EVALUATION OF PRONE VERSUS SUPINE POSITIONING IN FRESH RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT TREATED WITH PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY AND GAS.

PURPOSE

To compare Supine versus Prone positioning in fresh rhegmatogenous retinal detachments treated with vitrectomy and gas tamponade.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized controlled trial of 72 eyes with fresh rhegmatogenous retinal detachment that underwent 25-gauge vitrectomy: 37 eyes were allotted supine position and 35 were allotted prone position. Cases were evaluated for single-surgery reattachment rates, best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, cataract formation, and any complications. The patients were followed up for a period of 3 months.

RESULTS

Both groups had similar demographics, and no significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of extent of retinal detachment, position, and number of breaks. The anatomical success after single surgery was 97.3% in the Supine group and 94.3% in the Prone group ( P = 0.609). The best-corrected visual acuity at the end of 3 months was 0.44 ± 0.27 in the Supine group and 0.35 ± 0.27 in the Prone group ( P = 0.119) with a significant increase in best-corrected visual acuity preoperatively from 0.11 ± 0.22 and 0.13 ± 0.22 in Supine and Prone groups, respectively ( P = <0.001). The intraocular pressure in the two groups was comparable at each follow-up. The rates of cataract formation were also similar in the two groups-60% and 53.8% in Supine and Prone groups, respectively ( P = 1.00). Complications such as spikes in intraocular pressure, epiretinal membrane formation, and cystoid macular edema were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Rates of retinal reattachment were comparable in both groups showing that supine position is equally safe and effective for adequate tamponade.