Faculty of Medicine of Bahia, Federal University of Bahia, UFBA, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswald Cruz Foundation, Ministry of Health, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Mar 12;18(3):e0011996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011996. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Understanding the barriers to and facilitators of participation in research could enhance recruitment rates for biomedical research on Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) and help to avoid the problems associated with poor recruitment.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted a systematic review to identify factors related to willingness to participate in biomedical research on Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs). Our search included the following databases: Medline/PubMed, Embase (Embase.com), Global Index Medicus (WHO), Web of Science (Core collection), and gray literature. We included studies that analyzed or reported factors associated with willingness to participate in NTD research, using either quantitative methods (such as clinical trials, cohorts, and cross-sectional studies) or qualitative methods (such as focus group discussions, semi-structured interviews, and in-depth interviews). There were no language restrictions, but we excluded review articles, notes, case reports, letters to the editor, editor's notes, extended abstracts, proceedings, patents, editorials, and other editorial materials. Screening of citations, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment was conducted by independent reviewers, according to the study protocol registered on PROSPERO. For analyses, we assessed the frequency of barriers, enablers, and the frequency of recruitment interventions mentioned in the included studies. The protocol for this systematic review was registered under registration number CRD42020212536. (S1 Appendix) We identified 2070 citations, 1470 from the databases, and 600 from other sources. From those, eleven studies were selected for data extraction and analysis. The studies were conducted in Africa, Asia, and North America. Personal health benefits, monetary benefits, and community engagement and sensitization strategies were identified as the main reasons for participating in biomedical research on Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs). However, distrust in researchers, lack of knowledge about research methods among potential participants, and previous negative experiences were identified as the main barriers to participating in biomedical research on NTDs.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This systematic review provides recommendations for improving adherence to biomedical research on Neglected Tropical Diseases, which can be applied in practice.
了解参与研究的障碍和促进因素可以提高对被忽视的热带病(NTD)的生物医学研究的招募率,并有助于避免因招募不力而产生的问题。
方法/主要发现:我们进行了系统评价,以确定与参与被忽视的热带病(NTD)的生物医学研究的意愿相关的因素。我们的搜索包括以下数据库:Medline/PubMed、Embase(Embase.com)、全球医学索引(WHO)、Web of Science(核心合集)和灰色文献。我们纳入了使用定量方法(如临床试验、队列和横断面研究)或定性方法(如焦点小组讨论、半结构化访谈和深入访谈)分析或报告与参与 NTD 研究意愿相关的因素的研究。没有语言限制,但我们排除了综述文章、注释、病例报告、给编辑的信、编辑注释、扩展摘要、会议记录、专利、社论和其他编辑材料。根据在 PROSPERO 上注册的研究方案,独立审查员进行了引文筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。在分析中,我们评估了纳入研究中提到的障碍、促进因素和招募干预措施的频率。本系统评价的方案已在注册号 CRD42020212536 下注册。(S1 附录)我们共确定了 2070 条引文,其中数据库中有 1470 条,其他来源有 600 条。其中,有 11 项研究被选作数据提取和分析。这些研究在非洲、亚洲和北美进行。个人健康益处、金钱利益以及社区参与和宣传策略被确定为参与被忽视的热带病(NTD)的生物医学研究的主要原因。然而,研究人员缺乏信任、潜在参与者对研究方法缺乏了解以及以前的负面经验被确定为参与被忽视的热带病(NTD)的生物医学研究的主要障碍。
结论/意义:本系统评价为提高对被忽视的热带病的生物医学研究的依从性提供了建议,这些建议可在实践中应用。