• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态评估 CHADS-VASc 和 HAS-BLED 评分在预测心房颤动患者缺血性卒中和大出血中的作用。

Dynamic assessment of CHADS-VASc and HAS-BLED scores for predicting ischemic stroke and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients.

机构信息

Servicio de Hematología y Oncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, Universidad de Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), Murcia, Spain.

Facultad de Enfermería, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Universidad de Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), El Palmar, Murcia, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Spain; Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2024 Oct;77(10):835-842. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2024.02.011. Epub 2024 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.rec.2024.02.011
PMID:38460882
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Stroke and bleeding risks in atrial fibrillation (AF) are often assessed at baseline to predict outcomes years later. We investigated whether dynamic changes in CHADS-VASc and HAS-BLED scores over time modify risk prediction.

METHODS

We included patients with AF who were stable while taking vitamin K antagonists. During a 6-year follow-up, all ischemic strokes/transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and major bleeding events were recorded. CHADS-VASc and HAS-BLED were recalculated every 2-years and tested for clinical outcomes at 2-year periods.

RESULTS

We included 1361 patients (mean CHADS-VASc and HAS-BLED 4.0±1.7 and 2.9±1.2). During the follow-up, 156 (11.5%) patients had an ischemic stroke/TIA and 269 (19.8%) had a major bleeding event. Compared with the baseline CHADS-VASc, the CHADS-VASc recalculated at 2 years had higher predictive ability for ischemic stroke/TIA during the period from 2 to 4 years. Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) showed improvements in sensitivity and better reclassification. The CHADS-VASc recalculated at 4 years had better predictive performance than the baseline CHADS-VASc during the period from 4 to 6 years, with an improvement in IDI and an enhancement of the reclassification. The recalculated HAS-BLED at 2-years had higher predictive ability than the baseline score for major bleeding during the period from 2 to 4 years, with significant improvements in sensitivity and reclassification. A slight enhancement in sensitivity was observed with the HAS-BLED score recalculated at 4 years compared with the baseline score.

CONCLUSIONS

In AF patients, stroke and bleeding risks are dynamic and change over time. The CHADS-VASc and HAS-BLED scores should be regularly reassessed, particularly for accurate stroke risk prediction.

摘要

介绍和目的

心房颤动(AF)的中风和出血风险通常在基线时进行评估,以预测数年后的结果。我们研究了随着时间的推移,CHADS-VASc 和 HAS-BLED 评分的动态变化是否会改变风险预测。

方法

我们纳入了正在服用维生素 K 拮抗剂且稳定的 AF 患者。在 6 年的随访期间,记录了所有缺血性中风/短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)和主要出血事件。每 2 年重新计算 CHADS-VASc 和 HAS-BLED,并在 2 年期间测试临床结局。

结果

我们纳入了 1361 名患者(平均 CHADS-VASc 和 HAS-BLED 分别为 4.0±1.7 和 2.9±1.2)。在随访期间,156 名(11.5%)患者发生缺血性中风/TIA,269 名(19.8%)患者发生主要出血事件。与基线 CHADS-VASc 相比,第 2 年重新计算的 CHADS-VASc 在第 2 至 4 年期间对缺血性中风/TIA 的预测能力更高。综合判别改善(IDI)和净重新分类改善(NRI)显示了敏感性的提高和更好的重新分类。第 4 年重新计算的 CHADS-VASc 在第 4 至 6 年期间的预测性能优于基线 CHADS-VASc,IDI 有所提高,重新分类得到增强。第 2 年重新计算的 HAS-BLED 在第 2 至 4 年期间对主要出血的预测能力高于基线评分,敏感性和重新分类均有显著提高。与基线评分相比,第 4 年重新计算的 HAS-BLED 敏感性略有提高。

