Suppr超能文献

抗药性癫痫患者的神经刺激:国际抗癫痫联盟外科治疗委员会的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Neurostimulation in people with drug-resistant epilepsy: Systematic review and meta-analysis from the ILAE Surgical Therapies Commission.

机构信息

Research Centre of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Department of Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2022 Jun;63(6):1314-1329. doi: 10.1111/epi.17243. Epub 2022 Apr 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Summarize the current evidence on efficacy and tolerability of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting standards and searched Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and their corresponding open-label extension studies, as well as prospective case series, with ≥20 participants (excluding studies limited to children). Our primary outcome was the mean (or median, when unavailable) percentage decrease in frequency, as compared to baseline, of all epileptic seizures at last follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of treatment responders and proportion with seizure freedom.

RESULTS

We identified 30 eligible studies, six of which were RCTs. At long-term follow-up (mean 1.3 years), five observational studies for VNS reported a pooled mean percentage decrease in seizure frequency of 34.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.1, 74.5). In the open-label extension studies for RNS, the median seizure reduction was 53%, 66%, and 75% at 2, 5, and 9 years of follow-up, respectively. For DBS, the median reduction was 56%, 65%, and 75% at 2, 5, and 7 years, respectively. The proportion of individuals with seizure freedom at last follow-up increased significantly over time for DBS and RNS, whereas a positive trend was observed for VNS. Quality of life was improved in all modalities. The most common complications included hoarseness, and cough and throat pain for VNS and implant site pain, headache, and dysesthesia for DBS and RNS.

SIGNIFICANCE

Neurostimulation modalities are an effective treatment option for drug-resistant epilepsy, with improving outcomes over time and few major complications. Seizure-reduction rates among the three therapies were similar during the initial blinded phase. Recent long-term follow-up studies are encouraging for RNS and DBS but are lacking for VNS.

摘要

目的

通过系统评价和荟萃分析总结迷走神经刺激(VNS)、反应性神经刺激(RNS)和深部脑刺激(DBS)的疗效和耐受性的现有证据。

方法

我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告标准的首选报告项目,检索了 Ovid Medline、Ovid Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库。我们纳入了已发表的随机对照试验(RCT)及其相应的开放标签扩展研究,以及有≥20 名参与者的前瞻性病例系列研究(不包括仅限于儿童的研究)。我们的主要结局是最后一次随访时与基线相比,所有癫痫发作频率的平均(或中位数,无中位数时)下降百分比。次要结局包括治疗应答者的比例和无发作的比例。

结果

我们确定了 30 项符合条件的研究,其中 6 项为 RCT。在长期随访(平均 1.3 年)中,五项 VNS 的观察性研究报告的集合同期发作频率平均下降 34.7%(95%置信区间[CI]:-5.1,74.5)。在 RNS 的开放标签扩展研究中,分别在 2、5 和 9 年的随访时,中位数的癫痫发作减少率分别为 53%、66%和 75%。对于 DBS,中位数减少率分别为 56%、65%和 75%,分别在 2、5 和 7 年时。在最后一次随访时,无发作的个体比例随着时间的推移显著增加,DBS 和 RNS 也是如此,而 VNS 则出现了积极的趋势。所有模式的生活质量均有所改善。最常见的并发症包括 VNS 的声音嘶哑、咳嗽和喉咙痛,以及 DBS 和 RNS 的植入部位疼痛、头痛和感觉异常。

意义

神经刺激疗法是耐药性癫痫的有效治疗选择,随着时间的推移,疗效逐渐改善,且并发症较少。三种治疗方法在初始盲法阶段的发作减少率相似。最近的长期随访研究对 RNS 和 DBS 较为乐观,但 VNS 则缺乏相关研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验