Reeb Roger N, Elvers Greg, Hunt Charles A, Turner Tia N, Ballas Thomas N, Farmer Christine N, Gibbins Katey, Glendening Zachary S, Kinsey Rebecca, Latuch Bernadette D, Parker Chelsey N, Snow-Hill Nyssa L, Zicka Jennifer L, Bohardt David, Andrews Robert
Department of Psychology, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH, USA.
St. Vincent de Paul, Dayton, OH, USA.
J Prev Interv Community. 2024 Jan-Mar;52(1):173-197. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2024.2317671. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
The article reports empirical outcomes of an ongoing transdisciplinary participatory community action research project that implements behavioral activation in homeless shelters. The overall goal of this Project is twofold: (1) to improve psychosocial functioning of shelter residents and enhance their opportunities to overcome homelessness; and (2) to enhance civic development of service-learning students who assist in Project implementation. Two studies are reported, representing these goals. Study 1 found that residents of a men's shelter (n = 892), women's shelter (n = 433), and transitional housing (n = 40) perceived behavioral activation sessions as immediately beneficial (i.e., important, meaningful, worthy of repeating, and enjoyable), and over the course of shelter stay, they perceived behavioral activation as contributing to their hope, empowerment/self-sufficiency, quality of life, purpose/meaning in life, wellbeing, social support, shelter social climate, and relationships with staff. Quantitative findings are supported by qualitative data (comments by residents on forms). Study 2, which replicates and extends past research on civic-development in service-learning students, used a new quasi-experimental design to compare service-learning students (n = 41) in an interdisciplinary course on homelessness versus non-service-learning students (n = 16) in a psychology course. Service-learning students showed pre- to post-semester improvements in community service self-efficacy, decreases in stigmatizing attitudes, and increases in awareness of privilege and oppression, but students not engaged in service-learning did not show these civic-related changes. These quantitative results are supported by qualitative data (written reflections by students). Results and implications are discussed within the context of the concept of psychopolitical validity.
本文报道了一个正在进行的跨学科参与式社区行动研究项目的实证结果,该项目在无家可归者收容所实施行为激活疗法。该项目的总体目标有两个:(1)改善收容所居民的心理社会功能,增加他们克服无家可归状况的机会;(2)促进参与项目实施的服务学习学生的公民发展。文中报告了两项研究,分别代表这两个目标。研究1发现,男性收容所(n = 892)、女性收容所(n = 433)和过渡性住房(n = 40)的居民认为行为激活疗法能带来即时益处(即重要、有意义、值得重复且令人愉快),并且在收容所居住期间,他们认为行为激活疗法有助于提升希望、增强权能/自给自足能力、提高生活质量、赋予生活目标/意义、改善幸福感、获得社会支持、营造收容所社会氛围以及改善与工作人员的关系。定量研究结果得到了定性数据(居民在表格上的评论)的支持。研究2重复并扩展了以往关于服务学习学生公民发展的研究,采用了一种新的准实验设计,比较了一门关于无家可归问题的跨学科课程中的服务学习学生(n = 41)和一门心理学课程中的非服务学习学生(n = 16)。服务学习学生在学期前后社区服务自我效能感有所提高,污名化态度有所减少,对特权和压迫的认识有所增加,但未参与服务学习的学生未出现这些与公民发展相关的变化。这些定量研究结果得到了定性数据(学生的书面反思)的支持。研究结果及其意义将在心理政治效度概念的背景下进行讨论。