet participated in Access included a lack of opportunity to do so and perceived barriers, such as the Access pathway being too complicated to manage. Recommendations to improve Access cover six key areas: ensure predictability, increase guidance and transparency, streamline processes, maintain flexibility, increase harmonization, and advance RA-industry cooperation. This study should facilitate informed discussions among relevant stakeholders on how to improve Access to maximize efficiencies, accelerate approvals, and improve patient access to innovative medicines.

摘要

准入联盟新活性物质工作共享倡议(简称为“准入”)允许准入联盟国家的监管机构(RA)联合审查新活性物质注册申请或新适应症申请。本研究使用了由准入联盟五个国家(澳大利亚、加拿大、新加坡、瑞士和英国)的制药行业贸易协会制定的一项调查,收集了制药公司附属机构对准入途径的看法和经验。由于参与是自愿的,了解行业对准入的看法对该倡议的成功至关重要。研究结果表明,参与准入的附属机构对该途径大多有积极的体验;大多数附属机构对与准入监管机构的互动感到满意,并似乎愿意继续参与该倡议。附属机构尚未参与准入的原因包括缺乏参与机会以及察觉到的障碍,例如准入途径过于复杂难以管理。改进准入的建议涵盖六个关键领域:确保可预测性、增加指导和透明度、简化流程、保持灵活性、加强协调以及推进监管机构与行业的合作。本研究应促进相关利益攸关方之间就是否改进准入以实现效率最大化、加快审批速度以及改善患者获得创新药物的机会进行明智的讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/11043105/5460cc69a9bc/43441_2024_624_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/11043105/fd02043aeb63/43441_2024_624_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/11043105/9dfbe4e472c5/43441_2024_624_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/11043105/bad6607ca9e2/43441_2024_624_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/11043105/5460cc69a9bc/43441_2024_624_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/11043105/fd02043aeb63/43441_2024_624_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/11043105/9dfbe4e472c5/43441_2024_624_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/11043105/bad6607ca9e2/43441_2024_624_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/11043105/5460cc69a9bc/43441_2024_624_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Industry Perceptions and Experiences with the Access Consortium New Active Substance Work-Sharing Initiative (NASWSI): Survey Results and Recommendations.制药行业对准入联盟新活性物质工作共享倡议(NASWSI)的看法与经验:调查结果与建议
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 May;58(3):557-566. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00624-7. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
5
UK paediatric speech and language therapists' perceptions on the use of telehealth in current and future clinical practice: An application of the APEASE criteria.英国儿科言语治疗师对远程医疗在当前和未来临床实践中应用的看法:APPEASE 标准的应用。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):1163-1179. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12988. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
6
Establishment of an international Consortium for Research in Eating Disorders (CoRe-ED): Analysis of early-stage participant involvement and expectations.饮食失调研究国际联盟(CoRe-ED)的成立:早期参与者参与情况及期望分析
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jul 15;13(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01336-5.
7
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
8
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
10
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.