• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马拉维发放艾滋病毒自检试剂后女性性工作者遭受社会伤害的经历:一项队列研究的结果

Experience of social harms among female sex workers following HIV self-test distribution in Malawi: results of a cohort study.

作者信息

Mee Paul, Neuman Melissa, Kumwenda Moses, Lora Wezzie S, Sikwese Simon, Sambo Mwiza, Fielding Katherine, Indravudh Pitchaya P, Hatzold Karin, Johnson Cheryl, Corbett Elizabeth L, Desmond Nicola

机构信息

Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, College of Health and Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.

Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Mar 11;22(Suppl 1):978. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09178-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-024-09178-3
PMID:38468208
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10926537/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Malawi, female sex workers (FSW) have high HIV incidence and regular testing is suggested. HIV self-testing (HIVST) is a safe and acceptable alternative to standard testing services. This study assessed; whether social harms were more likely to be reported after HIVST distribution to FSW by peer distributors than after facility-based HIV testing and whether FSW regretted HIVST use or experienced associated relationship problems.

METHODS

Peer HIVST distributors, who were FSW, were recruited in Blantyre district, Malawi between February and July 2017. Among HIVST recipients a prospective cohort was recruited. Interviews were conducted at baseline and at end-line, 3 months later. Participants completed daily sexual activity diaries. End-line data were analysed using logistic regression to assess whether regret or relationship problems were associated with HIVST use. Sexual activity data were analysed using Generalised Estimating Equations to assess whether HIVST use was temporally associated with an increase in social harms.

RESULTS

Of 265 FSW recruited and offered HIVST, 131 completed both interviews. Of these, 31/131(23.7%) reported initial regret after HIVST use, this reduced to 23/131(17.6%) at the 3-month follow-up. Relationship problems were reported by 12/131(9.2%). Regret about HIVST use was less commonly reported in those aged 26-35 years compared to those aged 16-25 years (OR immediate regret-0.40 95% CI 0.16-1.01) (OR current regret-0.22 95% CI 0.07 - 0.71) and was not associated with the HIVST result. There was limited evidence that reports of verbal abuse perpetrated by clients in the week following HIVST use were greater than when there was no testing in the preceding week. There was no evidence for increases in any other social harms. There was some evidence of coercion to test, most commonly initiated by the peer distributor.

CONCLUSIONS

Little evidence was found that the peer distribution model was associated with increased levels of social harms, however programmes aimed at reaching FSW need to carefully consider possible unintended consequences of their service delivery approaches, including the potential for peer distributors to coerce individuals to test or disclose their test results and alternative distribution models may need to be considered.

摘要

背景

在马拉维,女性性工作者(FSW)的艾滋病毒感染率很高,建议定期进行检测。艾滋病毒自我检测(HIVST)是标准检测服务的一种安全且可接受的替代方法。本研究评估了:与基于医疗机构的艾滋病毒检测相比,由同伴分发者向女性性工作者分发HIVST后,是否更有可能报告社会危害,以及女性性工作者是否后悔使用HIVST或经历相关的关系问题。

方法

2017年2月至7月期间,在马拉维布兰太尔区招募了身为女性性工作者的同伴HIVST分发者。在HIVST接受者中招募了一个前瞻性队列。在基线和3个月后的终线进行访谈。参与者完成每日性活动日记。使用逻辑回归分析终线数据,以评估后悔或关系问题是否与使用HIVST有关。使用广义估计方程分析性活动数据,以评估使用HIVST是否在时间上与社会危害增加有关。

结果

在招募并提供HIVST的265名女性性工作者中,131人完成了两次访谈。其中,31/131(23.7%)报告在使用HIVST后最初感到后悔,在3个月随访时这一比例降至23/131(17.6%)。12/131(9.2%)报告了关系问题。与16 - 25岁的人相比,26 - 35岁的人较少报告对使用HIVST感到后悔(即时后悔的比值比 - 0.40,95%置信区间0.16 - 1.01)(当前后悔的比值比 - 0.22,95%置信区间0.07 - 0.71),且与HIVST结果无关。仅有有限的证据表明,在使用HIVST后的一周内,客户实施言语虐待的报告比前一周未进行检测时更多。没有证据表明其他任何社会危害有所增加。有一些证据表明存在强制检测的情况,最常见的是由同伴分发者发起。

