• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同水泥空间对两种扫描和铣削设备组合构建的二硅酸锂全瓷冠边缘间隙的影响。

The influence of different cement spaces on the marginal gap of lithium disilicate crowns constructed by two scanner and milling unit combinations.

机构信息

Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Dent J. 2024 Sep;69(3):189-196. doi: 10.1111/adj.13014. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1111/adj.13014
PMID:38469907
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compared the marginal gaps of CAD/CAM lithium disilicate (LDS) crowns constructed using a contemporary and older scanner/milling unit combination at three different cement spaces.

METHODS

Twenty-four undergraduate students prepared a Columbia model lower left first molar for an LDS crown in a simulated environment. From each crown preparation, one LDS crown was constructed using an E4D scanner/E4D milling unit (E4DS/E4DM) and TRIOS 3 scanner/Sirona inLab MC X5 milling unit (TRIO/MCX5) at cement space settings of 50, 100 and 200 μm. Each LDS crown was positioned onto the original crown preparation, and then a stereomicroscope was used to make three vertical marginal gap measurements at four locations (mid-buccal, mid-lingual, mid-mesial and mid-distal). The mean marginal gap (MMG) was calculated for each crown and each individual tooth surface.

RESULTS

The MMGs of CAD/CAM LDS crowns constructed by TRIO/MCX5 were 72.31 at 50, 63.73 at 100 μm and 46.23 μm at 200 μm, which were smaller than E4DS/E4DM at each cement space.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the cement space decreased the MMG in both scanner/milling unit combinations. The smallest MMG was found using the newer scanner/milling unit at the 200 μm cement space. © 2024 Australian Dental Association.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了在三种不同的粘结间隙下,使用现代和较老的扫描/铣削设备组合制作 CAD/CAM 锂硅玻璃陶瓷(LDS)冠的边缘间隙。

方法

24 名本科生在模拟环境中为哥伦比亚模型左下第一磨牙制备 LDS 冠。从每个冠预备体中,使用 E4D 扫描仪/E4D 铣削单元(E4DS/E4DM)和 TRIOS 3 扫描仪/Sirona inLab MC X5 铣削单元(TRIO/MCX5),在粘结间隙设置为 50、100 和 200 μm 的情况下分别制作一个 LDS 冠。将每个 LDS 冠放置在原始冠预备体上,然后使用立体显微镜在四个位置(颊中、舌中、近中、远中)进行三个垂直边缘间隙测量。为每个冠和每个个体牙面计算平均边缘间隙(MMG)。

结果

TRIO/MCX5 制作的 CAD/CAM LDS 冠的 MMG 在 50 μm 时为 72.31 μm,在 100 μm 时为 63.73 μm,在 200 μm 时为 46.23 μm,在每个粘结间隙处均小于 E4DS/E4DM。

结论

增加粘结间隙会减小两种扫描/铣削设备组合的 MMG。在 200 μm 的粘结间隙下,使用较新的扫描/铣削单元可获得最小的 MMG。 © 2024 澳大利亚牙科协会。

相似文献

1
The influence of different cement spaces on the marginal gap of lithium disilicate crowns constructed by two scanner and milling unit combinations.不同水泥空间对两种扫描和铣削设备组合构建的二硅酸锂全瓷冠边缘间隙的影响。
Aust Dent J. 2024 Sep;69(3):189-196. doi: 10.1111/adj.13014. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
2
The marginal gaps of lithium disilicate crowns constructed by different scanner and milling unit combinations.不同扫描设备和加工设备组合构建的二硅酸锂瓷冠边缘间隙。
Aust Dent J. 2022 Jun;67(2):125-131. doi: 10.1111/adj.12891. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
3
The marginal gaps of sequentially milled lithium disilicate crowns using two different milling units.使用两种不同铣削单元连续铣削的二硅酸锂冠的边缘间隙。
Aust Dent J. 2022 Sep;67(3):239-248. doi: 10.1111/adj.12909. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
4
The influence of different cement spaces on the marginal gap of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns.不同粘结空间对 CAD/CAM 全瓷冠边缘间隙的影响。
Aust Dent J. 2019 Jun;64(2):167-174. doi: 10.1111/adj.12688. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
5
A comparison of the marginal gaps of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by two different intraoral scanners.两种不同口内扫描仪制作的二硅酸锂全瓷冠边缘适合性的比较。
Aust Dent J. 2020 Jun;65(2):150-157. doi: 10.1111/adj.12748. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
6
[Fitness of onlays fabricated with direct and indirect CAD/CAM technology ].[采用直接和间接计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造技术制作的嵌体的适合性]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Jun 18;57(3):604-609. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.03.027.
7
Accuracy of CAD-CAM milling versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.CAD-CAM 铣削与传统失蜡铸造在单金属冠修复体中的精度比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Jul;132(1):51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.018. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
8
Verification of a digital approach for three-dimensional evaluation of marginal and internal fit.一种用于边缘和内部适合性三维评估的数字方法的验证。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jul;134(1):160-166. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
9
Influence of luting space settings and polymerization-induced cement shrinkage and deformation/adaptation of CAD/CAM crowns.粘接间隙设置、聚合诱导的水泥收缩以及CAD/CAM牙冠的变形/适配的影响
Braz Oral Res. 2025 Jul 7;39:e074. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.074. eCollection 2025.
10
Comparative evaluation of marginal fit accuracy of two different designs of endocrown manufactured through CAD-CAM system: An in vitro study.通过计算机辅助设计与制造(CAD-CAM)系统制作的两种不同设计的嵌体冠边缘适合性精度的比较评估:一项体外研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2025 Jan 1;25(1):74-79. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_207_24. Epub 2025 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring the Marginal Gap of Pre-Cemented All-Metal Single Crowns: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.测量预粘结全金属单冠的边缘间隙:体外研究的系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2025 May 2;13(5):204. doi: 10.3390/dj13050204.
2
Marginal Gap of Pre-Cemented Endocrowns: A Systematic Review of Measurement Methods and the Influence of Fabrication Method and Crown Material.预粘结内冠的边缘间隙:测量方法以及制作方法和冠材料影响的系统评价
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Jun;11(3):e70152. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70152.