Suppr超能文献

一项针对年轻患者深部脑刺激和迷走神经刺激的回顾性、自然主义研究。

A retrospective, naturalistic study of deep brain stimulation and vagal nerve stimulation in young patients.

作者信息

Yuruk Deniz, Ozger Can, Garzon Juan F, Nakonezny Paul A, Vande Voort Jennifer L, Croarkin Paul E

机构信息

Research Fellow in the Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic Children's Research Center, and Mayo Clinic Depression Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2024 Mar;14(3):e3452. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3452.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Invasive neuromodulation interventions such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) are important treatments for movement disorders and epilepsy, but literature focused on young patients treated with DBS and VNS is limited. This retrospective study aimed to examine naturalistic outcomes of VNS and DBS treatment of epilepsy and dystonia in children, adolescents, and young adults.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed patient demographic and outcome data that were obtained from electronic health records. Two researchers used the Clinical Global Impression scale to retrospectively rate the severity of neurologic and psychiatric symptoms before and after patients underwent surgery to implant DBS electrodes or a VNS device. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to examine clinical effects.

RESULTS

Data from 73 patients were evaluated. Neurologic symptoms improved for patients treated with DBS and VNS (p < .001). Patients treated with DBS did not have a change in psychiatric symptoms, whereas psychiatric symptoms worsened for patients treated with VNS (p = .008). The frequency of postoperative complications did not differ between VNS and DBS groups.

CONCLUSION

Young patients may have distinct vulnerabilities for increased psychiatric symptoms during treatment with invasive neuromodulation. Child and adolescent psychiatrists should consider a more proactive approach and greater engagement with DBS and VNS teams that treat younger patients.

摘要

引言

侵入性神经调节干预措施,如深部脑刺激(DBS)和迷走神经刺激(VNS),是治疗运动障碍和癫痫的重要方法,但专注于接受DBS和VNS治疗的年轻患者的文献有限。这项回顾性研究旨在探讨VNS和DBS治疗儿童、青少年和年轻成人癫痫和肌张力障碍的实际疗效。

方法

我们回顾性评估了从电子健康记录中获取的患者人口统计学和疗效数据。两名研究人员使用临床总体印象量表,对患者植入DBS电极或VNS设备手术前后的神经和精神症状严重程度进行回顾性评分。采用描述性和推断性统计方法来检验临床效果。

结果

对73例患者的数据进行了评估。接受DBS和VNS治疗的患者神经症状均有改善(p <.001)。接受DBS治疗的患者精神症状没有变化,而接受VNS治疗的患者精神症状恶化(p =.008)。VNS组和DBS组术后并发症的发生率没有差异。

结论

年轻患者在接受侵入性神经调节治疗期间,可能更容易出现精神症状加重的情况。儿童和青少年精神科医生应考虑采取更积极主动的方法,并更多地参与到治疗年轻患者的DBS和VNS团队中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a09e/10928335/d01229526ae7/BRB3-14-e3452-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验