结论

几乎没有证据表明同伴分发模式与社会危害水平的增加有关,然而,旨在覆盖女性性工作者的项目需要仔细考虑其服务提供方式可能产生的意外后果,包括同伴分发者可能强制个人进行检测或披露检测结果的可能性,可能需要考虑其他分发模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/157f/10926537/a738ec922611/12879_2024_9178_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/157f/10926537/5341719c49dc/12879_2024_9178_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/157f/10926537/a738ec922611/12879_2024_9178_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/157f/10926537/5341719c49dc/12879_2024_9178_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/157f/10926537/a738ec922611/12879_2024_9178_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Experience of social harms among female sex workers following HIV self-test distribution in Malawi: results of a cohort study.马拉维发放艾滋病毒自检试剂后女性性工作者遭受社会伤害的经历:一项队列研究的结果
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Mar 11;22(Suppl 1):978. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09178-3.
2
Understanding how social support influences peer-delivered HIV prevention interventions among Ugandan female sex workers: a case study from HIV self-testing.了解社会支持如何影响乌干达女性性工作者中同伴提供的艾滋病毒预防干预措施:来自艾滋病毒自我检测的案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 3;22(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12836-3.
3
Exploring social harms during distribution of HIV self-testing kits using mixed-methods approaches in Malawi.探讨马拉维使用混合方法在分发 HIV 自我检测工具包过程中产生的社会危害。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Mar;22 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):e25251. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25251.
4
Effect of index HIV self-testing for sexual partners of clients enrolled in antiretroviral therapy (ART) programs in Malawi: A randomized controlled trial.马拉维抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)项目入组患者性伴侣的 HIV 自我检测对艾滋病病毒的影响:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2023 Aug 4;20(8):e1004270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004270. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
HIV self-testing: breaking the barriers to uptake of testing among men and adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa, experiences from STAR demonstration projects in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe.艾滋病毒自检:打破撒哈拉以南非洲地区男男性行为者和青少年接受检测的障碍,来自马拉维、赞比亚和津巴布韦 STAR 示范项目的经验。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Mar;22 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):e25244. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25244.
6
"I wanted evidence that my status had changed, so that is why I tested": experiences with HIV self-testing among female sex workers in Malawi.“我想要我的状况已改变的证据,所以我才进行检测”:马拉维女性性工作者的艾滋病毒自我检测经历
AIDS Care. 2020 May;32(sup2):206-213. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2020.1739212. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
7
Partner-delivered HIV self-test kits with and without financial incentives in antenatal care and index patients with HIV in Malawi: a three-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial.在马拉维的产前护理中,向伴侣发放有无经济激励措施的艾滋病毒自检试剂盒,并向艾滋病毒感染的索引患者发放:一项三臂、整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Jul;9(7):e977-e988. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00175-3.
8
HIV self-testing among female sex workers in Zambia: A cluster randomized controlled trial.赞比亚女性性工作者中的艾滋病毒自我检测:一项整群随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2017 Nov 21;14(11):e1002442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002442. eCollection 2017 Nov.
9
Accuracy of and preferences for blood-based versus oral-fluid-based HIV self-testing in Malawi: a cross-sectional study. Malawi 中基于血液与基于口腔液的 HIV 自我检测的准确性和偏好:一项横断面研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Apr 2;22(Suppl 1):979. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09231-1.
10
Improving ART initiation among men who use HIV self-testing in Malawi: a qualitative study.提高马拉维使用 HIV 自我检测的男性接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的比例:一项定性研究。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2022 Jun;25(6):e25950. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25950.

引用本文的文献

1
HIV self-testing - the path from an innovation to a necessity.HIV自我检测——从一项创新到一种必需的历程。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 21;25(1):930. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11272-z.
2
Reaching priority populations with different HIV self-testing distribution models in South Africa: an analysis of programme data.在南非通过不同的艾滋病毒自我检测分发模式覆盖重点人群:项目数据分析
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 25;22(Suppl 1):981. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10662-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in knowledge of HIV status and efficiency of HIV testing services in sub-Saharan Africa, 2000-20: a modelling study using survey and HIV testing programme data.撒哈拉以南非洲地区 HIV 知晓率和 HIV 检测服务效率的趋势变化:基于调查和 HIV 检测项目数据的建模研究。
Lancet HIV. 2021 May;8(5):e284-e293. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30315-5. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
2
Comparing the effects of HIV self-testing to standard HIV testing for key populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较 HIV 自我检测与标准 HIV 检测对关键人群的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Dec 3;18(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01835-z.
3
"I wanted evidence that my status had changed, so that is why I tested": experiences with HIV self-testing among female sex workers in Malawi.
“我想要我的状况已改变的证据,所以我才进行检测”:马拉维女性性工作者的艾滋病毒自我检测经历
AIDS Care. 2020 May;32(sup2):206-213. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2020.1739212. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
4
HIV self-testing services for female sex workers, Malawi and Zimbabwe.HIV 自我检测服务在马拉维和津巴布韦的性工作者中的应用。
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Nov 1;97(11):764-776. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.223560. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
5
Strategies to promote the meaningful involvement of sex workers in HIV prevention and care.促进性工作者有意义地参与艾滋病毒预防和护理的策略。
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2019 Sep;14(5):401-408. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000562.
6
Exploring social harms during distribution of HIV self-testing kits using mixed-methods approaches in Malawi.探讨马拉维使用混合方法在分发 HIV 自我检测工具包过程中产生的社会危害。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Mar;22 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):e25251. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25251.
7
The Effect of HIV Self-Testing Delivery Models on Female Sex Workers' Sexual Behaviors: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Urban Uganda.HIV 自我检测交付模式对性工作者性行为的影响:乌干达城市地区的一项随机对照试验。
AIDS Behav. 2019 May;23(5):1225-1239. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02393-z.
8
Measuring sexual behaviour in Malawi: a triangulation of three data collection instruments.马拉维性行为测量:三种数据收集工具的三角测量。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):807. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5717-x.
9
Effect of HIV self-testing on the number of sexual partners among female sex workers in Zambia.赞比亚 HIV 自检对性工作者性伴侣数量的影响。
AIDS. 2018 Mar 13;32(5):645-652. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001740.
10
HIV Testing and Counseling Among Female Sex Workers: A Systematic Literature Review.HIV 检测与咨询服务在女性性工作者中的应用:一项系统性文献回顾。
AIDS Behav. 2018 Aug;22(8):2435-2457. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-2043-3.