• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在推动运动医学骨科医生参与社交媒体方面,照片墙(Instagram)的表现优于推特(Twitter)。

Instagram Outperforms Twitter in Driving Social Media Engagement Among Sports Medicine Orthopaedic Surgeons.

作者信息

Edmonson Alexis B, Clark Sean C, Ierulli Victoria K, Mulcahey Mary K

机构信息

Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Dec 30;6(1):100850. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100850. eCollection 2024 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100850
PMID:38234992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10792685/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the content posted by sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons on Instagram and Twitter and to evaluate the associated engagement.

METHODS

Data were collected from sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons' Instagram profiles and Twitter profiles between December 2020 and June 2022. The median number of total number of likes, comments, and retweets was calculated. The content of posts from both platforms was divided into the following categories: personal life, research, patient testimony, day in the life, pathway to becoming a physician, clinical cases, medical facts, and team coverage.

RESULTS

Data from 71 Instagram profiles and 39 Twitter profiles were used in this study. A total of 1,193 posts were identified on Instagram and 1,284 posts were identified on Twitter. The personal life category had the greatest number of posts on Instagram (303, 25.4%), whereas the medical facts category had the greatest number of posts on Twitter (251, 19.5%). Pathway to becoming a physician had the greatest median number of likes on both Instagram (97.5, range 48-2,467) and Twitter (19, range 0-50) and the greatest median number of comments on Instagram at 16 (range 1-203). The team coverage category on Instagram had the greatest percentage of likes per follower at 9.9%. A significantly greater percentage of orthopaedic surgeons posted about day in the life content, medical facts, and research on Twitter in comparison with Instagram. Instagram resulted in significantly more social media engagement than Twitter in all 8 categories ( < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Instagram resulted in significantly more social media engagement across all categories in comparison with Twitter with team coverage, personal life, and pathway to becoming a physician being the most popular categories.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The information learned in this study may help sports surgeons understand how they may best utilize social media to engage with others and enhance their clinical practice.

摘要

目的

确定运动医学骨科医生在照片墙(Instagram)和推特(Twitter)上发布的内容,并评估相关的互动情况。

方法

收集2020年12月至2022年6月期间运动医学骨科医生的照片墙资料和推特资料。计算点赞、评论和转发总数的中位数。两个平台上的帖子内容分为以下几类:个人生活、研究、患者证言、日常生活、成为医生的途径、临床病例、医学事实和团队报道。

结果

本研究使用了来自71个照片墙资料和39个推特资料的数据。在照片墙上共识别出1193条帖子,在推特上识别出1284条帖子。个人生活类别在照片墙上的帖子数量最多(303条,25.4%),而医学事实类别在推特上的帖子数量最多(251条,19.5%)。成为医生的途径在照片墙(中位数为97.5,范围为48 - 2467)和推特(中位数为19,范围为0 - 50)上的点赞中位数最高,在照片墙上的评论中位数最高,为16条(范围为1 - 203)。照片墙上团队报道类别的每个关注者点赞百分比最高,为9.9%。与照片墙相比,骨科医生在推特上发布关于日常生活内容、医学事实和研究的比例显著更高。在所有8个类别中,照片墙带来的社交媒体互动明显多于推特(P < .05)。

