Shahzeydi Amir, Farzi Sedigheh, Tarrahi Mohammad Javad, Sabouhi Fakhri, Babaei Sima, Yazdannik Ahmadreza
Pediatric Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Department of Adult Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 8;23(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01840-0.
The nursing process is a systematic method for identifying the patient's problems and planning to resolve them. It is also a crucial pillar of high-quality nursing care. Nursing internship students may lack the necessary skills to implement the nursing process due to the increased independence, the absence of constant professorial supervision, and limited experience. The clinical supervision model is a method of clinical education that bridges the gap between theory and practice.
This study was conducted to investigate the impact of the clinical supervision model on the performance of nursing internship students in each of the five stages of the nursing process, as well as overall.
This experimental study was conducted in 2022. The 70 eligible internship students were conveniently selected and randomly assigned to either an intervention or a control group. In the present study, the clinical supervision model was implemented for the intervention group, while the control group received routine supervision. This was carried out over six sessions in three months. The data collection was conducted using a researcher-developed checklist of nursing process-based performance in both groups. Moreover, the Manchester questionnaire was used to evaluate the model in the intervention group. The variables considered as confounding factors included age, gender, marital status, number of monthly shifts, and grades of the nursing process credit completed in the third semester. SPSS version 16 software, descriptive statistics (frequency distribution, percentage, mean, and standard deviation), and analytical statistics (independent t-test, chi square, repeated measures Anova and LSD) were used to analyze the data.
Intergroup analysis revealed that there was no significant difference between the scores of nursing process steps and the total score before the intervention in the control and intervention groups, as well as in baseline characteristics (P > 0.05). According to the intragroup analysis, the intervention group showed a significant increase in both the total scores and scores of nursing process steps over time (P < 0.001), whereas the control group exhibited contradictory results (P > 0.05). Finally, the "P-Value Intervention" demonstrated the effectiveness of this training model in improving the performance of the intervention group based on the nursing process compared to the control group. The mean score of the Manchester questionnaire in the intervention group was 136.74, indicating the high impact of implementing the clinical supervision model in the intervention group.
The results indicated that the implementation of the clinical supervision model led to improved utilization of the nursing process by nursing internship students at all stages. Therefore, it is recommended that nurse educators utilize the clinical supervision model by providing feedback on errors in action during supervision sessions to enhance the quality of nursing care provided by nursing internship students and improve patient safety in clinical environment.
护理程序是识别患者问题并规划解决方案的系统方法。它也是高质量护理的关键支柱。由于独立性增强、缺乏教授的持续监督以及经验有限,护理实习生可能缺乏实施护理程序所需的技能。临床监督模式是一种弥合理论与实践差距的临床教育方法。
本研究旨在调查临床监督模式对护理实习生在护理程序五个阶段及整体表现的影响。
本实验研究于2022年进行。方便选取70名符合条件的实习生并随机分为干预组或对照组。在本研究中,对干预组实施临床监督模式,而对照组接受常规监督。这在三个月内分六个阶段进行。两组均使用研究人员编制的基于护理程序表现的检查表收集数据。此外,使用曼彻斯特问卷对干预组的该模式进行评估。被视为混杂因素的变量包括年龄、性别、婚姻状况、每月轮班次数以及第三学期完成的护理程序学分成绩。使用SPSS 16版软件、描述性统计(频率分布、百分比、均值和标准差)以及分析性统计(独立t检验、卡方检验、重复测量方差分析和LSD)对数据进行分析。
组间分析显示,对照组和干预组干预前护理程序步骤得分及总分以及基线特征方面均无显著差异(P > 0.05)。根据组内分析,干预组随时间推移护理程序总分及步骤得分均显著增加(P < 0.001),而对照组结果相反(P > 0.05)。最后,“P值干预”表明与对照组相比,该培训模式在基于护理程序提高干预组表现方面有效。干预组曼彻斯特问卷的平均得分是136.74,表明在干预组实施临床监督模式的影响很大。
结果表明,临床监督模式的实施使护理实习生在各个阶段对护理程序的运用得到改善。因此,建议护理教育工作者通过在监督环节对行动中的错误提供反馈来运用临床监督模式,以提高护理实习生提供的护理质量并改善临床环境中的患者安全。