Volloch Vladimir, Rits-Volloch Sophia
Department of Developmental Biology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Division of Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Genes (Basel). 2025 Jan 2;16(1):46. doi: 10.3390/genes16010046.
A notion of the continuous production of amyloid-β (Aβ) via the proteolysis of Aβ-protein-precursor (AβPP) in Alzheimer's disease (AD)-affected neurons constitutes both a cornerstone and an article of faith in the Alzheimer's research field. The present Perspective challenges this assumption. It analyses the relevant empirical data and reaches an unexpected conclusion, namely that in AD-afflicted neurons, the production of AβPP-derived Aβ is either discontinued or severely suppressed, a concept that, if proven, would fundamentally change our understanding of the disease. This suppression, effectively self-suppression, occurs in the context of the global inhibition of the cellular cap-dependent protein synthesis as a consequence of the neuronal integrated stress response (ISR) elicited by AβPP-derived intraneuronal Aβ (Aβ; hence self-suppression) upon reaching certain levels. Concurrently with the suppression of the AβPP proteolytic pathway, the neuronal ISR activates in human neurons, but not in mouse neurons, the powerful AD-driving pathway generating the C99 fragment of AβPP independently of AβPP. The present study describes molecular mechanisms potentially involved in these phenomena, propounds novel approaches to generate transgenic animal models of AD, advocates for the utilization of human neuronal cells-based models of the disease, makes verifiable predictions, suggests experiments designed to validate the proposed concept, and considers its potential research and therapeutic implications. Remarkably, it opens up the possibility that the conventional production of AβPP, BACE enzymes, and γ-secretase components is also suppressed under the neuronal ISR conditions in AD-affected neurons, resulting in the dyshomeostasis of AβPP. It follows that whereas conventional AD is triggered by AβPP-derived Aβ accumulated to the ISR-eliciting levels, the disease, in its both conventional and unconventional (triggered by the neuronal ISR-eliciting stressors distinct from Aβ) forms, is driven not (or not only) by Aβ produced in the AβPP-independent pathway, as we proposed previously, but mainly, possibly exclusively, by the C99 fragment generated independently of AβPP and not cleaved at the γ-site due to the neuronal ISR-caused deficiency of γ-secretase (apparently, the AD-driving "substance X" predicted in our previous study), a paradigm consistent with a dictum by George Perry that Aβ is "central but not causative" in AD. The proposed therapeutic strategies would not only deplete the driver of the disease and abrogate the AβPP-independent production of C99 but also reverse the neuronal ISR and ameliorate the AβPP dyshomeostasis, a potentially significant contributor to AD pathology.
在阿尔茨海默病(AD)受累神经元中,通过β淀粉样蛋白前体(AβPP)的蛋白水解持续产生β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)这一概念,既是阿尔茨海默病研究领域的基石,也是该领域的一种信念。本文的观点对这一假设提出了挑战。它分析了相关的实证数据,并得出了一个意想不到的结论,即在AD受累神经元中,AβPP衍生的Aβ的产生要么停止,要么受到严重抑制。如果这一概念得到证实,将从根本上改变我们对该疾病的理解。这种抑制,实际上是自我抑制,发生在细胞帽依赖性蛋白质合成受到全局抑制的背景下,这是由AβPP衍生的神经元内Aβ(Aβ;因此是自我抑制)达到一定水平引发的神经元综合应激反应(ISR)导致的。在抑制AβPP蛋白水解途径的同时,神经元ISR在人类神经元中激活,但在小鼠神经元中不激活,激活了强大的AD驱动途径,独立于AβPP产生AβPP的C99片段。本研究描述了可能参与这些现象的分子机制,提出了生成AD转基因动物模型的新方法,主张利用基于人类神经元细胞的疾病模型,做出了可验证的预测,提出了旨在验证所提出概念的实验,并考虑了其潜在的研究和治疗意义。值得注意的是,它开辟了一种可能性,即在AD受累神经元的神经元ISR条件下,AβPP、BACE酶和γ-分泌酶成分的常规产生也受到抑制,导致AβPP的动态平衡失调。由此可见,虽然传统的AD是由积累到引发ISR水平的AβPP衍生的Aβ触发的,但该疾病,无论是其传统形式还是非传统形式(由不同于Aβ的引发神经元ISR的应激源触发),并非如我们之前所提出的那样,由AβPP非依赖性途径产生的Aβ驱动(或不仅由其驱动),而是主要(可能仅)由独立于AβPP产生且由于神经元ISR导致的γ-分泌酶缺乏而未在γ位点切割的C99片段驱动(显然,这是我们之前研究中预测的AD驱动“物质X”),这一范式与乔治·佩里的一句格言一致,即Aβ在AD中“处于核心地位但并非病因”。所提出的治疗策略不仅会耗尽疾病的驱动因素并消除AβPP非依赖性产生的C99,还会逆转神经元ISR并改善AβPP动态平衡失调,这可能是AD病理学的一个重要促成因素。