• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学会选择:决策初始习得背后的行为动力学

Learning to Choose: Behavioral Dynamics Underlying the Initial Acquisition of Decision Making.

作者信息

White Samantha R, Preston Michael W, Swanson Kyra, Laubach Mark

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

bioRxiv. 2024 Mar 3:2024.02.28.582581. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.28.582581.

DOI:10.1101/2024.02.28.582581
PMID:38464283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10925347/
Abstract

Current theories of decision making propose that decisions arise through competition between choice options. Computational models of the decision process estimate how quickly information about choice options is integrated and how much information is needed to trigger a choice. Experiments using this approach typically report data from well-trained participants. As such, we do not know how the decision process evolves as a decision-making task is learned for the first time. To address this gap, we used a behavioral design separating learning the value of choice options from learning to make choices. We trained male rats to respond to single visual stimuli with different reward values. Then, we trained them to make choices between pairs of stimuli. Initially, the rats responded more slowly when presented with choices. However, as they gained experience in making choices, this slowing reduced. Response slowing on choice trials persisted throughout the testing period. We found that it was specifically associated with increased exponential variability when the rats chose the higher value stimulus. Additionally, our analysis using drift diffusion modeling revealed that the rats required less information to make choices over time. Surprisingly, we observed reductions in the decision threshold after just a single session of choice learning. These findings provide new insights into the learning process of decision-making tasks. They suggest that the value of choice options and the ability to make choices are learned separately, and that experience plays a crucial role in improving decision-making performance.

摘要

当前的决策理论提出,决策是通过选择选项之间的竞争产生的。决策过程的计算模型估计关于选择选项的信息整合速度有多快,以及触发一个选择需要多少信息。使用这种方法的实验通常报告来自训练有素的参与者的数据。因此,我们不知道当首次学习决策任务时,决策过程是如何演变的。为了填补这一空白,我们采用了一种行为设计,将学习选择选项的价值与学习做出选择区分开来。我们训练雄性大鼠对具有不同奖励价值的单一视觉刺激做出反应。然后,我们训练它们在成对的刺激之间做出选择。最初,大鼠在面对选择时反应较慢。然而,随着它们在做出选择方面获得经验,这种反应变慢的情况减少了。在整个测试期间,选择试验中的反应变慢一直持续。我们发现,当大鼠选择较高价值刺激时,它与指数变异性增加特别相关。此外,我们使用漂移扩散模型的分析表明,随着时间的推移,大鼠做出选择所需的信息越来越少。令人惊讶的是,我们在仅进行了一次选择学习后就观察到了决策阈值的降低。这些发现为决策任务的学习过程提供了新的见解。它们表明,选择选项的价值和做出选择的能力是分别习得的,并且经验在提高决策表现方面起着至关重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/6e2334cb535f/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/a111012b96b2/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/088ddeae2526/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/75bcfabae8df/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/2f8603cc9dbe/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/9776776b6ad7/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/b2a6f4890268/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/e5f0031f11a4/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/6e2334cb535f/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/a111012b96b2/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/088ddeae2526/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/75bcfabae8df/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/2f8603cc9dbe/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/9776776b6ad7/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/b2a6f4890268/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/e5f0031f11a4/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaac/10925347/6e2334cb535f/nihpp-2024.02.28.582581v1-f0008.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning to Choose: Behavioral Dynamics Underlying the Initial Acquisition of Decision Making.学会选择:决策初始习得背后的行为动力学
bioRxiv. 2024 Mar 3:2024.02.28.582581. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.28.582581.
2
Learning to Choose: Behavioral Dynamics Underlying the Initial Acquisition of Decision-Making.学习选择:决策制定初始获取过程中的行为动态。
eNeuro. 2024 May 17;11(5). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0142-24.2024. Print 2024 May.
3
The Role of the Rat Prefrontal Cortex and Sex Differences in Decision-Making.前额皮质在大鼠决策中的作用和性别差异。
J Neurosci. 2024 Nov 13;44(46):e0550242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0550-24.2024.
4
Visual fixation patterns during economic choice reflect covert valuation processes that emerge with learning.在经济选择过程中,视觉固视模式反映了随着学习而出现的隐性估值过程。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 5;116(45):22795-22801. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906662116. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
5
Normative decision rules in changing environments.规范决策规则在不断变化的环境中。
Elife. 2022 Oct 25;11:e79824. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79824.
6
The role of rat prelimbic cortex in decision making.大鼠前扣带回皮质在决策中的作用。
bioRxiv. 2024 Mar 19:2024.03.18.585593. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.18.585593.
7
Sex differences in learning from exploration.从探索中学习的性别差异。
Elife. 2021 Nov 19;10:e69748. doi: 10.7554/eLife.69748.
8
Generalization of value in reinforcement learning by humans.人类在强化学习中的价值泛化。
Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Apr;35(7):1092-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08017.x.
9
Uncovering the computational mechanisms underlying many-alternative choice.揭示多选项选择背后的计算机制。
Elife. 2021 Apr 6;10:e57012. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57012.
10
Local dynamics in decision making: The evolution of preference within and across decisions.决策中的局部动态:决策内和决策间偏好的演变。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2210. doi: 10.1038/srep02210.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategically managing learning during perceptual decision making.战略性地管理感知决策中的学习。
Elife. 2023 Feb 14;12:e64978. doi: 10.7554/eLife.64978.
2
Choice selective inhibition drives stability and competition in decision circuits.选择选择性抑制驱动决策电路的稳定性和竞争。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jan 10;14(1):147. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-35822-8.
3
Paradoxical choice and the reinforcing value of information.矛盾选择与信息的强化价值。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):623-637. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01698-2. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
4
An Open Source Platform for Presenting Dynamic Visual Stimuli.一个用于呈现动态视觉刺激的开源平台。
eNeuro. 2021 Jun 11;8(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0563-20.2021. Print 2021 May-Jun.
5
A flexible framework for simulating and fitting generalized drift-diffusion models.用于模拟和拟合广义漂移扩散模型的灵活框架。
Elife. 2020 Aug 4;9:e56938. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56938.
6
Moving beyond P values: data analysis with estimation graphics.超越P值:使用估计图进行数据分析。
Nat Methods. 2019 Jul;16(7):565-566. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0470-3.
7
Paradoxical choice in rats: Subjective valuation and mechanism of choice.大鼠的矛盾选择:主观评估与选择机制
Behav Processes. 2018 Jul;152:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
8
High-Yield Methods for Accurate Two-Alternative Visual Psychophysics in Head-Fixed Mice.头部固定小鼠中准确的双选择视觉心理物理学的高效方法。
Cell Rep. 2017 Sep 5;20(10):2513-2524. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.047.
9
An Activation Threshold Model for Response Inhibition.一种用于反应抑制的激活阈值模型。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0169320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169320. eCollection 2017.
10
Distinct effects of prefrontal and parietal cortex inactivations on an accumulation of evidence task in the rat.前额叶和顶叶皮质失活对大鼠证据积累任务的不同影响。
Elife. 2015 Apr 14;4:e05457. doi: 10.7554/eLife.05457.