• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斯洛文尼亚语版《护理中技术能力感知量表》的心理测量测试

Psychometric Testing of the Slovene Version of the Perceived Inventory of Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing.

作者信息

Krel Cvetka, Vrbnjak Dominika, Štiglic Gregor, Bevc Sebastjan

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, University Clinical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 28;12(5):561. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12050561.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare12050561
PMID:38470672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10930641/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The Perceived Inventory of Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing (PITCCN) questionnaire has been designed to measure technological competency as caring in nursing practice. It incorporates the use of technology with the fundamental principles of caring that are central to nursing. As there were no psychometrically sound instruments to quantify the concept of technological competency as caring in the Slovene language, we adapted the English version of the questionnaire to the local environment. The goal was to assess the level of psychometric properties of the PITCCN investigated in Slovene hospitals.

METHODS

Content validity was conducted with eight experts and quantified by the content validity index (CVI) and the modified Cohen's kappa index. Face validity was assessed through discussions with participants from the target culture in the pilot study. To assess construct validity and internal consistency, a cross-sectional research methodology was used on a convenience sample of 121 nursing personnel from four hospitals. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to examine construct validity, while Cronbach's alpha and adjusted item-total correlations were used to measure internal consistency.

RESULTS

The content and face validity of PITCCN were adequate. The scale validity index (S-CVI) was 0.97. Cronbach's α was 0.92, and subscale reliabilities ranged from 0.810 to 0.925. PCA showed four components, which explained more than 73.49% of the variance.

CONCLUSIONS

The Slovenian version of PITCCN (PITCCN_SI) has good psychometric properties.

摘要

未标注

《护理中作为关怀的技术能力感知量表》(PITCCN)问卷旨在衡量护理实践中作为关怀的技术能力。它将技术的使用与护理核心的关怀基本原则相结合。由于斯洛文尼亚语中没有从心理测量学角度衡量作为关怀的技术能力这一概念的有效工具,我们将该问卷的英文版本进行了本地化改编。目的是评估在斯洛文尼亚医院中调查的PITCCN的心理测量特性水平。

方法

八位专家进行了内容效度评估,并通过内容效度指数(CVI)和修正的科恩kappa指数进行量化。在预试验中,通过与目标文化的参与者进行讨论来评估表面效度。为了评估结构效度和内部一致性,对来自四家医院的121名护理人员的便利样本采用了横断面研究方法。主成分分析(PCA)用于检验结构效度,而克朗巴赫α系数和调整后的项目-总分相关性用于衡量内部一致性。

结果

PITCCN的内容效度和表面效度良好。量表效度指数(S-CVI)为0.97。克朗巴赫α系数为0.92,各子量表的信度在0.810至0.925之间。主成分分析显示有四个成分,解释了超过73.49%的方差。

结论

斯洛文尼亚语版的PITCCN(PITCCN_SI)具有良好的心理测量特性。

相似文献

1
Psychometric Testing of the Slovene Version of the Perceived Inventory of Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing.斯洛文尼亚语版《护理中技术能力感知量表》的心理测量测试
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 28;12(5):561. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12050561.
2
Content validity, face validity and internal consistency of the Slovene version of Caring Factor Survey for care providers, caring for co-workers and caring of managers.针对护理人员、照顾同事及管理人员的斯洛文尼亚语版关怀因素调查问卷的内容效度、表面效度和内部一致性。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2017 Jun;31(2):395-404. doi: 10.1111/scs.12338. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
3
Criterion-related Validity of the Perceived Inventory of Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing (PITCCN) in Acute Care Settings.急性护理环境中护理技术能力感知量表(PITCCN)的效标关联效度。
J Med Invest. 2019;66(1.2):42-45. doi: 10.2152/jmi.66.42.
4
Psychometric testing of the Slovenian Person-centred Climate Questionnaire - staff version.斯洛文尼亚以人为本的气候问卷(员工版)的心理测量测试。
J Nurs Manag. 2017 Sep;25(6):421-429. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12479. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
5
Psychometric performance of the English language six-item Caring Behaviours Inventory in an acute care context.英语六项关爱行为量表在急性护理环境中的心理测量性能。
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Sep;24(17-18):2538-44. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12849. Epub 2015 May 11.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Greek Version of the Caring Behaviors Inventory-16.关怀行为量表-16希腊语版本的心理测量特性
Cureus. 2021 May 23;13(5):e15186. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15186.
7
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
8
Caring Behaviors Inventory-24: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric testing for using in nurses and patients.关怀行为量表-24:护士和患者使用的翻译、跨文化调适及心理测量测试
BMC Nurs. 2023 Mar 24;22(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01248-2.
9
Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the Problems and Needs in Palliative Care questionnaire-short version in advanced cancer patients.中文版晚期癌症患者舒缓护理问题和需求问卷简表的心理计量学评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Aug 6;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0450-5.
10
Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Technological Competencyas Caring in Nursing Instrument.《护理技术能力关爱量表西班牙语版的效度与信度》
Invest Educ Enferm. 2017 May;35(2):154-164. doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v35n2a04.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring Acute Pancreatitis Clinical Pathways Using a Novel Process Mining Method.使用一种新型过程挖掘方法探索急性胰腺炎临床路径
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 13;11(18):2529. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182529.
2
Factors in integrating academic electronic medical records in nursing curricula: A qualitative multiple case studies approach.护理课程中整合学术电子病历的因素:一种定性多案例研究方法。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Jan;120:105626. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105626. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
3
Nursing knowledge captured in electronic health records.电子健康记录中所记录的护理知识。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2023 Jan;34(1):72-84. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12365. Epub 2022 May 15.
4
Structural validity and reliability of the return to work assessment scale among post stroke survivors.脑卒中幸存者工作恢复评估量表的结构效度和信度。
Work. 2021;69(3):969-979. doi: 10.3233/WOR-213528.
5
The impact on health outcomes of implementing electronic health records to support the care of older people in residential aged care: A scoping review.实施电子健康记录以支持老年人在养老院中的护理对健康结果的影响:范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jul;151:104471. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104471. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
6
Issues and recommendations for exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis.探索性因子分析和主成分分析的问题与建议。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 May;17(5):1004-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.027. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
7
Can nurses remain relevant in a technologically advanced future?在技术高度发达的未来,护士还会具有重要意义吗?
Int J Nurs Sci. 2018 Oct 4;6(1):106-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.09.013. eCollection 2019 Jan 10.
8
Reconceptualizing the Electronic Health Record for a New Decade: A Caring Technology?为新十年重新构想电子健康记录:一种关怀技术?
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2019 Jul/Sep;42(3):193-205. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000282.
9
Criterion-related Validity of the Perceived Inventory of Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing (PITCCN) in Acute Care Settings.急性护理环境中护理技术能力感知量表(PITCCN)的效标关联效度。
J Med Invest. 2019;66(1.2):42-45. doi: 10.2152/jmi.66.42.
10
Usefulness of nursing theory-guided practice: an integrative review.护理理论指导实践的效用:一项综合综述。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2019 Sep;33(3):540-555. doi: 10.1111/scs.12670. Epub 2019 Mar 13.