Suppr超能文献

自我同情的利弊:自我同情量表的表面效度检验及其与非临床青少年应对方式和情绪症状关系的调查

Good and Bad Sides of Self-Compassion: A Face Validity Check of the Self-Compassion Scale and an Investigation of its Relations to Coping and Emotional Symptoms in Non-Clinical Adolescents.

作者信息

Muris Peter, van den Broek Myrr, Otgaar Henry, Oudenhoven Iris, Lennartz Janine

机构信息

1Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

2Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.

出版信息

J Child Fam Stud. 2018;27(8):2411-2421. doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1099-z. Epub 2018 May 4.

Abstract

To demonstrate that the positive and negative subscales of Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) are very different in nature, we conducted a series of face validity checks on the items of this questionnaire among psychologists and psychology students (Study 1). Furthermore, a survey was administered to a convenience sample of non-clinical adolescents to examine the relations between various SCS subscales and symptoms of anxiety and depression as well as coping styles (Study 2). The results of the face validity checks revealed that the positive subscales seem to be well in line with the protective nature of self-compassion as they were mainly associated with cognitive coping and healthy functioning, whereas the negative subscales were chiefly associated with psychopathological symptoms and mental illness. The survey data demonstrated that the positive SCS subscales were positively correlated with adaptive coping ('s between .22 and .50) and negatively correlated with symptoms of anxiety and depression ('s between -.19 and -.53), while the negative subscales were positively correlated with symptoms ('s between .49 and .61) and maladaptive coping strategies such as passive reacting ('s between .53 and .56). Additional analyses indicated the negative subscales of the SCS accounted for a significant proportion of the variance in symptoms, whereas the unique contribution of the positive SCS subscales was fairly marginal. We caution to employ the total SCS score that includes the reversed negative subscales as such a procedure clearly inflates the relation between self-compassion and psychopathology.

摘要

为了证明自我同情量表(SCS)的积极和消极分量表在本质上有很大不同,我们对该问卷的项目在心理学家和心理学专业学生中进行了一系列表面效度检查(研究1)。此外,我们对非临床青少年的一个便利样本进行了一项调查,以检验SCS各分量表与焦虑和抑郁症状以及应对方式之间的关系(研究2)。表面效度检查的结果显示,积极分量表似乎与自我同情的保护性本质非常吻合,因为它们主要与认知应对和健康功能相关,而消极分量表主要与心理病理症状和精神疾病相关。调查数据表明,SCS积极分量表与适应性应对呈正相关(相关系数在0.22至0.50之间),与焦虑和抑郁症状呈负相关(相关系数在-0.19至-0.53之间),而消极分量表与症状呈正相关(相关系数在0.49至0.61之间),与被动反应等适应不良的应对策略呈正相关(相关系数在0.53至0.56之间)。进一步分析表明,SCS的消极分量表在症状变异中占很大比例,而SCS积极分量表的独特贡献相当有限。我们提醒不要使用包含反向计分的消极分量表的SCS总分,因为这样做明显夸大了自我同情与精神病理学之间的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b245/6061019/947e7eb0e190/10826_2018_1099_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验