Johnson Alexander J, Wharton Benjamin R, Geraghty Elisabeth H, Bradsell Hannah, Ishikawa Andrew, McCarty Eric C, Bravman Jonathan T, Frank Rachel M
Saint Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA.
University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Mar 7;12(3):23259671241232707. doi: 10.1177/23259671241232707. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Social media (SM) use by orthopaedic surgeons is becoming increasingly common; nonetheless, it needs to be clarified how patients perceive the content posted by physicians.
To characterize SM content posted by orthopaedic surgeons while investigating patient perceptions of this content and how it may influence their health care decisions.
Cross-sectional study.
Posts on SM outlets by orthopaedic surgeons were reviewed and categorized. A survey to assess patient perception of these categories was administered between December 2021 and February 2022 in the clinics of 3 orthopaedic surgeons. Survey results were analyzed for differences in patient SM use and perception of SM content types.
There were 250 completed surveys. SM use was high among all age groups; however, the 18 to 24 years (87.1%) and 25 to 34 years (86.4%) age groups were more likely than older age groups to report daily use ( = .002). Overall, 17% of patients reported using SM to see information about their health care at least once per month, 21% reported reviewing the SM account of a physician at least once per month, 19% reported that they were likely or very likely to view the SM account of their physician, and 23% reported that SM content was likely or very likely to influence which physician they see. Patients held the most consistently positive view of posts that educated patients, discussed sports team coverage, and provided patient testimonials. Patients had consistently neutral views of posts educating colleagues, discussing presentations at national meetings, displaying aspects of surgeons' personal lives, and supporting marginalized groups. Several post categories elicited highly polarized responses-including those discussing research publications and showing surgical techniques or pictures/videos taken during surgery. Respondents had a consistently negative response to posts making political statements.
SM is likely a useful tool to help physicians interact with patients. Physicians who wish to interact with patients should consider posting content viewed most positively-including posts educating patients, discussing sports team coverage, and providing patient testimonials. Content that is viewed less favorably should be posted sparingly or with a sensitive tag.
骨科医生使用社交媒体(SM)的情况越来越普遍;然而,患者如何看待医生发布的内容仍需阐明。
描述骨科医生在社交媒体上发布的内容,同时调查患者对这些内容的看法以及它可能如何影响他们的医疗保健决策。
横断面研究。
对骨科医生在社交媒体平台上的帖子进行审查和分类。2021年12月至2022年2月期间,在3位骨科医生的诊所进行了一项调查,以评估患者对这些类别的看法。分析调查结果,以了解患者使用社交媒体的情况以及对社交媒体内容类型的看法差异。
共完成250份调查问卷。所有年龄组中社交媒体的使用率都很高;然而,18至24岁(87.1%)和25至34岁(86.4%)年龄组比年龄较大的组更有可能报告每天使用(P = 0.002)。总体而言,17%的患者报告每月至少使用一次社交媒体查看有关其医疗保健的信息,21%的患者报告每月至少查看一次医生的社交媒体账户,19%的患者报告他们可能或非常可能查看其医生的社交媒体账户,23%的患者报告社交媒体内容可能或非常可能影响他们选择看哪位医生。患者对教育患者、讨论运动队报道和提供患者推荐的帖子看法最为一致地积极。患者对教育同事、讨论在全国会议上的演讲、展示外科医生个人生活方面以及支持边缘化群体的帖子看法一直较为中立。几个帖子类别引发了高度两极分化的反应,包括那些讨论研究出版物以及展示手术技术或手术期间拍摄的图片/视频的帖子。受访者对发表政治声明的帖子一直持负面反应。
社交媒体可能是帮助医生与患者互动的有用工具。希望与患者互动的医生应考虑发布最受好评的内容,包括教育患者 的帖子、讨论运动队报道和提供患者推荐。不太受青睐的内容应谨慎发布或加上敏感标签。