Suppr超能文献

不同水泥空间对两种扫描和铣削设备组合构建的二硅酸锂全瓷冠边缘间隙的影响。

The influence of different cement spaces on the marginal gap of lithium disilicate crowns constructed by two scanner and milling unit combinations.

机构信息

Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Dent J. 2024 Sep;69(3):189-196. doi: 10.1111/adj.13014. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compared the marginal gaps of CAD/CAM lithium disilicate (LDS) crowns constructed using a contemporary and older scanner/milling unit combination at three different cement spaces.

METHODS

Twenty-four undergraduate students prepared a Columbia model lower left first molar for an LDS crown in a simulated environment. From each crown preparation, one LDS crown was constructed using an E4D scanner/E4D milling unit (E4DS/E4DM) and TRIOS 3 scanner/Sirona inLab MC X5 milling unit (TRIO/MCX5) at cement space settings of 50, 100 and 200 μm. Each LDS crown was positioned onto the original crown preparation, and then a stereomicroscope was used to make three vertical marginal gap measurements at four locations (mid-buccal, mid-lingual, mid-mesial and mid-distal). The mean marginal gap (MMG) was calculated for each crown and each individual tooth surface.

RESULTS

The MMGs of CAD/CAM LDS crowns constructed by TRIO/MCX5 were 72.31 at 50, 63.73 at 100 μm and 46.23 μm at 200 μm, which were smaller than E4DS/E4DM at each cement space.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the cement space decreased the MMG in both scanner/milling unit combinations. The smallest MMG was found using the newer scanner/milling unit at the 200 μm cement space. © 2024 Australian Dental Association.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了在三种不同的粘结间隙下,使用现代和较老的扫描/铣削设备组合制作 CAD/CAM 锂硅玻璃陶瓷(LDS)冠的边缘间隙。

方法

24 名本科生在模拟环境中为哥伦比亚模型左下第一磨牙制备 LDS 冠。从每个冠预备体中,使用 E4D 扫描仪/E4D 铣削单元(E4DS/E4DM)和 TRIOS 3 扫描仪/Sirona inLab MC X5 铣削单元(TRIO/MCX5),在粘结间隙设置为 50、100 和 200 μm 的情况下分别制作一个 LDS 冠。将每个 LDS 冠放置在原始冠预备体上,然后使用立体显微镜在四个位置(颊中、舌中、近中、远中)进行三个垂直边缘间隙测量。为每个冠和每个个体牙面计算平均边缘间隙(MMG)。

结果

TRIO/MCX5 制作的 CAD/CAM LDS 冠的 MMG 在 50 μm 时为 72.31 μm,在 100 μm 时为 63.73 μm,在 200 μm 时为 46.23 μm,在每个粘结间隙处均小于 E4DS/E4DM。

结论

增加粘结间隙会减小两种扫描/铣削设备组合的 MMG。在 200 μm 的粘结间隙下,使用较新的扫描/铣削单元可获得最小的 MMG。 © 2024 澳大利亚牙科协会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验