• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类注视行为的个体差异可以从面部扩展到物体。

Individual differences in human gaze behavior generalize from faces to objects.

机构信息

Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen 35394, Germany.

Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, Universities of Marburg, Giessen, and Darmstadt, Marburg 35032, Germany.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 19;121(12):e2322149121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322149121. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2322149121
PMID:38470925
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10963009/
Abstract

Individuals differ in where they fixate on a face, with some looking closer to the eyes while others prefer the mouth region. These individual biases are highly robust, generalize from the lab to the outside world, and have been associated with social cognition and associated disorders. However, it is unclear, whether these biases are specific to faces or influenced by domain-general mechanisms of vision. Here, we juxtaposed these hypotheses by testing whether individual face fixation biases generalize to inanimate objects. We analyzed >1.8 million fixations toward faces and objects in complex natural scenes from 405 participants tested in multiple labs. Consistent interindividual differences in fixation positions were highly inter-correlated across faces and objects in all samples. Observers who fixated closer to the eye region also fixated higher on inanimate objects and vice versa. Furthermore, the inter-individual spread of fixation positions scaled with target size in precisely the same, non-linear manner for faces and objects. These findings contradict a purely domain-specific account of individual face gaze. Instead, they suggest significant domain-general contributions to the individual way we look at faces, a finding with potential relevance for basic vision, face perception, social cognition, and associated clinical conditions.

摘要

个体在注视人脸时的位置存在差异,一些人更喜欢注视眼睛附近,而另一些人则更喜欢注视嘴巴区域。这些个体偏差非常稳定,不仅在实验室中存在,在现实世界中也同样存在,并且与社会认知和相关障碍有关。然而,目前尚不清楚这些偏差是特定于面部还是受到视觉的非特定领域机制的影响。在这里,我们通过测试个体对面部的注视偏差是否会推广到无生命物体来检验这些假设。我们分析了来自 405 名参与者在多个实验室中测试的超过 180 万次对人脸和物体的注视,发现了一致的个体间差异。在所有样本中,人脸和物体的注视位置之间存在高度的个体间相关性。那些更靠近眼睛区域注视的观察者也会更多地注视无生命物体,反之亦然。此外,注视位置的个体间差异与目标大小呈精确的非线性关系,这在人脸和物体中都是如此。这些发现与个体面部注视的纯粹特定领域解释相矛盾。相反,它们表明个体对面部的观察方式存在显著的非特定领域贡献,这一发现可能与基本视觉、面部感知、社会认知和相关临床状况有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3cc/10963009/96acd1eb98f8/pnas.2322149121fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3cc/10963009/2ccac67cf32f/pnas.2322149121fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3cc/10963009/e241f8be8f20/pnas.2322149121fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3cc/10963009/96acd1eb98f8/pnas.2322149121fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3cc/10963009/2ccac67cf32f/pnas.2322149121fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3cc/10963009/e241f8be8f20/pnas.2322149121fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3cc/10963009/96acd1eb98f8/pnas.2322149121fig03.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual differences in human gaze behavior generalize from faces to objects.人类注视行为的个体差异可以从面部扩展到物体。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 19;121(12):e2322149121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322149121. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
2
Characteristic fixation biases in Super-Recognizers.超级识别者的特征固视偏差。
J Vis. 2022 Jul 11;22(8):17. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.8.17.
3
Individual differences in face-looking behavior generalize from the lab to the world.面部注视行为的个体差异从实验室推广到了现实世界。
J Vis. 2016 May 1;16(7):12. doi: 10.1167/16.7.12.
4
Individual differences in face salience and rapid face saccades.面孔显著性和快速面孔扫视的个体差异。
J Vis. 2024 Jun 3;24(6):16. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.6.16.
5
The robustness of individual differences in gaze preferences toward faces and eyes across face-to-face experimental designs and its relation to social anxiety.个体在面对面实验设计中对视和眼神的偏好差异的稳健性及其与社交焦虑的关系。
J Vis. 2023 May 2;23(5):15. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.5.15.
6
Eye spy a liar: assessing the utility of eye fixations and confidence judgments for detecting concealed recognition of faces, scenes and objects.眼侦探谎:评估眼动和自信判断在检测隐藏的面孔、场景和物体识别中的效用。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Aug 14;5(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00227-4.
7
A model that adopts human fixations explains individual differences in multiple object tracking.采用人类注视点的模型解释了在多项物体追踪中个体差异的原因。
Cognition. 2020 Dec;205:104418. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104418. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
8
The Upper Eye Bias: Rotated Faces Draw Fixations to the Upper Eye.上眼偏差:旋转的面部会将注视吸引到上眼部位。
Perception. 2019 Feb;48(2):162-174. doi: 10.1177/0301006618819628. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
9
Individual differences in looking at persons in scenes.个体差异与场景中的人物观察
J Vis. 2022 Nov 1;22(12):9. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.12.9.
10
Individual differences in eye movements during face identification reflect observer-specific optimal points of fixation.个体在面孔识别过程中的眼动差异反映了观察者特定的最佳注视点。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1216-25. doi: 10.1177/0956797612471684. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced and idiosyncratic neural representations of personally typical scenes.个人典型场景的增强型和特质性神经表征。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Mar;292(2043):20250272. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.0272. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
2
Individual gaze predicts individual scene descriptions.个体注视可预测个体对场景的描述。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 19;15(1):9443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94056-4.
3
Visuospatial computations vary by category and stream and continue to develop in adolescence.视觉空间计算因类别和脑区信息流而异,并在青春期持续发展。

