• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同时比较两种生存函数多个特征的推断程序。

Simultaneous inference procedures for the comparison of multiple characteristics of two survival functions.

机构信息

Medical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Data Science, Institute of Medical Statistics, Austria.

Merck Healthcare KGaA, Germany.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Apr;33(4):589-610. doi: 10.1177/09622802241231497. Epub 2024 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1177/09622802241231497
PMID:38465602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11025310/
Abstract

Survival time is the primary endpoint of many randomized controlled trials, and a treatment effect is typically quantified by the hazard ratio under the assumption of proportional hazards. Awareness is increasing that in many settings this assumption is a priori violated, for example, due to delayed onset of drug effect. In these cases, interpretation of the hazard ratio estimate is ambiguous and statistical inference for alternative parameters to quantify a treatment effect is warranted. We consider differences or ratios of milestone survival probabilities or quantiles, differences in restricted mean survival times, and an average hazard ratio to be of interest. Typically, more than one such parameter needs to be reported to assess possible treatment benefits, and in confirmatory trials, the according inferential procedures need to be adjusted for multiplicity. A simple Bonferroni adjustment may be too conservative because the different parameters of interest typically show considerable correlation. Hence simultaneous inference procedures that take into account the correlation are warranted. By using the counting process representation of the mentioned parameters, we show that their estimates are asymptotically multivariate normal and we provide an estimate for their covariance matrix. We propose according to the parametric multiple testing procedures and simultaneous confidence intervals. Also, the logrank test may be included in the framework. Finite sample type I error rate and power are studied by simulation. The methods are illustrated with an example from oncology. A software implementation is provided in the R package nph.

摘要

生存时间是许多随机对照试验的主要终点,并且在假设比例风险的情况下,通常通过风险比来量化治疗效果。人们越来越意识到,在许多情况下,这种假设是先验违反的,例如,由于药物作用的延迟出现。在这些情况下,风险比估计的解释是模糊的,并且需要对替代参数进行统计推断,以量化治疗效果。我们认为生存概率或分位数的差异或比值、受限平均生存时间的差异以及平均风险比是感兴趣的。通常,需要报告多个这样的参数来评估可能的治疗益处,并且在确认性试验中,需要调整相应的推断程序以进行多重性调整。简单的 Bonferroni 调整可能过于保守,因为感兴趣的不同参数通常显示出相当大的相关性。因此,需要进行同时考虑相关性的推断程序。通过使用所提到参数的计数过程表示,我们证明了它们的估计值是渐近多变量正态的,并且我们提供了它们协方差矩阵的估计值。我们根据参数的多重检验程序和同时置信区间提出建议。此外,对数秩检验也可以包含在该框架中。通过模拟研究了有限样本的Ⅰ型错误率和功效。该方法通过肿瘤学的一个示例进行了说明。在 R 包 nph 中提供了软件实现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fbf/11025310/35f7f1954039/10.1177_09622802241231497-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fbf/11025310/10f00ef8e8c2/10.1177_09622802241231497-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fbf/11025310/1514413ce1c7/10.1177_09622802241231497-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fbf/11025310/23c511869da6/10.1177_09622802241231497-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fbf/11025310/35f7f1954039/10.1177_09622802241231497-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fbf/11025310/10f00ef8e8c2/10.1177_09622802241231497-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fbf/11025310/1514413ce1c7/10.1177_09622802241231497-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fbf/11025310/23c511869da6/10.1177_09622802241231497-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fbf/11025310/35f7f1954039/10.1177_09622802241231497-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Simultaneous inference procedures for the comparison of multiple characteristics of two survival functions.同时比较两种生存函数多个特征的推断程序。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Apr;33(4):589-610. doi: 10.1177/09622802241231497. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
2
Utilizing the integrated difference of two survival functions to quantify the treatment contrast for designing, monitoring, and analyzing a comparative clinical study.利用两个生存函数的综合差异来量化治疗对比,以用于设计、监测和分析比较性临床研究。
Clin Trials. 2012 Oct;9(5):570-7. doi: 10.1177/1740774512455464. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Using the geometric average hazard ratio in sample size calculation for time-to-event data with composite endpoints.使用复合终点的生存数据在样本量计算中使用几何平均风险比。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 May 6;21(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01286-x.
5
Designing clinical trials with (restricted) mean survival time endpoint: Practical considerations.设计(受限)平均生存时间终点的临床试验:实用考虑。
Clin Trials. 2020 Jun;17(3):285-294. doi: 10.1177/1740774520905563. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
6
The Average Hazard Ratio - A Good Effect Measure for Time-to-event Endpoints when the Proportional Hazard Assumption is Violated?平均风险比——当比例风险假设不成立时,用于事件发生时间终点的良好效应量度?
Methods Inf Med. 2018 May;57(3):89-100. doi: 10.3414/ME17-01-0058. Epub 2018 May 2.
7
An approach to trial design and analysis in the era of non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect.治疗效果非比例风险时代的试验设计与分析方法。
Trials. 2014 Aug 7;15:314. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-314.
8
A simulation study comparing the power of nine tests of the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials with a time-to-event outcome.一项模拟研究比较了九种用于评估时间事件结局的随机对照试验中处理效应的检验效能。
Trials. 2020 Apr 6;21(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4153-2.
9
Sequential tests for non-proportional hazards data.非比例风险数据的序贯检验。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2017 Jul;23(3):339-352. doi: 10.1007/s10985-016-9360-5. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
10
Empirical power comparison of statistical tests in contemporary phase III randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes in oncology.肿瘤学中以时间为事件的当代 III 期随机对照试验中统计检验的经验功效比较。
Clin Trials. 2020 Dec;17(6):597-606. doi: 10.1177/1740774520940256. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Time-To-Event Analyses in Randomized Controlled Trials Under Non-Proportional Hazards.非比例风险下随机对照试验中事件发生时间分析的统计方法比较
Stat Med. 2025 Feb 28;44(5):e70019. doi: 10.1002/sim.70019.

