Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5NG, UK.
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2024 Jun;11(2):204-209. doi: 10.1007/s40572-024-00438-7. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
Almost 3 billion people worldwide use solid fuel for cooking and heating. This review examines (i) household energy practices and infrastructures and their influence on fuel usage in different contexts; (ii) barriers in adoption of household clean energy technologies and uses in diverse settings and population groups and (iii) potential air pollution exposure reduction in homes through using processed fuel.
Population health burden from solid fuel combustion-derived particulate air pollution has been estimated in several low- and middle-income countries. However, such studies have not been carried out in high income countries (e.g., UK). Irrespective of the region, fuel prices are the most dominant factor influencing the choice of fuel. Laboratory studies suggest processed fuel - pellets and briquettes - reduce particulate matter emissions by 70-80% and can be a promising alternative. Adoption of clean fuels for domestic energy needs facilitates progress towards five of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). There is evidence that a variety of factors, including cost savings, encourage and hinder such uptake. These factors include price fluctuations, expenses, and the usage of clean fuels. Due to their distinct development scenarios, more expansive policy frameworks, and political economies of energy, these determinants are localized in character and differ significantly amongst economies. Therefore, in order to create innovative plans for the adoption of clean fuel use, strategies centred on local settings must be developed while keeping broad socio-technical and socio-economic issues in mind. Solid fuel processing - pelletization and briquetting - have the potential to reach Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)-like emissions, and could be a potential strategy to mitigate exposure to household air pollution.
全球有近 30 亿人使用固体燃料做饭和取暖。本次审查考察了:(i)家庭能源实践和基础设施及其对不同环境下燃料使用的影响;(ii)在不同环境和人群中采用家庭清洁能源技术和用途的障碍;(iii)通过使用加工燃料减少家庭内的潜在空气污染暴露。
一些中低收入国家已经估算了源自固体燃料燃烧的颗粒物空气污染对人口健康的负担。然而,在高收入国家(如英国)尚未开展此类研究。无论在哪个地区,燃料价格都是影响燃料选择的最主要因素。实验室研究表明,加工燃料——颗粒和压块——可将颗粒物排放量减少 70-80%,是一种很有前景的替代燃料。为满足家庭能源需求而采用清洁能源有助于实现联合国可持续发展目标中的五个目标。有证据表明,包括节省成本在内的多种因素鼓励和阻碍了这种采用,这些因素包括价格波动、费用和清洁能源的使用。由于其独特的发展情况、更广泛的政策框架以及能源方面的政治经济,这些决定因素具有本地化的特点,在不同经济体之间存在显著差异。因此,为了制定采用清洁能源的创新计划,必须制定以当地情况为中心的战略,同时牢记广泛的社会技术和社会经济问题。固体燃料加工——颗粒化和压块化——有可能达到液化石油气(LPG)的排放水平,这可能是减轻家庭空气污染暴露的一种潜在策略。