AlSofiani Mohammed E, AlHalees Danah Z, Aljebreen Joud A, Abu Dahesh Joud A, Bamogaddam Ghada S, AlBraithen Ghaida M, Jammah Anwar
Endocrinology and Diabetes, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Internal Medicine/Adult Diabetes and Endocrinology, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 8;16(2):e53844. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53844. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Background The factors considered by physicians when prescribing a glucose-lowering agent to patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in real-world settings are not necessarily consistent with those recommended by clinical practice guidelines. Here, we identify the major factors that drive physicians' selection of glucose-lowering agents in the real world and how these factors may differ by physician's specialty. Methods A web-based survey was conducted among 135 physicians who manage patients with T2D in Saudi Arabia. Physicians were categorized according to their specialty into "specialists" (endocrinologists and/or diabetologists) and "generalists" (internists, family physicians, and primary care physicians). Physicians were asked about the type of glucose-lowering medication that they would typically prescribe in certain clinical scenarios and what factors drive such a selection. Results Sulfonylurea remains the most frequently prescribed second-line agent, as an add-on to metformin, according to 50% of the physicians surveyed. Most physicians (89%) reported prescribing glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) to less than half of their patients with T2D and ischemic heart disease; over two-thirds reported prescribing sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) to less than half of their patients with T2D and heart failure. When prescribing GLP-1RAs, the cost was a "major consideration" by 75% and 65% of the specialists and generalists, respectively. Likewise, when prescribing SGLT-2i, the cost was a major consideration by 57% and 71% of the specialists and generalists, respectively. Several other factors differed between the generalists and specialists when prescribing thiazolidinedione(TZD), sulfonylurea, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, GLP-1RAs, and SLGT-2i, but not insulin. Conclusion Our findings highlight several challenges faced by physicians in the real world that may prevent them from adopting the latest evidence-based guidelines when managing patients with T2D. Health policies to increase accessibility to novel glucose-lowering agents, particularly for patients with T2D and cardiovascular/renal diseases, are needed.
背景 在现实临床环境中,医生为2型糖尿病(T2D)患者开降糖药时考虑的因素未必与临床实践指南所推荐的因素一致。在此,我们确定了现实世界中驱动医生选择降糖药的主要因素,以及这些因素在不同专业医生之间可能存在的差异。方法 对沙特阿拉伯135名治疗T2D患者的医生进行了一项基于网络的调查。医生根据专业分为“专科医生”(内分泌科医生和/或糖尿病专科医生)和“全科医生”(内科医生、家庭医生和初级保健医生)。询问医生在某些临床场景中通常会开哪种降糖药,以及促使他们做出这种选择的因素。结果 根据50%接受调查的医生,磺脲类药物仍是最常被开具的二线药物,作为二甲双胍的附加用药。大多数医生(89%)报告称,为不到一半的T2D合并缺血性心脏病患者开具胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA);超过三分之二的医生报告称,为不到一半的T2D合并心力衰竭患者开具钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT-2i)。在开具GLP-1RA时,成本分别是75%的专科医生和65%的全科医生的“主要考虑因素”。同样,在开具SGLT-2i时,成本分别是57%的专科医生和71%的全科医生的主要考虑因素。在开具噻唑烷二酮类(TZD)、磺脲类、二肽基肽酶4(DPP-4)抑制剂、GLP-1RA和SGLT-2i时,全科医生和专科医生在其他几个因素上存在差异,但胰岛素不存在这种差异。结论 我们的研究结果突出了现实世界中医生面临的几个挑战,这些挑战可能会阻碍他们在管理T2D患者时采用最新的循证指南。需要制定卫生政策,以提高新型降糖药的可及性,特别是对于T2D合并心血管/肾脏疾病的患者。