Food Allergy Research Section, Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
Clinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Md.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Jun;153(6):1634-1646. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.03.001. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
Systemic allergic reactions (sARs) following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines were initially reported at a higher rate than after traditional vaccines.
We aimed to evaluate the safety of revaccination in these individuals and to interrogate mechanisms underlying these reactions.
In this randomized, double-blinded, phase 2 trial, participants aged 16 to 69 years who previously reported a convincing sAR to their first dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine were randomly assigned to receive a second dose of BNT162b2 (Comirnaty) vaccine and placebo on consecutive days in a blinded, 1:1 crossover fashion at the National Institutes of Health. An open-label BNT162b2 booster was offered 5 months later if the second dose did not result in severe sAR. None of the participants received the mRNA-1273 (Spikevax) vaccine during the study. The primary end point was recurrence of sAR following second dose and booster vaccination; exploratory end points included biomarker measurements.
Of 111 screened participants, 18 were randomly assigned to receive study interventions. Eight received BNT162b2 second dose followed by placebo; 8 received placebo followed by BNT162b2 second dose; 2 withdrew before receiving any study intervention. All 16 participants received the booster dose. Following second dose and booster vaccination, sARs recurred in 2 participants (12.5%; 95% CI, 1.6 to 38.3). No sAR occurred after placebo. An anaphylaxis mimic, immunization stress-related response (ISRR), occurred more commonly than sARs following both vaccine and placebo and was associated with higher predose anxiety scores, paresthesias, and distinct vital sign and biomarker changes.
Our findings support revaccination of individuals who report sARs to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Distinct clinical and laboratory features may distinguish sARs from ISRRs.
与传统疫苗相比,新冠肺炎(COVID-19)mRNA 疫苗接种后全身过敏反应(sAR)的报告率最初更高。
我们旨在评估这些个体再次接种疫苗的安全性,并探究这些反应的潜在机制。
在这项随机、双盲、2 期试验中,年龄在 16 至 69 岁之间的参与者曾报告过他们首剂 COVID-19 mRNA 疫苗发生过令人信服的 sAR,他们被随机分配在连续两天内以 1:1 交叉的方式接受 BNT162b2(Comirnaty)疫苗和安慰剂,在 NIH 中以双盲方式进行。如果第二剂未导致严重 sAR,则在 5 个月后提供开放标签的 BNT162b2 加强针。在研究期间,参与者均未接种 mRNA-1273(Spikevax)疫苗。主要终点是第二剂和加强针接种后 sAR 的复发;探索性终点包括生物标志物测量。
在 111 名筛查参与者中,有 18 名被随机分配接受研究干预。8 名接受 BNT162b2 第二剂,然后是安慰剂;8 名接受安慰剂,然后是 BNT162b2 第二剂;2 名在接受任何研究干预之前退出。所有 16 名参与者均接受了加强剂量。在第二剂和加强针接种后,2 名参与者(12.5%;95%CI,1.6 至 38.3)出现 sAR 复发。安慰剂后无 sAR 发生。与疫苗和安慰剂后发生的 sAR 相比,过敏模拟反应(ISRR)更为常见,与较高的预剂量焦虑评分、感觉异常、明显的生命体征和生物标志物变化有关。
我们的研究结果支持对报告 COVID-19 mRNA 疫苗全身过敏反应的个体进行再次接种。独特的临床和实验室特征可能将 sAR 与 ISRRs 区分开来。