Suppr超能文献

采用三阶段方法解决乌干达口腔暴露前预防措施普及率和连续性方面的差距:混合方法研究。

Applying a Three-Tier Approach to Address Gaps in Oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Uptake and Continuity in Uganda: A Mixed Methods Approach.

机构信息

U.S. Agency for International Development Uganda Health Activity, Kampala, Uganda.

University Research Co., LLC, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Apr 29;12(2). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00229.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We describe a 3-tier approach involving a gap analysis, root cause analysis, and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) collaborative to understand the gap and identify and address the main barriers to oral PrEP uptake and continuity in Uganda.

METHODS

We used a mixed methods design with retrospective, cross-sectional, and prospective components. The gap analysis involved descriptive analysis of PrEP uptake and continuity. The RCA identified the main barriers to initiation and continuity on PrEP among 1,334 clients who declined to start PrEP and 1,266 who missed their appointment but were at risk. The PrEP collaborative tested changes mapped onto specific barriers to optimize the PrEP clinical service delivery. A trend analysis of routinely collected data of the PrEP cascade determined significant shifts and trends in PrEP uptake and continuity.

RESULTS

Only 60% of the high-risk population eligible for PrEP were enrolled, while fewer than 30% of the cumulative number of PrEP users were refilled each quarter. Uncertainty and fear of side effects, perceptions about the harmfulness of the medication, perceived inability to adhere to PrEP, and stigma were the main reasons why clients rejected PrEP. Lack of access to the facility, side effects, pill burden, stigma, perceived low-risk exposure to HIV, and preference of staying at work as opposed to picking up refills affected continuity on PrEP. The collaborative registered statistically significant shifts in PrEP enrollment from 64% to 89% and continuity from 51% to 78% between July 21 and November 22 following the collaborative intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend using a 3-tier approach for other similar implementation contexts to strengthen PrEP programming, given the marked statistical shift in PrEP uptake and continuity. This begins with understanding the gap and barriers to use among clients, followed by mapping interventions to specific barriers through a quality improvement collaborative.

摘要

背景

我们描述了一个涉及差距分析、根本原因分析和暴露前预防 (PrEP) 合作的 3 级方法,以了解差距,并确定和解决乌干达口服 PrEP 使用率和连续性的主要障碍。

方法

我们使用了混合方法设计,包括回顾性、横断面和前瞻性部分。差距分析包括 PrEP 使用率和连续性的描述性分析。根本原因分析确定了 1334 名拒绝开始 PrEP 的患者和 1266 名错过预约但处于风险中的患者中启动和继续 PrEP 的主要障碍。PrEP 合作测试了针对特定障碍的变化,以优化 PrEP 临床服务提供。对 PrEP 级联的常规收集数据进行趋势分析,确定了 PrEP 使用率和连续性的显著变化和趋势。

结果

只有 60%符合 PrEP 条件的高危人群被纳入,而每季度补充的 PrEP 使用者人数不到累计人数的 30%。客户拒绝 PrEP 的主要原因是对副作用的不确定性和恐惧、对药物危害性的看法、认为自己无法坚持服用 PrEP 以及污名化。无法获得设施、副作用、药丸负担、污名化、认为 HIV 暴露风险低以及宁愿工作而不愿取药影响了 PrEP 的连续性。合作干预后,7 月 21 日至 11 月 22 日期间,PrEP 登记人数从 64%增加到 89%,连续性从 51%增加到 78%,这一数字发生了统计学上的显著变化。

结论

鉴于 PrEP 使用率和连续性的显著统计变化,我们建议在其他类似实施环境中使用 3 级方法来加强 PrEP 规划。这从了解客户使用中的差距和障碍开始,然后通过质量改进合作将干预措施映射到具体障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53cb/11057795/7239c0b9a0e8/GH-GHSP240022F001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验