结论

与推特相比,照片墙在所有类别中带来的社交媒体互动明显更多,其中团队报道、个人生活和成为医生的途径是最受欢迎的类别。

临床意义

本研究中获得的信息可能有助于运动外科医生了解如何最好地利用社交媒体与他人互动并提升他们的临床实践。

相似文献

1
Instagram Outperforms Twitter in Driving Social Media Engagement Among Sports Medicine Orthopaedic Surgeons.在推动运动医学骨科医生参与社交媒体方面,照片墙(Instagram)的表现优于推特(Twitter)。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Dec 30;6(1):100850. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100850. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Social media as a tool for engaging medical students interested in orthopaedic surgery.社交媒体作为吸引对骨科手术感兴趣的医学生的一种工具。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2021 May 29;13(2):24443. doi: 10.52965/001c.24443. eCollection 2021.
3
Factors Engaging Users of Diabetes Social Media Channels on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram: Observational Study.社交媒体在糖尿病管理中的应用:基于 Facebook、Twitter 和 Instagram 的用户参与因素观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 29;22(9):e21204. doi: 10.2196/21204.
4
Analysis of Social Media Posts That Promote Women Surgeons.对推广女外科医生的社交媒体帖子的分析。
J Surg Educ. 2023 May;80(5):682-688. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
5
Eliciting Emotion and Action Increases Social Media Engagement: An Analysis of Influential Orthopaedic Surgeons.引发情感和行动可提高社交媒体参与度:对有影响力的骨科医生的分析
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Jul 21;3(5):e1301-e1308. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.05.011. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Social Media and Pediatric Scoliosis: An Analysis of Patient and Surgeon Use.社交媒体与小儿脊柱侧弯:患者及外科医生使用情况分析
Surg Technol Int. 2017 Oct 12;31:189-196.
7
#PlasticSurgery: A Comparative Deep Dive Analysis into Social Media and Plastic Surgery.整形外科学:社交媒体与整形手术的深度比较分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Aug;146(2):413-422. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007001.
8
An Update on Social Media in Academic Plastic Surgery Training Programs: The Rising Trend of Likes, Shares, and Retweets.学术整形外科培训项目中的社交媒体最新情况:点赞、分享和转发量的上升趋势
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Aug;85(2):100-104. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002289.
9
Integrating Social Media and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery: An Analysis of Patient, Surgeon, and Hospital Use.整合社交媒体与前交叉韧带手术:患者、外科医生及医院使用情况分析
Arthroscopy. 2017 Mar;33(3):579-585. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.08.021. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
10
Patterns of General Surgery Residency Social Media Use in the Age of COVID-19.新冠疫情时期普通外科住院医师社交媒体使用模式。
J Surg Educ. 2021 Nov-Dec;78(6):e218-e225. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.04.017. Epub 2021 May 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor.骨科期刊利用社交媒体与影响因子呈正相关。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023 Jul 25;7(7). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00009. eCollection 2023 Jul 1.
2
#OrthoTwitter: Blending Information, Education, and Entertainment Online.# 骨科推特:在线融合信息、教育与娱乐
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Jun 5;106(11):1022-1028. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.01370. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
3
#OrthoTwitter: social media as an educational tool.# 骨科推特:作为教育工具的社交媒体
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Sep 7;7(5):277-284. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000630. eCollection 2021.
4
Social Media Use Continues to Increase Among Orthopaedic Residency Programs in the United States.在美国,骨科住院医师培训项目中社交媒体的使用持续增加。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Sep 23;3(6):e1761-e1767. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.08.004. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Social media as a tool for engaging medical students interested in orthopaedic surgery.社交媒体作为吸引对骨科手术感兴趣的医学生的一种工具。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2021 May 29;13(2):24443. doi: 10.52965/001c.24443. eCollection 2021.
6
The impact of social media presence, age, and patient reported wait times on physician review websites for sports medicine surgeons.社交媒体曝光度、年龄以及患者报告的等待时间对运动医学外科医生在线评价网站的影响。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Jul 14;21:101502. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101502. eCollection 2021 Oct.
7
Physician-Rating Websites and Social Media Usage: A Global Survey of Academic Orthopaedic Surgeons: AOA Critical Issues.医生评级网站和社交媒体使用情况:全球学术骨科医生调查:AOA 关键问题。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Jan 19;104(2):e5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01893.
8
What's Important: How Social Media Can Foster Connectedness: Voices from the #OrthoTwitter Community.重要内容:社交媒体如何促进联系:来自#骨科推特社区的声音。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jun 16;103(12):1152-1154. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01738.
9
Social Media Presence Correlated with Improved Online Review Scores for Spine Surgeons.社交媒体存在与脊柱外科医生在线评分提高相关。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;141:e18-e25. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.045. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
10
How do physician demographics, training, social media usage, online presence, and wait times influence online physician review scores for spine surgeons?医生的人口统计学特征、培训情况、社交媒体使用情况、网络形象以及候诊时间如何影响脊柱外科医生的在线评价得分?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Nov 23;30(2):279-288. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.SPINE18553. Print 2019 Feb 1.