本文引用的文献

1
Confidence bands in survival analysis.生存分析中的置信带。
Br J Cancer. 2022 Nov;127(9):1636-1641. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01920-5. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
2
Design and analysis of group-sequential clinical trials based on a modestly weighted log-rank test in anticipation of a delayed separation of survival curves: A practical guidance.基于适度加权对数秩检验的序贯临床试验设计与分析,预期生存曲线延迟分离:实用指南
Clin Trials. 2022 Apr;19(2):201-210. doi: 10.1177/17407745211072848. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
3
Robust group sequential designs for trials with survival endpoints and delayed response.
用于具有生存终点和延迟反应试验的稳健组序贯设计。
Biom J. 2022 Feb;64(2):343-360. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202000169. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
4
Critical review of oncology clinical trial design under non-proportional hazards.非比例风险下肿瘤临床试验设计的批判性评价。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021 Jun;162:103350. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103350. Epub 2021 May 12.
5
Statistical Considerations for Sequential Analysis of the Restricted Mean Survival Time for Randomized Clinical Trials.随机临床试验中受限平均生存时间序贯分析的统计学考量
Stat Biopharm Res. 2021;13(2):210-218. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2020.1816491. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
6
Utility of Restricted Mean Survival Time Analysis for Heart Failure Clinical Trial Evaluation and Interpretation.限制平均生存时间分析在心力衰竭临床试验评估和解释中的应用。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Dec;8(12):973-983. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
7
Delayed treatment effects, treatment switching and heterogeneous patient populations: How to design and analyze RCTs in oncology.延迟治疗效果、治疗转换和异质患者人群:如何在肿瘤学中设计和分析 RCT。
Pharm Stat. 2021 Jan;20(1):129-145. doi: 10.1002/pst.2062. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
8
A simulation study comparing the power of nine tests of the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials with a time-to-event outcome.一项模拟研究比较了九种用于评估时间事件结局的随机对照试验中处理效应的检验效能。
Trials. 2020 Apr 6;21(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4153-2.
9
Restricted mean survival time as a summary measure of time-to-event outcome.限制平均生存时间作为时间事件结局的总结衡量指标。
Pharm Stat. 2020 Jul;19(4):436-453. doi: 10.1002/pst.2004. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
10
Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.帕博利珠单抗单药或联合化疗对比西妥昔单抗联合化疗用于治疗复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(KEYNOTE-048):一项随机、开放标签、III 期研究。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 23;394(10212):1915-1928. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32591-7. Epub 2019 Nov 1.