Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024 Jun;27(2):407-423. doi: 10.1007/s10567-024-00471-w. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
Self-compassion is assumed to have a protective role in the etiology of emotional problems in adolescents. This assumption is primarily based on correlational data revealing negative correlations between the total score on the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) and symptom measures of anxiety and depression. Recently, however, the SCS has been criticized because this scale not only consists of items measuring compassionate self-responding (i.e., self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness), but also includes 'reversed' items measuring uncompassionate self-responding (i.e., self-criticism, isolation, and overidentification), which would undermine the validity of the scale as an index of a protective construct. The present article used two methods to demonstrate that compassionate (positive) and uncompassionate (negative) self-responding have differential effects on emotional problems in youths. In the first part, a meta-analysis based on 16 relevant studies demonstrated a modest protective effect of positive self-compassion on anxiety/depression and a large (and significantly stronger) vulnerability effect of negative self-compassion on such emotional symptoms. In the second part, network analyses were conducted on three previously collected data sets and these analyses again showed that negative self-compassion is more closely connected to young people's symptoms of anxiety and depression than positive self-compassion. It is argued that the observed differential effects should not be discarded as a subversive fallacy, but rather offer an opportunity for studying the role of self-compassion in adolescents' emotional psychopathology in a more sophisticated way, taking into account both protection and vulnerability.
自我同情被认为在青少年情绪问题的病因学中具有保护作用。这种假设主要基于相关数据,这些数据显示自我同情量表(SCS)的总分与焦虑和抑郁的症状测量之间存在负相关。然而,最近 SCS 受到了批评,因为该量表不仅包含测量有同情心的自我反应(即自我友善、共同人性和正念)的项目,还包含测量不友善的自我反应(即自我批判、孤立和过度认同)的“反向”项目,这会破坏该量表作为保护结构指标的有效性。本文使用两种方法证明了有同情心(积极)和不友善(消极)的自我反应对年轻人的情绪问题有不同的影响。在第一部分,基于 16 项相关研究的荟萃分析表明,积极的自我同情对焦虑/抑郁有适度的保护作用,而消极的自我同情对这些情绪症状有较大(且显著更强)的脆弱性作用。在第二部分,对三个先前收集的数据进行了网络分析,这些分析再次表明,消极的自我同情与年轻人的焦虑和抑郁症状比积极的自我同情更为密切相关。有人认为,不应该将观察到的差异效应视为颠覆性谬论而予以摒弃,而是应该提供一个机会,以更复杂的方式研究自我同情在青少年情绪心理病理中的作用,同时考虑到保护和脆弱性。