Suppr超能文献

模拟训练与基于问题的情景对提高毕业护理学生报告药物错误能力的效果比较:一项准实验研究。

Comparison of the effects of simulation training and problem-based scenarios on the improvement of graduating nursing students to speak up about medication errors: A quasi-experimental study.

机构信息

School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, 250 Wuxing Street, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.

School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, 250 Wuxing Street, Taipei 11031, Taiwan; Department of Emergency, Taipei Medical University Hospital, 252 Wuxing Street, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Apr;87:104359. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104359. Epub 2020 Jan 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication administration errors are common among new nurses. Nursing students might be less willing to speak up about errors because of a lack of knowledge and experience.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of simulation training and problem-based scenarios on speaking up about medication errors among graduating nursing students.

DESIGN

Prospective, controlled experimental study design.

SETTING

A university four-year nursing program in Taiwan.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, 93 graduating nursing students in their last semester were recruited. Sixty-six students who received both a problem-based scenario and medication administration simulation training comprised the experimental group, while 27 students who received problem-based scenarios alone comprised the control group.

METHODS

Experimental group students underwent 2 h of simulation training. This training class was designed based on Kolb's experiential learning theory for knowledge development and speaking up about errors. Students in both groups administered medications in problem-based scenarios with eight embedded errors. Students' performance in speaking up about medication errors was directly observed and graded using an objective structured checklist. The McNeamer Chi-squared test, paired t-test, Z test, t-test, and Hedges' g effect size were conducted.

RESULTS

The number of times participants spoke up about medication errors significantly improved in both the experimental group (pre-test: 2.05 ± 1.12 and post-test 6.14 ± 1.25, t = 22.85, p<0.001) and control group (pretest: 2.04 ± 1.16 and post-test: 4.26 ± 1.63, t = 6.33, p<0.001). However, after the intervention, the mean number of times participants spoke up about medication errors in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (t = 5.99, p<0.001) in the post-test.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulation training exhibited more-significant improvements than problem-based scenarios. Nursing schools and hospitals should incorporate simulation training or at least problem-based scenarios to improve medication safety.

摘要

背景

给药错误在新护士中很常见。护理学生可能由于缺乏知识和经验而不太愿意对错误发表意见。

目的

检验模拟培训和基于问题的情景对毕业护理学生报告药物错误的影响。

设计

前瞻性、对照实验研究设计。

地点

台湾一所大学四年制护理项目。

参与者

共招募了 93 名最后一学期的毕业护理学生。接受基于问题的情景和药物管理模拟培训的 66 名学生为实验组,而仅接受基于问题的情景的 27 名学生为对照组。

方法

实验组学生接受 2 小时的模拟培训。该培训课程是根据 Kolb 的体验式学习理论设计的,旨在促进知识发展和错误报告。两组学生都在基于问题的情景中给予药物,其中包含 8 个嵌入式错误。使用客观结构化检查表直接观察和评分学生在报告药物错误方面的表现。进行了 McNeamer Chi-squared 检验、配对 t 检验、Z 检验、t 检验和 Hedges' g 效应量。

结果

实验组(预测试:2.05±1.12 和后测试:6.14±1.25,t=22.85,p<0.001)和对照组(预测试:2.04±1.16 和后测试:4.26±1.63,t=6.33,p<0.001)中,参与者报告药物错误的次数均显著增加。然而,干预后实验组参与者报告药物错误的平均次数明显高于对照组(t=5.99,p<0.001)。

结论

模拟培训比基于问题的情景表现出更显著的改善。护理学校和医院应将模拟培训或至少基于问题的情景纳入其中,以提高药物安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验