本文引用的文献

1
The robustness of individual differences in gaze preferences toward faces and eyes across face-to-face experimental designs and its relation to social anxiety.个体在面对面实验设计中对视和眼神的偏好差异的稳健性及其与社交焦虑的关系。
J Vis. 2023 May 2;23(5):15. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.5.15.
2
Polar angle asymmetries in visual perception and neural architecture.视觉感知和神经结构中的极角不对称性。
Trends Neurosci. 2023 Jun;46(6):445-458. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
3
Individual fixation tendencies in person viewing generalize from images to videos.
bioRxiv. 2025 Jan 14:2025.01.14.633067. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.14.633067.
4
Individual gaze shapes diverging neural representations.个体注视方式塑造了不同的神经表征。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 3;121(36):e2405602121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2405602121. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
5
Individual differences in face salience and rapid face saccades.面孔显著性和快速面孔扫视的个体差异。
J Vis. 2024 Jun 3;24(6):16. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.6.16.
6
Oculomotor routines for perceptual judgments.用于知觉判断的眼球运动常规。
J Vis. 2024 May 1;24(5):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.5.3.
在人物观看中的个体注视倾向从图像推广到视频。
Iperception. 2022 Nov 4;13(6):20416695221128844. doi: 10.1177/20416695221128844. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
4
Individual differences in looking at persons in scenes.个体差异与场景中的人物观察
J Vis. 2022 Nov 1;22(12):9. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.12.9.
5
Characteristic fixation biases in Super-Recognizers.超级识别者的特征固视偏差。
J Vis. 2022 Jul 11;22(8):17. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.8.17.
6
Linking individual differences in human primary visual cortex to contrast sensitivity around the visual field.将人类初级视觉皮层的个体差异与视野周围的对比敏感度联系起来。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 13;13(1):3309. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31041-9.
7
Inferior Occipital Gyrus Is Organized along Common Gradients of Spatial and Face-Part Selectivity.下枕叶回沿空间和面部部分选择性的共同梯度组织。
J Neurosci. 2021 Jun 23;41(25):5511-5521. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2415-20.2021. Epub 2021 May 20.
8
Gauging facial feature viewing preference as a stable individual trait in autism spectrum disorder.评估自闭症谱系障碍个体对面部特征的观看偏好。
Autism Res. 2021 Aug;14(8):1670-1683. doi: 10.1002/aur.2540. Epub 2021 May 19.
9
OSIEshort: A small stimulus set can reliably estimate individual differences in semantic salience.OSIEshort:一个小的刺激集可以可靠地估计语义显著性的个体差异。
J Vis. 2020 Sep 2;20(9):13. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.9.13.
10
Individual differences in visual salience vary along semantic dimensions.个体间在视觉显著性上的差异会沿着语义维度发生变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 11;116(24):11687-11692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820553116. Epub 2019 May 28.