Volloch Vladimir, Rits-Volloch Sophia
Department of Developmental Biology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Division of Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Mar 4;25(5):2981. doi: 10.3390/ijms25052981.
For at least two reasons, the current transgenic animal models of Alzheimer's disease (AD) appear to be patently inadequate. They may be useful in many respects, the AD models; however, they are not. First, they are incapable of developing the full spectrum of the AD pathology. Second, they respond spectacularly well to drugs that are completely ineffective in the treatment of symptomatic AD. These observations indicate that both the transgenic animal models and the drugs faithfully reflect the theory that guided the design and development of both, the amyloid cascade hypothesis (ACH), and that both are inadequate because their underlying theory is. This conclusion necessitated the formulation of a new, all-encompassing theory of conventional AD-the ACH2.0. The two principal attributes of the ACH2.0 are the following. One, in conventional AD, the agent that causes the disease and drives its pathology is the intraneuronal amyloid-β (Aβ) produced in two distinctly different pathways. Two, following the commencement of AD, the bulk of Aβ is generated independently of Aβ protein precursor (AβPP) and is retained inside the neuron as Aβ. Within the framework of the ACH2.0, AβPP-derived Aβ accumulates physiologically in a lifelong process. It cannot reach levels required to support the progression of AD; it does, however, cause the disease. Indeed, conventional AD occurs if and when the levels of AβPP-derived Aβ cross the critical threshold, elicit the neuronal integrated stress response (ISR), and trigger the activation of the AβPP-independent Aβ generation pathway; the disease commences only when this pathway is operational. The Aβ produced in this pathway reaches levels sufficient to drive the AD pathology; it also propagates its own production and thus sustains the activity of the pathway and perpetuates its operation. The present study analyzes the reason underlying the evident inadequacy of the current transgenic animal models of AD. It concludes that they model, in fact, not Alzheimer's disease but rather the effects of the neuronal ISR sustained by AβPP-derived Aβ, that this is due to the lack of the operational AβPP-independent Aβ production pathway, and that this mechanism must be incorporated into any successful AD model faithfully emulating the disease. The study dissects the plausible molecular mechanisms of the AβPP-independent Aβ production and the pathways leading to their activation, and introduces the concept of conventional versus unconventional Alzheimer's disease. It also proposes the path forward, posits the principles of design of productive transgenic animal models of the disease, and describes the molecular details of their construction.
出于至少两个原因,目前的阿尔茨海默病(AD)转基因动物模型明显存在不足。这些AD模型在许多方面可能有用;然而,事实并非如此。其一,它们无法发展出AD病理的全谱。其二,它们对那些在治疗有症状的AD时完全无效的药物反应极佳。这些观察结果表明,转基因动物模型和药物都忠实地反映了指导两者设计和开发的理论——淀粉样蛋白级联假说(ACH),而且两者都存在不足,因为它们的基础理论就是如此。这一结论促使人们提出了一种全新的、涵盖传统AD的理论——ACH2.0。ACH2.0的两个主要特性如下。其一,在传统AD中,导致疾病并驱动其病理过程的因素是通过两种截然不同的途径产生的神经元内淀粉样β蛋白(Aβ)。其二,在AD开始后,大部分Aβ是独立于Aβ蛋白前体(AβPP)产生的,并以Aβ的形式保留在神经元内。在ACH2.0的框架内,源自AβPP的Aβ在一个终身过程中生理性地积累。它无法达到支持AD进展所需的水平;然而,它确实会引发疾病。实际上,当源自AβPP的Aβ水平超过临界阈值、引发神经元整合应激反应(ISR)并触发不依赖AβPP的Aβ生成途径的激活时,传统AD就会发生;只有当这条途径开始运作时,疾病才会开始。在这条途径中产生的Aβ达到足以驱动AD病理过程的水平;它还会促进自身的产生,从而维持该途径的活性并使其持续运作。本研究分析了当前AD转基因动物模型明显不足的根本原因。研究得出结论,实际上它们模拟的不是阿尔茨海默病,而是由源自AβPP的Aβ维持的神经元ISR的影响,这是由于缺乏可运作的不依赖AβPP的Aβ产生途径,并且任何成功模拟该疾病的AD模型都必须纳入这一机制。该研究剖析了不依赖AβPP的Aβ产生及其激活途径的合理分子机制,并引入了传统与非传统阿尔茨海默病的概念。它还提出了前进的方向,阐述了该疾病有效转基因动物模型的设计原则,并描述了其构建的分子细节。