结论

在 AF 患者中,中风和出血风险是动态的,会随时间而变化。CHADS-VASc 和 HAS-BLED 评分应定期重新评估,特别是为了准确预测中风风险。

相似文献

1
Dynamic assessment of CHADS-VASc and HAS-BLED scores for predicting ischemic stroke and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients.动态评估 CHADS-VASc 和 HAS-BLED 评分在预测心房颤动患者缺血性卒中和大出血中的作用。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2024 Oct;77(10):835-842. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2024.02.011. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
2
The HAS-BLED score has better prediction accuracy for major bleeding than CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc scores in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation.在接受抗凝治疗的房颤患者中,HAS-BLED 评分对大出血的预测准确性优于 CHADS2 或 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 10;62(23):2199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1623. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
3
Prior ischemic strokes are non-inferior for predicting future ischemic strokes than CHADS-VASc score in hemodialysis patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.对于非瓣膜性心房颤动的血液透析患者,既往缺血性脑卒中与 CHADS-VASc 评分预测未来缺血性脑卒中的效果相当。
BMC Nephrol. 2021 May 15;22(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12882-021-02384-0.
4
Enhancing the 'real world' prediction of cardiovascular events and major bleeding with the CHADS-VASc and HAS-BLED scores using multiple biomarkers.利用多种生物标志物增强 CHADS-VASc 和 HAS-BLED 评分对心血管事件和大出血的“真实世界”预测能力。
Ann Med. 2018 Feb;50(1):26-34. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2017.1378429. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
5
Stroke and bleeding risk scores in patients with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease: evaluating 'valvular heart disease' in a nationwide cohort study.心房颤动和心脏瓣膜病患者的卒中与出血风险评分:在全国范围内队列研究中评估“心脏瓣膜病”。
Europace. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):33-40. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy151.
6
Prediction of long-term net clinical outcomes using the TIMI-AF score: Comparison with CHADS-VASc and HAS-BLED.使用 TIMI-AF 评分预测长期净临床结局:与 CHADS-VASc 和 HAS-BLED 的比较。
Am Heart J. 2018 Mar;197:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
7
Comparison of the CHADS-VASc, CHADS, HAS-BLED, ORBIT, and ATRIA Risk Scores in Predicting Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants-Associated Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.CHADS-VASc、CHADS、HAS-BLED、ORBIT和ATRIA风险评分在预测心房颤动患者非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药相关出血中的比较
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120(9):1549-1556. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.051. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
8
Comparison of the CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores for the prediction of clinically relevant bleeding in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: the AMADEUS trial.比较 CHADS2、CHA2DS2-VASc 和 HAS-BLED 评分在预测抗凝治疗的心房颤动患者临床相关出血中的作用:AMADEUS 试验。
Thromb Haemost. 2013 Nov;110(5):1074-9. doi: 10.1160/TH13-07-0552. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
9
Relationship of Aging and Incident Comorbidities to Stroke Risk in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.老龄化和共病事件与房颤患者中风风险的关系。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jan 16;71(2):122-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.085.
10
Long-Term Stroke Risk Prediction in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison of the ABC-Stroke and CHADS-VASc Scores.心房颤动患者的长期卒中风险预测:ABC-卒中与CHADS-VASc评分的比较
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 20;6(7):e006490. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006490.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Presence of Native Valvular Disease in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Using the EHRA (Evaluated Heartvalves, Rheumatic, or Artificial) Classification.使用EHRA(评估心脏瓣膜、风湿性或人工瓣膜)分类法评估心房颤动患者中天然瓣膜疾病的存在情况。
Clin Cardiol. 2025 Aug;48(8):e70172. doi: 10.1002/clc.70172.
2
Evaluation of CHADS-VA Score and Systemic Inflammatory Indexes in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Case-Control Study.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者CHADS-VA评分与全身炎症指标的评估:一项病例对照研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 29;14(13):4601. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134601.
3
Concomitant Diabetes and Atrial Fibrillation: Epicardial Fat and Macrophage-Related Mechanisms.
糖尿病与心房颤动并存:心外膜脂肪与巨噬细胞相关机制
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2025 Jul;41(5):e70065. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.70065.
4
Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Valvular Diseases and Prosthetic Valves: Why Not?直接口服抗凝剂用于瓣膜病和人工瓣膜:为何不可?
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1007/s10557-025-07736-8.
5
Multifactorial Risk Stratification in Patients with Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Analysis.心力衰竭、慢性肾脏病和心房颤动患者的多因素风险分层:一项综合分析
Life (Basel). 2025 May 14;15(5):786. doi: 10.3390/life15050786.
6
Atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke in cancer: the latest scientific evidence, current management, and future directions.癌症中的心房颤动与缺血性卒中:最新科学证据、当前管理及未来方向
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Apr 26. doi: 10.1007/s11239-025-03104-3.
7
The 2024 European Society of Cardiology Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines: A Moving Goalpost.《2024年欧洲心脏病学会心房颤动指南:不断变化的目标》
Eur Cardiol. 2025 Feb 13;20:e01. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2024.55. eCollection 2025.
8
Does hospitalisation improve oral anticoagulant optimisation in patients with atrial fibrillation?住院治疗能否改善房颤患者的口服抗凝治疗优化情况?
Eur J Clin Invest. 2025 Apr;55(4):e70011. doi: 10.1111/eci.70011. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
9
Poor clinical outcomes associated to multimorbidity, frailty and malnutrition in patients with atrial fibrillation.心房颤动患者中与多种疾病、虚弱和营养不良相关的不良临床结局。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2025 Jan;29(1):100430. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100430. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
10
Comparing CHADS-VA and CHADS-VASc scores for stroke risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation: a temporal trends analysis from the retrospective Finnish AntiCoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation (FinACAF) cohort.比较CHADS-VA和CHADS-VASc评分在房颤患者卒中风险分层中的应用:来自芬兰房颤抗凝(FinACAF)回顾性队列的时间趋势分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Jun 10;43:100967. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100967. eCollection 2024 Aug.