Suppr超能文献

经无损视网膜激光疗法(NRT)的非中心性糖尿病黄斑水肿亚阈值激光治疗。

Subthreshold laser treatment for non-center involved diabetic macular edema via non-damaging retinal laser therapy (NRT).

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Üniversiteler Mahallesi Bilkent Cad. No: 1 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.

Veni Vidi Eye Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 12;44(1):129. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03065-1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of subthreshold laser treatment via non-damaging retinal laser therapy (NRT) in patients with non-center involved diabetic macular edema (non-CI DME).

METHODS

In this prospective controlled study, NRT with 577 nm wavelength was performed to the edematous inner subfields as needed at 3 monthly intervals, while the control group received no treatment. If CI-DME developed in either group, intravitreal anti-VEGF was performed and the eye was excluded from subsequent analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 75 eyes (36 study eyes, 39 controls) were evaluated. The change in superior, nasal and temporal inner subfield thicknesses over time and between groups was found significant (P = 0.004, P < 0.001, P = 0.04 respectively). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change was not significant over time and between groups (P = 0.69). Rates of CI-DME development requiring intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment were not different during the first and second years (P = 0.171, 0.908). No laser scar was detected in any eye in fundus autofluorescence imaging.

CONCLUSION

NRT performed as needed at 3 monthly intervals is effective after 21 months of follow up in the treatment of non-CI DME and it was safe. With this method, it may be foreseen that BCVA will be better preserved in the long term by avoiding the possible side effects of conventional laser.

摘要

目的

评估通过非损伤性视网膜激光治疗(NRT)进行亚阈值激光治疗(subthreshold laser treatment)对非中心累及性糖尿病性黄斑水肿(non-CI DME)患者的疗效。

方法

在这项前瞻性对照研究中,根据需要,每 3 个月用 577nm 波长的 NRT 对水肿的内亚场进行治疗,而对照组则不进行治疗。如果两组中任何一组出现 CI-DME,均进行玻璃体内抗 VEGF 治疗,并将该眼排除在后续分析之外。

结果

共评估了 75 只眼(36 只研究眼,39 只对照眼)。发现随着时间的推移和组间比较,上方、鼻侧和颞侧内亚场厚度的变化具有统计学意义(P=0.004,P<0.001,P=0.04)。最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的变化在时间和组间均无统计学意义(P=0.69)。在第一年和第二年,需要玻璃体内抗 VEGF 治疗的 CI-DME 发展率无差异(P=0.171,0.908)。在眼底自发荧光成像中,任何一只眼均未发现激光瘢痕。

结论

在 21 个月的随访中,每 3 个月按需进行 NRT 治疗对非 CI-DME 是有效的,且安全。通过这种方法,通过避免常规激光可能产生的副作用,可能预见长期内 BCVA 将得到更好的保留。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验