Centre for Educational Research in Medical Sciences (CERMS), Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 8;24(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05258-9.
Effective communication is the key to a successful relationship between doctors and their patients. Empathy facilitates effective communication, but physicians vary in their ability to empathize with patients. Listening styles are a potential source of this difference. We aimed to assess empathy and listening styles among medical students and whether students with certain listening styles are more empathetic.
In this cross-sectional study, 97 medical students completed the Jefferson scale of Empathy (JSE) and the revised version of the Listening Styles Profile (LSP-R). The relationship between empathy and listening styles was assessed by comparing JSE scores across different listening styles using ANOVA in SPSS software. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Overall, the students showed a mean empathy score of 103 ± 14 on JSE. Empathy scores were lower among clinical students compared to preclinical students. Most of the medical students preferred the analytical listening style. The proportion of students who preferred the relational listening style was lower among clinical students compared to preclinical students. There was no significant relationship between any of the listening styles with empathy.
Our results do not support an association between any particular listening style with medical students' empathic ability. We propose that students who have better empathetic skills might shift between listening styles flexibly rather than sticking to a specific listening style.
有效的沟通是医生与患者之间建立成功关系的关键。同理心有助于有效沟通,但医生在同理心方面的能力存在差异。倾听风格是这种差异的潜在来源。我们旨在评估医学生的同理心和倾听风格,以及是否具有某些倾听风格的学生更具同理心。
在这项横断面研究中,97 名医学生完成了杰斐逊同理心量表(JSE)和修订后的倾听风格量表(LSP-R)。使用 SPSS 软件中的 ANOVA 比较不同倾听风格下的 JSE 评分,评估同理心和倾听风格之间的关系。p 值小于 0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
总体而言,学生在 JSE 上的平均同理心得分为 103±14。与临床学生相比,预科学生的同理心得分较低。大多数医学生更喜欢分析性倾听风格。与预科学生相比,临床学生中更喜欢关系性倾听风格的学生比例较低。没有任何一种倾听风格与同理心之间存在显著关系。
我们的研究结果不支持任何特定的倾听风格与医学生同理心能力之间存在关联。我们提出,具有更好同理心技能的学生可能会灵活地在倾听风格之间转换,而不是坚持特定的倾听风格。